Skip to main content

Care Home Ethics

  • Chapter
Care of the Aged

Part of the book series: Biomedical Ethics Reviews ((BER))

  • 164 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we reflect on the ethics of caring for older people in residential care, a complex but underdiscussed field. One of the central questions we address is that of what constitutes a good reason for intervening in the life of another. This issue is something of a classic, being central to politics and ethics, but what is written about such issues on the grand scale often seems lacking when applied to specific contexts. In this chapter, we will explore the general questions concerning the moral boundaries in caring for older people that are raised in the context of residential care.

How should we respect the autonomy of the old when they, sometimes by their own admission, need assistance with living? What exactly does a change in status from private to communal residence imply in terms of the rights of the individual resident and the duties and obligations of the institution? Does the mere fact that a person recognizes their reduced independence in some areas of their life represent sufficient reason to assume consent for others to direct and control it? What intuitions form the basis of our moral duty of care in this context and do those intuitions withstand scrutiny? Are there instances when this same moral duty of care requires us to allow people to choose the nature and timing of their own ending?

In addressing these questions, we explore the ethical underpinnings of the regulative principles for the care of older people and the intuitions that inform them. We also offer a moral rule of thumb to guide us in judging the fine line between justified and unjustified intervention in the lives of others. To focus our discussion, we begin with a case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nora Goldfarb is a factitious character (i.e., a fiction loosely based on the facts of real incident).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rex. parte Pretty v DPP [2001] UKHL 61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The House of Lords Select Committee On Medical Ethics (1994) HL Paper 21–1, p. 49 para. 239

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mill, J. S. (1859) (Original data) On liberty, in Warnock, M., ed. (1977) (Edited version) Utilitarianism Fontana, Glasgow, p. 135

    Google Scholar 

  5. Waldron J. (1987) The theoretical foundations of liberalism. Phil. Q. 37, 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dworkin, R. (1993) Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia and Individual Freedom, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mill Utilitarianism, p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mill Utilitarianism, p. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feinberg, J. (1992) The child’s right to an open future, in Freedom and Fulfillment, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 76–98.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Department of Health (1999) Our Healthier Nation: Saving Lives, Department of Health, London, Executive Summary, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. This rather presumes that quality of life diminishes in old age when, quite feasibly, it might improve.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Buxton, M. and Ashby, J. (1988): The time trade-off approach to health state evaluation, in Measuring Health: A Practical Approach Teeling Smith, G., ed., Wiley, London, pp. 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sandman, L. (2001) A Good Death: On the Value of Death and Dying, Acta Philosophica Gothoburgensia 12, Kompendiet, Goteborg.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tannsjo, T. (2000) Terminal sedation: a compromise in the euthanasia debate? Bull Med. Ethics 163, 13–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris, J. (2000) Intimations of immortality. Science, 288(5463), 59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1980) Declaration on Euthanasia, Vatican, Vatican City.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woods, S., Elstein, M. (2003). Care Home Ethics. In: Humber, J.M., Almeder, R.F. (eds) Care of the Aged. Biomedical Ethics Reviews. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-349-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-349-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-444-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-349-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics