Skip to main content

Medical Decisionmaking Under Uncertainty

  • Chapter
Biomedical Ethics Reviews · 1985

Part of the book series: Biomedical Ethics Reviews ((BER))

  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

Should aggressive treatment of premature or low-birth-weight infants be undertaken when prognosis is uncertain? Doctors know how to treat many premature or low-birth-weight infants so that they grow up to lead normal lives. But there are some premature or low-birth-weight infants that doctors do not know how to treat. Given the current state of medical knowledge, these infants cannot be saved, and their premature death is inevitable. The question posed does not ask about either of these two classes of infants. In their case, prognosis is not uncertain. Within the uncertainty that the ineluctably attends all empirical knowl-edge, we know what will happen to them, both if they are, or are not, treated. Nor do they present any peculiar conceptual problem. For ex-ample, the only difference between infants in the first class and normal infants, is that caring for the former costs more. Similarly, infants in the second class also present no peculiar problem. If an infant is dying and doctors know only how to prolong its life by a few hours or days, treatment will be either experimental or given to reduce the pain. These are exactly the alternatives we face when it is an adult who is dying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. For example, Laura Purdy and Michael Tooley (1974) is abortion murder? Abortion: Pro and Con (Robert L. Perkins, ed.), Schenkman, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  2. My position here does not contradict my earlier argument that, though infants do not desire life, they can have rights to life, if life will be valuable to them. For though I argue here that desiring life is the best criterion that life is valuable, I do not say that it is a condition of life being valuable.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boxill, B. (1985). Medical Decisionmaking Under Uncertainty. In: Humber, J.M., Almeder, R.F. (eds) Biomedical Ethics Reviews · 1985. Biomedical Ethics Reviews. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-441-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-441-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4634-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-441-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics