Skip to main content

The Nurse’s Role

Responsibilities and Rights

  • Chapter
Biomedical Ethics Reviews · 1987

Part of the book series: Biomedical Ethics Reviews ((BER))

  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

There is general agreement among nursing theorists that the root concepts of nursing are: nursing, health, person, and environment or society.1 These concepts, together, comprise the metaparadigm of nursing and identify its distinctive scientific focus. In contrast, the metaparadigm concepts of medicine are: physician, pathophysiology, person, and society or environment. Every theory or model of nursing or of medicine will incorporate and define the profession’s metaparadigm concepts and their linkages. Thus, although theories of medicine will differ among themselves, and theories of nursing will likewise differ, they will remain theories of medicine or nursing, by virtue of their incorporation of all of the particular root concepts of the profession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes And References

  1. Jacqueline Fawcett (1984) Analysis and Evaluation of Conceptual Models of Nursing E A. Davis, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Nurses’ Association (1980) Nursing: A Social Policy Statement American Nurses’ Association, Kansas City, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lystra Gretter (1893) The Florence Nightingale Pledge Lystra Gretter.

    Google Scholar 

  4. lntemational Council of Nurses (1973) Code For Nurses Geneva, ICN.

    Google Scholar 

  5. American Nurses’ Association (1985) Code for Nurses with Interpretive Statements, Kansas City, MO, ANA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. lbid.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Winslow, G. (1984) From Loyalty to Advocacy: A New Metaphor for Nursing, Hastings Center Report 14 (3), pp. 32–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. lbid., p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  9. bid., p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Code p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fry, S. T. (1984) Ethics in Community Health Nursing Practice, in Community Health Nursing ( L. Lancaster and M. Stanhope, eds.) St. Louis, MO, Mosby, pp. 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fowler, M. D. M. (1984) Ethics in Nursing, 1893–1984: The Ideal of Service, The Reality of History Los Angeles, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kohnke, M. E. (1980) The Nurse as Advocate. American Journal of Nursing, 80: 2038–2040.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Uustal, D. (1987) Values: Cornerstone of Nurses’ Moral Art, in Ethics at the Bedside (M. Fowler and J. Levine—Ariff, eds.) Philadelphia, Lippincott, pp. 136170

    Google Scholar 

  15. Janis, I. (1983) Short-Term Counseling. New Haven, Yale University Press, p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Spicker, S. and Gadow, S. (1980) Nursing Images and Ideals: Opening Dialogue with the Humanities New York, Springer, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fry, S. T. (1987) Autonomy, Advocacy, and Accountability: Ethics at the Bedside, Ethics at the Bedside (M. Fowler and J. Levine—Ariff, eds.) Philadelphia, Lippincott, pp. 39–50. I am indebted to Dr. Fry for her typology of models of advocacy.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy, C. P. (1983) Models of the Nurse-Patient Relationship, in Ethical Problems in the NursePatientRelationship ( C. P. Murphy and H. Hunter, eds.) Boston, Allyn and Bacon, pp. 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Freeman, R. (1971) Practice as Protest. American Journal of Nursing 71: 5, 918–921.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid., p. 920.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Code, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Committee on Ethics, American Nurses’ Association (December 1986) Ethics of Safeguarding Client Health and Safety,Kansas City, MO, ANA. 24 Code, p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  24. American Nurses’ Association (1986) Guidelines for Nurses’ Participation and Leadership in Institutional Ethical Review Processes, Kansas City, MO, ANA.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  26. ANA, Social Policy Statement, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fowler, M.D.M. (1988). The Nurse’s Role. In: Humber, J.M., Almeder, R.F. (eds) Biomedical Ethics Reviews · 1987. Biomedical Ethics Reviews. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-442-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-442-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4636-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-442-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics