Abstract
The discovery and development of anticancer agents is undergoing revolutionary change. This change is characterized by the rapid transition from the classic cytotoxic and hormonal agents of the past toward drugs that are designed specifically to correct the precise molecular abnormalities that are responsible for the causation and progression of human tumors. Three major factors are contributing to this paradigm shift. The first is the recognition that further refinement of classic agents will not result in a stepjump in clinical utility. The second factor is our increasingly detailed understanding of the molecular pathology of cancer in terms of the genetic mutations, altered gene expression, and the resultant deregulation of cognate biochemical pathways. The third factor is the range of technologic breakthroughs used to accelerate contemporary drug discovery, particularly genomics, high-throughput screening, combinatorial chemistry, and modern structural biology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Workman P. Introduction: new anticancer drug design and discovery based on advances in molecular oncology. Semin Cancer Biol. 1992; 3: 329–33.
Bishop JM. Molecular themes in oncogenesis. Cell. 1991; 64: 235–48.
Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature. 1998; 396: 643–9.
Stevens MFG. Is there a future for the small molecule in developmental cancer therapy? In: The Search for New Anticancer Drugs. ( Waring MJ, Ponder BAJ, eds.), Kluwer, Dordsecht, 1992, pp. 1–17.
Jain RK. Deliveryof novel therapeutic agents in tumors: physiological barriers and strategies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989; 81: 570–6.
PhRMA Web site. Available at:http://www.phrma.org. Accessed May 4, 1999.
Food and Drug Administration Web Site. Available at:http://www.fda.gov/fdae/special/ne. Accessed May 4, 1999.
Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC. Drug therapy: paclitaxel (Taxol®). N Engl J Med. 1995; 332: 1004–14.
Lander ES. The new genomics: global views of biology. Science. 1996; 274: 536–9.
Nat Genet. (Suppl.) 21, January 1999.
Collins FS, Patrinos A, Jordan E, Chakravarti A, Gesteland R, Walters L. New goals for the U.S. Human Genome Project: 1998–2003. Science. 1998; 282: 682–9.
Waterston R, Sulston JE. The human genome project: reaching the finish line. Science. 1998; 282: 53–54.
Anderson WF, Field C, Venter JC. Mammalian gene studies: editorial overview. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1994; 5: 577–8.
Harris TJ, Rosen CA. Editorial overview: genetics, genomics and drug discovery. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1994; 5: 637–8.
Murray-Rust P. Bioinformatics and drug discovery. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1994; 5: 648–53.
Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 1990; 61: 759–67.
Zhang L, Zhou W, Velculescu VE, et al. Gene expression profiles in normal and cancer cells. Science. 1997; 276: 1268–72.
Hacia JG. Resequencing and mutational analysis using oligonucleotide microarrays. Nat. Genet. 1999; 21: 42–47.
Drews J. Genomic sciences and the medicine of tomorrow. Nat Biotechnol. 1996; 14: 1516–18.
Workman P. The potential for molecular oncology to define new drug targets. In: New Molecular Targets for Cancer Chemotherapy ( Kerr DJ, Workman P, eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1994, p. 1.
Gibbs JB, Oliff A. Pharmaceutical research in molecular oncology. Cell. 1994; 79: 193–8.
Oliff A, Gibbs JB, McCormick F. New molecular targets for cancer therapy. Sci Am. 1996; September: 110–5.
Marshall CJ. Opportunities for pharmacological intervention in the ras pathway. Ann Oncol. 1995; 6 (Suppl 1): S63–S67.
Lerner EC, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. Inhibition of Ras prenylation: a signaling target for novel anti-cancer drug design. Anticancer Drug Des. 1997; 12: 229–38.
Terrett NK, Gardner M, Gordon DW, Kobylecki RJ, Steele J. Combinatorial synthesis— the design of compound libraries and their application to drug discovery. Tetrahedron. 1995; 51: 8135–73.
Bevan P, Ryder H, Shaw I. Identifying small-molecule lead compounds: the screening approach to drug discovery. Trends in Biotechnology. 1995; 13: 115–21.
Workman P. Towards intelligent anticancer drug screening in the post-genome era? Anticancer Drug Des. 1997; 12: 525–31.
Blundell TL. Structure-based drug design. Nature. 1996; 384: 23–26.
Workman P. Pharmacokinetics and cancer: successes, failures and future prospects. Cancer Surv. 1993; 17: 1–26.
Olah TV, McLoughlin DA, Gilbert JD. The simultaneous determination of mixtures of drug candidates by liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry as an in vivo drug screening procedure. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1997; 11: 17–23.
Brown JM, Workman P. Partition coefficient as a guide to the development of radiosensitizers which are less toxic than misonidazole. Radiat Res. 1990; 82: 171–90.
Workman P, Brown JM. Structure–pharmacokinetic relationships for misonidazole analogues in mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1981; 6: 39–49.
Mayer JM, van de Waterbeemd H. Development of quantitative structure–pharmacokinetic relationships. Environ Health Perspect. 1985; 61: 295–306.
Rowland M. Pharmacokinetics-QSAR: definitions, concepts, and models. In Quantitative Approaches to Drug Design ( Dearden JC, ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 155–61.
Rishton GM. Reactive compounds and in vitro false positives in HTS. Drug Discov Today. 1997; 2: 382.
Current Drugs. Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics symposium. ID weekly highlights Current Drugs Ltd, p. 25, September 1998.
Monks A, Scudiero DA, Johnson GS, Paull KD, Sausville EA. The NCI anti-cancer drug screen: a smart screen to identify effectors of novel targets. Anticancer Drug Des. 1997; 12: 533–41.
Skelton LA, Ormerod MG, Titley J, Kimbell R, Brunton LA, Jackman AL. A novel class of lipophilic quinazoline-based folic acid analogues: cytotoxic agents with a folate-independent locus. Br J Cancer. 1999; 79: 1692–701.
Bradshaw TD, Wrigley S, Shi DF, Schultz RJ, Paull KD, Stevens MF. 2-(4-Aminophenyl) benzothiazoles: novel agents with selective profiles of in vitro anti-tumour activity. Br J Cancer. 1998; 77: 745–52.
Greengrass CW. Devising a research strategy. In: Medicinal Chemistry: Principles and Practice ( King FD, ed.), Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1994, pp. 179–188.
Gura T. Systems for identifying new drugs are often faulty. Science. 1997; 278: 1041–2.
Burtles SS, Jodrell DI, Newell DR. Evaluation of “rodent only” preclinical toxicology for phase I trials of new cancer treatments—The Cancer Research Campaign (CRC) experience. Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res. 1998; 39: 363.
Newlands ES, Stevens MF, Wedge SR, Wheelhouse RT, Brock C. Temozolomide: a review of its discovery, chemical properties, pre-clinical development and clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 1997; 23: 35–61.
Graham MA, Kaye SB. New approaches in preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetics. Cancer Surv. 1993; 17: 27–49.
Collins JM, Zaharko DS, Dedrick RL, Chabner BA. Potential roles for preclinical pharmacology in phase I clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep. 1986; 70: 73–80.
Graham MA, Workman P. The impact of pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation strategies in phase I clinical trials: clinical evaluation and recommendations for future studies. Ann Oncol. 1992; 3: 339–347.
O’Quigley J, Pepe M, Fisher L. Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics. 1990; 46: 33–48.
Simon R, Freidlin B, Rubinstein L, Arbuck SG, Collins J, Christian MC. Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology. JNatl CancerInst. 1997; 89: 1138–47.
Maxwell RJ. New techniques in pharmacokinetic analysis of cancer drugs III: nuclear magnetic resonance. Cancer Surv. 1983; 17: 415–423.
Tilsley DW, Harte RJ, Jones T, et al. New techniques in the pharmacokinetic analysis of cancer drugs. IV. Positron emission tomography. Cancer Surv. 1993; 17: 425–42.
Workman P, Maxwell RJ, Griffiths JR. Non-invasive MRS in new anticancer drug development. NMR Biomed. 1992; 5: 270–2.
Workman P. Bottlenecks in anticancer drug discovery and development: in vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues and the potential role of PET. In: PETfor Drug Development and Evaluation ( Komar D, ed.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1995, p. 277.
Workman P, Brunton VG, Robins DJ. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Semin Cancer Biol. 1992; 3: 369–81.
Fry DW. Protein tyrosine kinases as therapeutic targets in cancer chemotherapy and recent advances in the development of new inhibitors. Exp Opin Invest Drugs. 1994; 3: 577–95.
Levitzki A, Gazit A. Tyrosine kinase inhibition: an approach to drug development. Science. 1995; 267: 1782–8.
Patrick DR, Heimbrook PC. Protein kinase inhibitors for the treatment of cancer. Drug Discov Today. 1996; 1: 325–30.
Strawn LM, Shawver LK. Tyrosine kinases in disease. Exp Opin Invest Drugs. 1998; 7: 553.
Hunter T. A thousand and one protein kinases. Cell. 1987; 50: 823–9.
Hunter T. Oncoprotein networks. Cell. 1997; 88: 333–46.
Brunton VG, Carlin S, Workman P. Alterations in EGF-dependent proliferative and phosphorylation events in squamous cell carcinoma cell lines by a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Anticancer Drug Des. 1994; 9: 311–29.
McLeod HL, Brunton VG, Eckardt N, et al. In vivo pharmacology and anti-tumour evaluation of the tyrphostin tyrosine kinase inhibitor RG13022. Br J Cancer. 1996; 74: 1714–18.
Meydan N, Grunberger T, Dadi H, et al. Inhibition of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by a Jak-2 inhibitor. Nature. 1996; 379: 645–8.
Mohammadi M, McMahon G, Sun L, et al. Structures of the tyrosine kinase domain of fibroblast growth factor receptor in complex with inhibitors. Science. 1997; 276: 955–60.
Fry DW, Kraker AJ, McMichael A, et al. A specific inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Science. 1994; 265: 1093–5.
Ward WHJ, Cook PN, Slater AM, Davies DH, Holdgate GA, Green LR. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994; 48: 659–66.
Wakeling AE, Barker AJ, Davies DH, et al. Specific inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase by 4-anilinoquinazolines. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996; 38: 67–73.
Wakeling AE, Barker AJ, Davies DH, et al. New targets for therapeutic attack. Endocrin. Rel Cancer. 1997; 4: 351–5.
Boyle FT, Costello GF. Cancer therapy: a move to the molecular level. Chem Soc Rev. 1998; 27: 251–61.
Current Drugs. ZD-1839—an EGF receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. ID weekly highlights Current Drugs Ltd, p. 45, April 1998.
Woodburn JR, Barker AJ, Gibson KH, et al. ZD 1839, an epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor selected for clinical development. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res. 1997; 38: 633 (abstr.)
Kelly HC, Laight A, Morris CQ, Woodburn JR, Richmond GHP. Phase I data of ZD1839— an oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Proceedings of the 10th International NCI Symposium in New Drugs in Cancer Therapy 1998; 109.
Iwata K, Miller PE, Barbacci EG, Arnold L, Doty J, DiOrio CI, Pustilnik LR, Reynolds M, Thelemann A, Sloan D, Moyer JD. CP-358,774: A selective EGFR kinase inhibitor with potent antiproliferative activity against HN5 head and neck tumor cells. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res. 1997; 38: 633 (abstr.).
Senderowicz AM, Headlee D, Stinson SF, Lush RM, Kalil N, Villalba L, Hill K, Steinberg SM, Figg WD, Tompkins A, Arbuch SG, Sausville EA. Phase I trial of continuous infusion flavopiridol, a novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, in patients with refractory neoplasms. J Clin Onc. 1998; 16: 2986–2999.
Gray NS, Wodicka L, Thunnissen AM, Morgan DO, Barnes G, LeClerc S, Meijer L, Kim S-H, Lockhart DJ, Schultz PG. Exploiting chemical libraries, structure and genomics in the search for kinase inhibitors. Science. 1998; 281: 533–8.
Shayesteh L, Lu Y, Baldocchi R, Godfrey T, Collins C, Pinkel D, Powell B, Mills GB, Gray JW. PIK3CA is implicated as an oncogene in ovarian cancer. Nat Genet. 1999; 21: 99–102.
Whitesell L, Mimnaugh EG, DeCosta B, Myers CE, Neckers LM. Inhibition of heat-shock protein HSP90-pp60v-src heteroprotein complex-formation by benzoquinone ansamycins: essential role for stress proteins in oncogenic transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994; 91: 8324–8.
Prodromou C, Roe SM, O’Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, Pearl LH. Identification and structural characterization of the ATP/ADP-binding site in the Hsp90 molecular chaperone. Cell. 1997; 90: 65–75.
Schulte TW, Neckers LM. The benzoquinone ansamycin 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin binds to HSP90 and shares important biologic activities with geldanamycin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1998; 42: 273–9.
Egorin MJ, Rosen DM, Wolff JH, Callery PS, Musser SM, Eiseman JL. Metabolism of 17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (NSC 330507) by murine and human hepatic preparations. Cancer Res. 1998; 58: 2385–96.
Scrip No 2374 September 30th, p. 20 1998.
Page MJ, Amess B, Rohlff C, Stubberfield C, Parekh R. Proteomics: a major new technology for the drug discovery process. Drug Discov Today. 1999; 4: 55–62.
Workman P. Cell proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis targets for cancer drug discovery: Strategies, strengths and pitfalls. In: Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Control. Basic Mechanisms and Implications for Treating Malignant Disease. Bios, Oxford, 1996, p. 205.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Workman, P. (2000). Emerging Molecular Therapies. In: Bronchud, M.H., Foote, M.A., Peters, W.P., Robinson, M.O. (eds) Principles of Molecular Oncology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-222-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-222-7_17
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6274-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-222-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive