Skip to main content

Tissue Arrays

  • Chapter
  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

The development of high-throughput technologies, including DNA arrays and proteomics approaches, has led to a tremendous increase in data acquisition. Numerous groups have reported differentially expressed genes and proteins in a variety of normal and malignant tissues. In fact, many groups are using high-throughput techniques to define new tumor classifications. As important genes are identified by various high-throughput technologies, it is critical to correlate these studies with tissue expression to define the precise cell of origin of a particular transcript or protein. In many DNA array experiments, for example, nonpurified cells are used as a starting material. The RNA from cells to be analyzed is commonly admixed with that from a variety of other cells. In the case of tumor tissues, contaminating stromal cells, blood vessels (endothelial cells and smooth muscle), and other normal cells are typically present. It is difficult, therefore, to be certain that a differentially expressed gene is derived from the cell of interest rather than a “contaminating” cell. Some studies have validated findings using standard techniques based on archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues,-including immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH). ISH and IHC are techniques that can localize the expression of a gene or protein to specific cells in tissues. These techniques can be performed with fixed tissues, while fresh or frozen tissue is required for DNA microarray studies. The amount of archival paraffin-embedded tissue far exceeds the tissue that is adequately preserved for RNA or protein extraction and, thus, can be used to expand the scope and significance of these studies. In the past, the use of these standard approaches to analyze the in situ expression of genes or proteins in tissues has been a slow and labor-intensive process, requiring the processing of numerous slides at a rate of one gene product per slide. Furthermore, a significant amount of tissue is required to perform many tests on a single specimen. Although automated stainers from various manufacturers can facilitate these techniques, they are not widely used and may not be of particular use to investigators who work with newly characterized reagents. The use of high density arrays composed of many tissue samples provides a highly efficient means to validate and extend molecular studies of human cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Battifora, H. (1986) The multitumor (sausage) tissue block: novel method for immunohistochemical antibody testing. Lab. Invest. 55, 244–248.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Battifora, H. and Mehta, P. (1990) The checkerboard tissue block. An improved multitissue control block. Lab. Invest. 63, 722–724.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bubendorf, L., Nocito, A., Moch, H., and Sauter, G. (2001) Tissue microarray (TMA) technology: miniaturized pathology archives for high-throughput in situ studies. J. Pathol. 195, 72–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoos, A. and Cordon-Cardo, C. (2001) Tissue microarray profiling of cancer specimens and cell lines: opportunities and limitations. Lab. Invest. 81, 1331–1338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kononen, J., Bubendorf, L., Kallioniemi, A., et al. (1998) Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens. Nat. Med. 4, 844–847.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Camp, R. L., Charette, L. A., and Rimm, D. L. (2000) Validation of tissue microarray technology in breast carcinoma. Lab. Invest. 80, 1943–1949.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schraml, P., Kononen, J., Bubendorf, L., et al. (1999) Tissue microarrays for gene amplification surveys in many different tumor types. Clin. Cancer Res. 5, 1966–1975.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bubendorf, L., Kononen, J., Koivisto, P., et al. (1999) Survey of gene amplifications during prostate cancer progression by high-throughout fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays. Cancer Res. 59, 803–806.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Perrone, E. E., Theoharis, C., Mucci, N. R., et al. (2000) Tissue microarray assessment of prostate cancer tumor proliferation in African-American and white men. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92, 937–939.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hedenfalk, I., Duggan, D., Chen, Y., et al. (2001) Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 539–548.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moch, H Schraml, P., Bubendorf, L., et al. (1999) High-throughput tissue microarray analysis to evaluate genes uncovered by cDNA microarray screening in renal cell carcinoma. Am. J. Pathol. 154 981–986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sallinen, S. L., Sallinen, P. K., Haapasalo, H. K., et al. (2000) Identification of differentially expressed genes in human gliomas by DNA microarray and tissue chip techniques. Cancer Res. 60, 6617–6622.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Werner, M., Chott, A., Fabiano, A., and Battifora, H. (2000) Effect of formalin tissue fixation and processing on immunohistochemistry. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 24, 1016–1019.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schoenberg Fejzo, M. and Slamon, D. J. (2001) Frozen tumor tissue microarray technology for analysis of tumor RNA, DNA, and proteins. Am. J. Pathol. 159, 1645–1650.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoos, A., Urist, M.J.,Stojadinovic, A., et al. (2001) Validation of tissue microarrays for immunohistochemical profiling of cancer specimens using the example of human fibroblastic tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 158, 1245–1251.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mucci, N. R., Akdas, G., Manely, S., and Rubin, M. A. (2000) Neuroendocrine expression in metastatic prostate cancer: evaluation of high throughput tissue microarrays to detect heterogeneous protein expression. Hum. Pathol. 31, 406–414.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Manley, S., Mucci, N. R., De Marzo, A. M., and Rubin, M. A. (2001) Relational database structure to manage high-density tissue microarray data and images for pathology studies focusing on clinical outcome: the prostate specialized program of research excellence model. Am. J. Pathol. 159, 837–843.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hedvat, C.V. (2003). Tissue Arrays. In: Ladanyi, M., Gerald, W.L. (eds) Expression Profiling of Human Tumors. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-386-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-386-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-375-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-386-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics