Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Image-Guided Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions

  • Chapter
Image-Guided Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer

  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

The decline in mortality from breast cancer seen in the United States beginning in 1989 appears to be correlated with the increased use of screening mammography programs. Data from the Swedish Two County Study show that the implementation of a screening program decreased mortality by 60% (1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HT, Yen M, Duffy SW, Smith RA. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 2001;91:1724–1731.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA. Needle localization breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 1997;204:677.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kopans DB.: The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR 1992;158:521.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kopans DB, Meyer JE. Versatile spring hook-wire breast lesion localizer. AJR 1982;138:586–587.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer JE, Kopans DB, Stomper PC, Lindfors KK. Occult breast abnormalities: percutaneous preoperative needle localization. Radiology 1984;150:335–337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liberman L, Kaplan J, Van Zee KR, Morris EA, LaTrenta LR, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD. Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization. AJR 2001;177:565–572.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stomper PC, Davis SP, Sonnenfeld MR, Meyer JE, Greenes RA, Eberlein TJ. Efficacy of specimen radiography of clinically occult noncalcified lesions. AJR 1988;151:43–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kopans DB, Meyer, JE, Lindfors KK, Bucchianeri SS. Breast sonography to guide cyst aspiration and wire localization of occult solid lesions. AJR 1984;143:489–492.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frenna TH, Meyer JE, Sonnenfeld MD. US of breast biopsy specimens. Radiology 1994;190:573.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Anonymous. The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. N 1H Consensus Development Conference. Am J Surg 1997;174:371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arisio R, Cuccorese C, Grazia Accinelli, Mano MP, Bordon R, Fessia L. Kole of fineneedle aspiration biopsy in breast lesions: analysis of a series of 4,110 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1998;18:462–467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson VP. The status of mammographically guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:155–166.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, and Bravetti P. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1989;173:57–59.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Helvic MA, Baker DE, Adler DD, Andersson I, Naylor B, Buckwalter KA. Radiographically guided fine-needle aspiration of nonpalpable breast lesions. Radiology 1990;174:657–661.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boerner S, Fornage BD, Singletary E, Sneige N. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of nonpalpable breast lesions: a review of 1885 FNA cases using the National Cancer Institute-supported recommendations on the uniform approach to breast FNA. Cancer 1999;87:19–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J, et al. Rate of unsufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. Cancer 1998;82:678–688.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990;176:741–747.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991;180:403–407.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multiinstitutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359–364.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rissanen TJ, Makarainen HP, Matilla SI, et al. Wire localized biopsy of breast lesions: a review of 425 cases found in screening or clinical mammography. Clin Radiol 1993;47:14–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Homer MJ, Smith TJ, Safaii H. Prebiopsy needle localization: methods, problems, and expected result. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:139–153.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Norton LW, Zeligman BE, and Pearlman NW. Accuracy and cost of needle localization breast biopsy. Arch Surg 1988;123:947–950.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Norton LW, Pearlman NW. Needle localization breast biopsy: accuracy versus cost. Am J Surg 1988;156:13B-15B.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harter LP, Curtis JS, Ponto G, Craig PH. Malignant seeding of the needle track during stereotaxic core needle breast biopsy. Radiology 1992;185:713–714.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Abramson AF, Deutch BM, Hann LE. Stereotactic 14-gage breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed: Radiology 1994;192;793–795.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with a directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy instrument. Radiology 1997;202:843–847.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 1999;281:1638–1641.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al . US-guided automated large-core needle biopsy. Radiology 1993;187:507–511.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chare MJ. B., Flowers CI, O’Brien CJ, Dawson A. Image-guided core biopsy in patients with breast disease. Br J Surg 1996;83:1415–1416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith DN, Rosenfield Darling ML, et al. The utility of ultrasonographically guided largecore needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:43–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF. US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1998;208:717–723.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA, et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy: an indicator of missed cancer. Cancer 2000:89:2538–2546.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. March DE, Raslavicus A, Coughlin BF, Klein SV, Makari-Judson G. Use of breast core biopsy in the United States: results of a national survey. AJR 1997;169:697–701.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved harvesting with the Mammotome. Ann Surg 1996;62:738–744.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Berg WA, Krebs TL, Campassi C, Magder LS, Sun C-CJ. Evaluation of 14- and 11-gauge directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy probes and 14-gauge guns in a breast parenchymal model. Radiology 1997;205:203–208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Meyer JE, Smith DN, DiPiro PJ, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of clustered microcalcifications with a directional, vacuum-assisted device. Radiology ;204:575–576.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP. Calcifications retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 1998;208:251–260.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR 2000;175:1341–1346.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Baum JK, Raza S, Keeler B. ABBI breast biopsy: early experience using a combined radiological-surgical approach [abstract] . AJR 1998;170:83.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Liberman L. Advanced breast biopsy instrumentation (ABBI): analysis of published experience. AJR 1999;172:1413–1416.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ferzli GS, Puza T, Van Vorst-Bilotti S, Waters R. Breast biopsies with ABBI: experience with 183 attempted biopsies. Breast J 1999;5:26–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Smathers RL. Advanced breast biopsy instrumentation device: percentages of lesion and surrounding tissue removed. AJR 2000:175:801–803.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Leibman AJ, Frager D, Cho P. Experience with breast biopsies using the advanced breast biopsy instrumentation system. AJR 1999;172:1409–1416.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Goodman KA, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Compliance with recommended follow-up after percutaneous breast core biopsy. AJR 1998;170:89–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Harvath LJ, Tocino I. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and falsenegative rate. Radiology 1999;212:189–194.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Darrell N. Smith MD, MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Anthony V. D’Amico MD, PhD  & Jay R. Harris MD  & 

  2. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Jay S. Loeffler MD

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Humana Press Inc. Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, D.N. (2003). Image-Guided Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions. In: D’Amico, A.V., Loeffler, J.S., Harris, J.R. (eds) Image-Guided Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-422-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-422-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-368-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-422-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation