Abstract
‘Ration’ is a six-letter four-letter word. Those who use the term typically do so to condemn, to shock, or to scandalize. Liberals and conservatives alike condemn President Clinton’s Health Care Reform1 simply by asserting that it “rations” heath care.2 Nothing more need be said—either in the US or in Europe —although American insularity tends to prevent Americans from noticing that Western Europeans, too, are repelled by the idea of rationing. Yet, even as popular culture on both sides of the Atlantic adamantly rejects any form of “rationing,” experts are arguing that health care systems must officially recognize and formally embrace rationing if they are to be efficient and fair. This chapter introduces readers to the rationing debates taking place on both sides of the Atlantic. It attempts to sort out various conceptions and models of rationing, and to differentiate among rhetorical posturing, substantive argument, and principled differences in the rationing debate.
Keywords
- Gross Domestic Product
- Health Care Reform
- Health Care Delivery System
- Brookings Institution
- Negotiation Model
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Health Security Act,103 Congress, 1st Session, US Government Printing Offfice, Washington, DC, 1993.
Dworkin, R. (1994) “Will Clinton’s plan be fair.” New York Review of Books, January 13, pp. 20–25.
Aaron, H. (1992) The Oregon Experiment, in Rationing America’s Medical Care: The Oregon Plan and Beyond, Strosberg, M., Wiener, J., and Baker, R., eds., The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, p. 107.
Halper, T. (1989) The Misfortunes of Others, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 149.
Friedman, E. (1991) The uninsured: dilemma to crisis. JAMA 265, 2491–2495.
Wiener, J. M. (1992) Rationing in America: overt and covert, in Rationing America’s Medical Care: The Oregon Plan and Beyond, Strosberg, M., Wiener, J., and Baker, R., eds., The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, p. 12.
Wiener, p. 12.
Wiener, pp. 12,13.
Wiener does, however, cite as the basis of his view. Merrill, J. and Cohen, A. B. (1987) The Emperor’s new clothes: unraveling the myths about rationing, Inquiry 24, pp. 105–109.
Williams, B. (1962) The ideal of equality, in Politics, Philosophy and Society II, Laslett and Runciman, eds., Blackwell, Oxford, reprinted in Williams, B. (1973) Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers, 1956–1962, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 240, 241.
Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia, Basic Books, New York, pp. 233–235.
Klein, R. (1983) The Politics of the National Health Service, Lognman, London, p. 153.
Government Committee on Choices in Health Care (1992) Choices in Health Care, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.
Hastings Center (1988) Guidelines on the Termination of Life-Sustaining Treatment and the Care of the Dying, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, p. 32.
Choices,p. 51
Kaplan, R. (1992) A quality of life approach to health resource allocation, in Rationing America’s Medical Care: The Oregon Plan and Beyond, Strosberg, M., Weiner, J., and Baker, R., eds., The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, pp. 60–78.
Lewin, T. (1994) “Prize in an unusual lottery: an experimental drug,” The New York Times, January 7, p. 1.
Starzl, T., Hakala, T., and Tzakis, A. (1987) A multifactorial system for equitable selection of cadaver kidney recipients. JAMA, 257, 3073–3075.
US General Accounting Office (1990) Health Insurance Cost Increases Lead to Coverage Limitations and Cost Shifting,Washington DC.
Eckstein, H. (1958) The English Health Service: Its Origins, Structure, and Achievements, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p. 172; see also Klein, R. (1983) The Politics of the National Health Service, Longman Group Ltd., London, pp. 62–66.
Eckholm, E. (1993) Study links paperwork to 25% of hospital costs, The New York Times, August 5, p. 1.
Eckholm, E. (1993) Some fear rationing of health care. The New York Times, November 14, 4A, p. 17.
Yates, J. (1987) Why Are We Waiting? An Analysis of Hospital Waiting Lists, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Aaron, H. and Schwartz, W. (1984) The Painful Prescription: Rationing Hospital Care, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC, p. 58.
Government Committee on Choices in Health Care (1992) Choices inHealth Care, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands, p. 20.
Baker, R. (1993) A study of physician gatekeeping in the British National Health Service. Professional Ethics, 2, pp. 3–34.
Sarin, A. (1994) Caring Denmark writes off the old. Le Monde, February 8 (International Edition).
Dworkin, R. (1994) Will Clinton’s plan be fair. New York Review of Books, January 13, p 21.
Kolnia, G. (1993) Mammogram guideline dropped. The New York Times, December 5, Section 1, p. 30.
Mooreim, E. H. (1993) Balancing Act, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Dworkin, R. (1993) Life’s Dominion, Knopf, New York.
Lubitz, J. and Riley, G. (1993) Trends in Medicare payments in the last years of life. N. Engl. J. Med. 328, 1092–1096.
Emanuel, E. and Emanuel, L. (1994) The economics of dying. N. Engl. J. Med. 330, 540–544.
Daniels, N. (1988) Am I My Parents’ Keeper,Oxford University Press, New York. Both Callahan and Daniels presume some version of what Daniels characterizes as the “prudential life span account,” in which an individual’s life is viewed through various phases of the aging process: childhood, youth, adulthood, age. In this chapter, I arbitrarily characterize each of the four ages of humankind as quadrants; I also presume that the medically assisted life-span is about 100 years—hence, there are four quadrants, the last of which is from 75 to 100.
Brock, D. (1989) Justice, health care and the elderly, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18, 297–312.
Brock, D. (1993) Life and Death, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Callahan, D. (1987) Setting Limits, Simon and Schuster, New York.
For a good overview of British discussion of QALYs see Bioethics 6 July 1993.
Menzel, P. (1990) Strong Medicine, Oxford University Press, New York. See also the review of Strong Medicine by Julian Savulescu, and the response by Menzel in the British journal, Bioethics 65, 1992.
See Baker, R. and Strosberg, M. (1992) Triage and equality: a historical reassessment of utilitarian analyses of triage, Kennedy Institute of Ethics J. 2 103–124.
Hadorn, D. (1991) The Oregon price setting exercise. Hastings Center Report 21, 11–16.
Baker, R. (1993) Visibility and the just allocation of health care. Health Care Analysis 1, 139–150.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baker, R. (1995). Rationing, Rhetoric, and Rationality. In: Humber, J.M., Almeder, R.F. (eds) Allocating Health Care Resources. Biomedical Ethics Reviews. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-447-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-447-4_3
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4479-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-447-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive