Abstract
There is consensus that our current system of delivering health care, with its institutional bias, fragmentation, excessive costs, and focus on acute care has not been a success for the frail elderly. Our standard ethics methods are equally unworkable: For the frail elderly living in the community, a standard principle approach to resolving ethical dilemmas is problematic and difficult to apply.
Although there are many similarities in the types of ethical issues encountered in acute care and in the community (e.g., conflicting goals of treatment, nonbeneficial treatment, and end-of-life issues), significant differences in the contextual circumstances limit the usefulness of the standard ethical frameworks. There are distinctions about the very old living in the community that require a new approach to ethics in order to illuminate their problems. Bioethics has tended to focus on grand events and dramatic decisions. However, away from the hospital, in the community, ethical issues affecting the elderly are more likely to be found in the daily routines of life.
When ethical challenges arise in the community, what is required is an approach to ethical case consultation that gives value to the many positive aspects of providing care there while recognizing that the duties of health care providers remain, even outside the institutional setting, and must be respected and upheld. This chapter describes and applies an alternative set of principles to use in resolving the ethical dilemmas encountered when providing health care to elders residing in the community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Moody, H. (1992) Ethics in an Aging Society, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Beauchamp, T. A. and Childress, J. F. (1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, New York.
Bectel, R., ed. (1998) Across the States, Profiles of Long-Term Care Systems, AARP, Washington, DC.
Collopy, B., Dubler, N., and Zuckerman, C. (1990) The Ethics of Home Care: Autonomy and Accommodation, Hastings Center Report, March/April.
Hansen, J. C. (1999) Practical lessons for delivering integrated services in a changing environment: the PACE model. Generations 22–28.
Clark, M. (1999) Integrated acute and long-term care and service delivery financing. PACE Profile.
Moody, H. (1992) Ethics in an Aging Society, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
DuBose, E. R., Hamel, R., O’Connell, L. J., eds. (1994) A Matter of Principles ? Ferment in US Bioethics. The Park Ridge Center for the Study of Health, Faith, and Ethics, Trinity Press International.
Kuczewski, M. (1999) Ethics in long-term care: are the principles different? Theoret. Med. 20, 15–29.
Sanders, C. (1994) European-American ethos and principlism: an African-American challenge, in A Matter of Principles? Ferment in US Bioethics, Dubose, E., ed., Trinity Press International, Valley Forge, PA, pp. 148–163.
Noelker, L. (1990) Family caregivers: a valuable but vulnerable resource, in The Vulnerable Aged, People, Services, and Policies, Harel, Z., ed., Springer, New York, pp. 189–204.
LaPuma, J. and Schiedermayer, D. (1994) Ethics Consultation, A Practical Guide, Jones and Bartlett, Boston, pp. 100–128.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCarthy, S. (2003). Resolving Ethical Dilemmas in Community-Based Care. In: Humber, J.M., Almeder, R.F. (eds) Care of the Aged. Biomedical Ethics Reviews. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-349-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-349-1_4
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-444-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-349-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive