Skip to main content

Analytical Issues and the Evolution of Cutoff Concentrations for Cardiac Markers

  • Chapter
Cardiac Markers

Part of the book series: Pathology and Laboratory Medicine ((PLM))

  • 178 Accesses

Abstract

Cardiac troponin has been shown to be very useful for the determination of minor myocardial damage (MMD) for patients who present with chest pain. Subsequent outcome studies have shown that patients with an increase in troponin are at high short-term risk (4 wk) for death and myocardial infarction (MI). These clinical trials together with a better understanding of the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have led the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) to formulate a joint committee to redefine the criteria for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (1). Their recommendation was that, in the context of cardiac ischemia, any increase in the concentration of cardiac troponin or creatine kinase (CK) in blood is indicative of AMI. A working subgroup of the ESC/ACC Committee have recommended that the cutoff concentration for cardiac markers be set at the 99% of the reference range (2). However, as summarized in Table 1, the acceptance and implementation of these new standards have been slowed by the continued lack of sensitivity for commercial troponin assays. Another of the major issues is the proper determination of the appropriate cutoff concentrations. These issues are discussed in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Joint ESC/ACC Committee. Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 959–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jaffe AS, Ravkilde J, Roberts R, et al. It’s time to change to a troponin standard. Circulation 2000; 102: 1216–1220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Adams J, Bodor G, Davila-Roman V, et al. Cardiac troponin I: a marker with high specificity for cardiac injury. Circulation 1993; 88: 101–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ishii J, Ishikawa T, Yukitake J. Clinical specificity of a second generation cardiac troponin T assay in patients with chronic renal failure. Clin Chim Acta 1998; 270: 183–188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindahl B, Venge P, Wallentin L. Troponin T identifies patients with unstable coronary artery disease who benefit from long-term antithrombotic protection. Fragmin in Unstable Coronary Artery Disease (FRISC) Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 43–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Tanasijevic M, et al. Cardiac troponin I for stratification of early outcomes and the efficacy of enoxaparin in unstable angina: a TIMI-11B substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1812–1817.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ricchiuti V, Voss EM, Ney A, Odland M, Anderson PAW, Apple FS. Cardiac troponin T isoforms expressed in renal diseased skeletal muscle will not cause false-positive results by the second generation cardiac troponin T assay by Boehringer Mannheim. Clin Chem 1998; 44: 1919–1924.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haller C, Zehelein J, Remppis A, Muller-Bardorff M, Katus HA. Cardiac troponin T in patients with end-stage renal disease: absence of expression in truncal skeletal muscle. Clin Chem 1998; 44: 930–938.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Christenson RH, Vaidya H, Landt Y, et al. Standardization of creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) mass assays: the use of recombinant CK-MB as a reference material. Clin Chem 1999; 45: 1414–1423.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization. Report of the Joint International Society and Federation of Cardiology/World Health Organization Task Force on Standardization of Clinical Nomenclature. Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1979; 59: 607–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 1993; 39: 561–577.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu AHB, Apple FS, Gibler WB, Jesse RL, Warshaw MM, Valdes R Jr. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Standards of Laboratory Practice: recommendations for use of cardiac markers in coronary artery diseases. Clin Chem 1999; 45: 1104–1121.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Apple FS, Wu AHB. Myocardial infarction redefined: role of cardiac troponin testing (editorial). Clin Chem 2001; 47: 377–379.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Spencer CA, Takeuchi M, Kazarosyan M, MacKenzie F, Beckett GJ, Wilkinson E. Interlaboratory/intermethod differences in functional sensitivity of immunometric assays of thyrotropin (TSH) and impact on reliability of measurement of subnormal concentrations of TSH. Clin Chem 1995; 41: 367–374.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Panteghini M, Pagani F. Biological variation of myoglobin in serum (letter). Clin Chem 1997; 42: 2435.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ross SM, Fraser CG. Biological variation of cardiac markers: analytical and clinical considerations. Ann Clin Biochem 1998; 35: 80–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Long GL, Winefordner JD. Limits of detection. A closer look at the IUPAC definition. Analyt Chem 1983; 55: 712A - 719A.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Needleman SB, Romberg RW. Limits of linearity and detection for some drugs of abuse. J Analyt Toxicol 1990; 14: 34–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tate J, Badrick T, Koumantakis G, Potter JM, Hickman PE. Reporting of cardiac troponin concentration. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 2077–2080.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Rifai N, et al. Ability of minor elevations of troponins I and T to predict benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 2001; 286: 2405–2412.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lindahl B, Diderhohn E, Lagerqvist B, Venge P, Wallentin L. Troponin T 0.1 mg/L is an inappropriate cutoff value for risk stratification in unstable coronary artery disease using the new third generation troponin T assay. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 102 (Suppl II): 522.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wu AHB, Apple FS. Reporting of cardiac troponin concentration [letter]. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 2077–2082.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Apple FS, Wu AHB, Jaffe AS. European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology guidelines for redefinition of myocardial infarction: how to use existing assays clinically and for clinical trials. Am Heart J 2002; 144: 981–986.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tunstall-Pedoe H. Redefinition of myocardial infarction by a consensus dissenter. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1472–1473.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Richards AM, Lainchbury JG, Nicholls MG. Unsatisfactory redefinition of myocardial infarction. Lancet 2001; 357: 1635–1636.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Norris RIVI. Dissent from the consensus on the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 1626–1627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tormey W, Birkhead JS, Norris RM, Jolobe OMP. Redefinition of myocardial infarction. Lancet 2001; 358: 764.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wu, A.H.B. (2003). Analytical Issues and the Evolution of Cutoff Concentrations for Cardiac Markers. In: Wu, A.H.B. (eds) Cardiac Markers. Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-385-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-385-9_14

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-319-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-385-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics