Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biological Mothers and the Disposition of Fetuses After Abortion

  • Chapter
Bioethics and the Fetus

Part of the book series: Biomedical Ethics Reviews ((BER))

  • 72 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter begins from abortion but is not about abortion. It examines some aspects of the role of the biological mother with respect to the disposition of fetuses after abortions. Should the biological mother be entitled to determine the disposition of the fetus where that disposition is not in the interests of the fetus itself? In particular, should the mother be entitled to be assured of the fetus’ death, either during or after the abortion? Is it wrong to preserve, against the woman’s wishes, fetuses that do or can survive abortion?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Moreover, there is a growing body of bioethical literature that uses the term “fetus” to refer to the entity that survives abortion.

    Google Scholar 

  2. n the significance of sentience, see M. A. Warren (1989) The moral significance of birth. Hypatia 4(3), 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Overall (1987) Chapter4, inEthics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. Allen and Unwin, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Overall (1987) Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. Allen and Unwin, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. M. Herbenick (1975) Remarks on abortion, abandonment, and adoption opportunities. Philosophy and Public Affairs 5(1), 98–104. This analogy may not be completely appropriate in cases of abortion for fetal abnormality. In such cases, the fetus is very much wanted, yet the fetus itself may be better off dead, not preserved. On the ambiguities of seeking abortion for the benefit of the fetus, see P. F. Camenisch (1983) Abortion: For the fetus’s own sake? in Medical Ethics and Human Life ( J. E. Thomas, ed.) Samuel Stevens, Toronto, pp. 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. B. Mahowald, R. A. Ratcheson, and J. Silver. (1987) The ethical options in transplanting fetal tissue. Hastings Center Report 17 (1), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Bok (1984) The unwanted child: Caring for the fetus born alive after an abortion, in Cases in Bioethics, revised ed. ( C. Levine and R. M. Veatch, eds.), Hastings Center, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. S. Levin (1985) Thomson and the current state of the abortion controversy. Journal of Applied Ethics 2 (1), 125;

    Google Scholar 

  9. cf. S. L. Ross (1982) Abortion and the death of the fetus. Philosophy and Public Affairs 11 (3), 236;

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. M. Herbenick (1975) Remarks on abortion, abandonment, and adoption opportunities. Philosophy and Public Affairs 5 (1), 101.

    Google Scholar 

  11. I owe this argument to Lois Pineau.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. I. Wikler (1979) Ought we to try to save aborted fetuses? Ethics 90, 58–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. S. L. Ross (1982) Abortion and the death of the fetus. Philosophy and Public Affairs 11(3), 238, his emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. C. Nathan (1984) The unwanted child: Caring for the fetus born alive after an abortion, in Cases in Bioethics, revised ed. ( C. Levine and R. M. Veatch, eds.), Hastings Center, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tor further discussion of the interest in avoiding genetic offspring, see J. A. Robertson (1989) Resolving disputes over frozen embryos. Hastings Center Report 19(6) 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. L. Ross (1982) Abortion and the death of the fetus. Philosophy and Public Affairs 11(3), 241, his emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Ross (1982) Abortion and the death of the fetus. Philosophy and Public Affairs 11 (3), 239.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. G. Raymond (1990) Reproductive gifts and gift giving: The altruistic woman. Hastings Center Report 20 (6), 7–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. A version of this argument was presented to me by Salida Rodgers.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H.Arkes (1986)First Things: An Inquiry into the First Principles of Morals and Justice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, p. 377.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Arkes (1986) First Things: An Inquiry into the First Principles of Morals and Justice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, p. 378.

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Leber (1989) We must rescue them. Hastings Center Report 19 (6), 26–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. K. Nolan (1988) Genug ist genug: A fetus is not a kidney. Hastings Center Report 18 (6), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Arkes (1986) First Things: An Inquiry into the First Principles of Morals and Justice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, p. 371.

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. B. Andrews (1986) My body, my property. Hastings Center Report 16 (5), 28–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. L. B. Andrews (1986) My body, my property. Hastings Center Report 16 (5), 28–38;

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. G. J. Annas (1988) Whose waste is it anyway? The case of John Moore. Hastings Center Report 18 (5), 37–39;

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. G. J. Annas (1990) Outrageous fortune: Selling other people’s cells. Hastings Center Report 20 (6), 36–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. G. J. Annas (1990) Outrageous fortune: Selling other people’s cells. Hastings Center Report 20(6), 37, his emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Sherwin (1988) Review of Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. Atlantis 13 (2), 125.

    Google Scholar 

  31. There are further feminist reasons for avoiding the ownership paradigm for the fetus, since there is a developing history of seeing the fetus as the property of the male progenitor, the man’s “baby.”

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. A. Coffey (1989) Review of Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. Resources For Feminist Research/Documentation sur la recherche feministe 18 (1), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Sherwin (1988) Review of Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. Atlantis 13 (2), 125.

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. Sherwin (1988) Review of Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. Atlantis 13 (2), 123–125.

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. A. Warren (1989) The moral significance of birth. Hypatia 4 (3), 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. M. A. Warren (1989) The moral significance of birth. Hypatia 4 (3), 62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J. G. Raymond (1990) Of ice and men: The big chill over women’ s reproductive rights. Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering: Journal of International Feminist Analysis 3 (1), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Sherwin (1988) Review of Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. Atlantis 13 (2), 125.

    Google Scholar 

  39. A. Donchin (1989) The growing feminist debate over the new reproductive technologies. Hypatia 4 (3), 144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. L. Walters (1984) The unwanted child: Caring for the fetus born alive after an abortion, in Cases in Bioethics, revised ed. ( C. Levine and R. M. Veatch, eds.), Hastings Center, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  41. J. Gallagher (1989) Fetus as patient, in Reproductive Laws for the 1990s ( S. Cohen and N. Taub, eds.), Humana Press, Clifton, NJ, pp. 185–235;

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. National Association of Women and the Law (1989) A response to Crimes Against the Foetus, The Law Reform Commission of Canada’s working paper #58. Ottawa, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  43. M. Thompson (1988) Whose womb is it anyway? Healthsharing (Spring), 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  44. D. S. Levin (1985) Thomson and the current state of the abortion controversy. Journal of Applied Ethics 2 (1), 124.

    Google Scholar 

  45. D. S. Levin (1985) Thomson and the current state of the abortion controversy. Journal of Applied Ethics 2(1), 125; cf. E. F. Paul and J. Paul. (1979) Self-ownership, abortion and infanticide. Journal of Medical Ethics 5, 135.

    Google Scholar 

  46. S. Sherwin (1988) Review of Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. Atlantis 13 (2), 125.

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. A. Robertson (1988) Rights, symbolism, and public policy in fetal tissue transplants. Hastings Center Report 18(6), 9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Christine Overall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    James M. Humber  & Robert F. Almeder  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Overall, C. (1991). Biological Mothers and the Disposition of Fetuses After Abortion. In: Humber, J.M., Almeder, R.F. (eds) Bioethics and the Fetus. Biomedical Ethics Reviews. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-445-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-445-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4609-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-445-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation