Advertisement

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Biopsy

  • Clare M. Tempany
  • Steven Haker
Chapter

Abstract

The goal of a cancer detection program is to detect and diagnose cancer at an early, treatable stage. Prostate cancer is routinely diagnosed by needle biopsy after the detection of either an abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level or a palpable nodule in the gland. The current standard method to obtain the tissue diagnosis is to sample the prostate gland using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) imaging guidance. Although this method is the standard clinical approach, this chapter will describe a novel diagnostic method using magnetic resonance imaging guidance that is currently being evaluated in a prospective National Cancer Institute clinical trial.

Keywords

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Prostate Gland Peripheral Zone Endorectal Coil Deformable Registration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society website: www.cancer.org. American Cancer Society Inc., Surveillance Research 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Terris MK. Sensitivity and specificity of sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: preliminary report. Urology 1999;54:486–489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Keetch DW, McMurtry JM, Smith DS, Andriole GL, Catalona WJ. Prostate specific antigen density versus prostate specific antigen slope as predictors of prostate cancer in men with initially negative prostatic biopsies. J Urol 1996;156:428–431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Naughton CK, Smith DS, Humphrey PA, Catalona WJ, and Keetch DW. Clinical and pathologic tumor characteristics of prostate cancer as a function of the number of biopsy cores: a retrospective study. Urology 1998;52(5):808–813.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tempany CM, Rahmouni AD, Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Zerhouni EA. Invasion of the neurovascular bundle by prostate cancer: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1991;181:107–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carter HB, Brem RF, Tempany CM, et al. Nonpalpable prostate cancer: detection with MR imaging. Radiology 1991;78:523–525.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hricak H, White S, Vigneron D, et al. Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal—pelvic phased-array coils. Radiology 1994;193:703–709.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ellis JH, Tempany C, Sarin MS, Gatsonis C, Rifkin MD, McNeil BJ. MR imaging sonography of early prostatic cancer: pathologic imaging features that influence identification diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:865–872.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ikonen S, Karkkainen P, Kivisaari L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostatic cancer. J Urol 1998;159:915–919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perrotti M, Han, K-R, Epstein RE, et al. Prospective evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor foci in men with prior negative prostastic biopsy: a pilot study. J Urol 1999;162:1314–1317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silverman SG, Collick BD, Figueira MR, et al. Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an openconfiguration MR imaging system [see comments]. Radiology 1995:197:175–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D’Amico AV, Cormack RA, Tempany CM. MRI-guided diagnosis treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;344:776–777.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hata N, Jinzaki M, Kacher D, et al. MRI-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation feasibility. Radiology 2001;220:263–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kurhanewicz J, Swanson MG, Nelson SJ, Vigneron DB. Combined magnetic resonsnce imaging spectroscopic imaging approach to molecular imaging of prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaji Y, Kurhanewicz J, Hricak H, et al. Localizing prostate cancer in the presence of postbiopsy changes on MR images: role of proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1998;206:785–790.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liney GP, Knowles AJ, Manton DJ, Turnbull LW, Blackband SJ, Horsman A. Comparison of conventional single echo multi-echo sequences with a fast spin-echo sequence for quantitative T2-mapping: application to the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6: 603–607.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lowry M, Liney GP, Turnbull LW, Manton DJ, Blackband SJ, Horsman A. Quantification of citrate concentration in the prostate by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: zonal age related differences. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:352–358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liney GP, Lowry M, Turnbull LW, et al. Proton MR T2 maps correlate with the citrate concentration in the prostate. NMR Biomed 1996;9:59–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liney GP, Turnbull LW, Lowry M, Turnbull LS, Knowles AJ, Horsman A. In vivo quantitation of citrate concentration water T2 relaxation time of the pathologic prostate gland using 1H MR MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:1177–1186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maier SE, Bogner P, Bajzik G, et al. Normal brain brain tumor: multicomponent apparent diffusion coefficient line scan imaging. Radiology 2001;219:842–849.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schenck JF, Jolesz FA, Roemer PB, et al. Superconducting open-configuration MR imagingsystem for image-guided therapy. Radiology 1995;195:805–814.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jolesz FA. 1996 RSNA Eugene P. Pendergrass New Horizons Lecture. Image-guided procedures the operating room of the future. Radiology 1997;204:601–612PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D’Amico AV, Cormack R, Tempany CM, et al. Real-time magnetic resonance imageguided interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of select patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;42:507–515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tempany C, D’Amico A, Cormack R, Kumar S, Silverman S, Jolesz F. MR guided prostatebrachytherapy: a new approach to seed implantation. in NE-AUA. 1999;Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cormack R, Kooy H, Tempany C, D’Amico A. (1998) A clinical method for real-time dosimetric guidance of transperineal 125I prostate implants using interventional magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;46(1): 207–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hurwitz MD, Cormack R, Tempany CM, Kumar S, D’Amico AV. Three-dimensional realtime magnetic resonance-guided interstitial prostate brachytherapy optimizes radiation dose distribution resulting in a favorable acute side effect profile in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Tech Urol 2000;6(2):89–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McTavish J, D’Amico A, Cormack R, Jolesz F, Tempany C. Evaluation of interventional MRI images (0.5T) of the prostate gland compared to endorectal coil MRI images (1.5T) in men undergoing MR guided brachytherapy (abstr), in Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 1999, p. 1972.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hata N, Wells WM III, Warfield S, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA. Computer assisted intraoperative MR-guidedtherapy: pre- intra-operative image registration, enhanced three-dimensional display, deformable registration, in 7th Annual meeting Japan Society of Computer Aided Surgery. Sapporo, Japan; 1997.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Richard WD. Keen CG. Automated texture-based segmentation of ultrasound images of the prostate. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1996;20:131–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wells WM III, Viola P, Atsumi H, Nakajima S, Kikinis R. Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Image Anal 1996;1:35–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Viola P. Wells W. Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Int J Comp Vision 1997;24:137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wells WM III, Viola P, Atsumi H, Nakajima S, Kikinis R. Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Image Anal 1996;1:35–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kagawa K Lee WR, Schultheiss TE, Hunt MA, Shaer AH, Hanks GE. Initial clinical assessment of CT—MRI image fusion software in localization of the prostate for 3D conformal radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;38:319–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Warfield SW, Robatino A, Dengler J, et al. Nonlinear registration and template driven segmentation, in Brain Warping (Toga AW, ed.), Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1999, pp. 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. Totowa, NJ 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clare M. Tempany
  • Steven Haker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations