Skip to main content

Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer

Endorectal Ultrasound and Endorectal MRI

  • Chapter
Colorectal Cancer

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Oncology ((CCO))

  • 244 Accesses

Abstract

The treatment algorithm for rectal cancer has changed markedly over the last decade. Radical surgery, either low anterior resection or abdominal perineal resection, is no longer the initial or only therapy for the majority of patients with rectal carcinoma. The reason for this is twofold: First, in both nonrandomized and randomized studies, preoperative multimodality treatment has been found to decrease the local recurrence rate and result in significant downstaging in patients with rectal tumors; second, local excision of rectal tumors has become the preferred treatment in highly selected, early-stage patients. Because of this, preoperative staging has become increasingly important in order to direct patients into the appropriate treatment arm. In addition, in patients who are downstaged after undergoing preoperative chemoradiation, postoperative decisions regarding further chemotherapy are often dependent on the preoperative stage alone. Therefore, it is imperative to have easily available, accurate preoperative imaging studies in order to assess not only the depth of penetration but also the presence of involved lymph nodes. In addition, before embarking on expensive and often physically demanding preoperative therapies, it is important to assure the absence of metastatic disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Starck M, Bohe M, Fork FT, Lindstrom C, and Sjoberg S. Endoluminal ultrasound and low-field magnetic resonance imaging are superior to clinical examination in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Eur. J. Surg., 161 (11) (1995) 841–845.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nicholls RJ, Mason AY, Morson BC, Dixon AK, and Fry IK. The clinical staging of rectal cancer. Br. J. Surg., 69 (7) (1982) 404–409.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beynon J, Mortensen NJ, Foy DM, Channer JL, Virjee J, and Goddard P. Pre-operative assessment of local invasion in rectal cancer: digital examination, endoluminal sonography or computed tomography? Br. J. Surg., 73 (12) (1986) 1015–1017.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D, Chalmers AG, Chennells P, Dixon MF, Finan PJ, et al. Endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in the staging of rectal cancer. Br. J. Surg., 75 (10) (1988) 1019–1022.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zerhouni EA, Rutter C, Hamilton SR, Balfe DM, Megibow AJ, Francis IR, et al. CT and MR imaging in the staging of colorectal carcinoma: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group II. Radiology, 200 (2) (1996) 443–451.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thaler W, Watzka S, Martin F, La Guardia G, Psenner K, Bonatti G, et al. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary results of a prospective, comparative study. Dis. Colon Rectum, 37 (12) (1994) 1189–1193.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guinet C, Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Sezeur A, Mallet A, Bigot JM, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Arch. Surg., 125 (3) (1990) 385–388.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hildebrandt U, Feifel G, Schwarz HP, and Scherr O. Endorectal ultrasound: instrumentation and clinical aspects. Intl. J. Colorect. Dis., 1 (4) (1986) 203–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beynon J, Foy DM, Roe AM, Temple LN, and Mortensen NJ. Endoluminal ultrasound in the assessment of local invasion in rectal cancer. Br. J. Surg., 73 (6) (1986) 474–477.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Orrom WJ, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Jensen LL, and Goldberg SM. Endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal tumors. A learning experience. Dis. Colon Rectum, 33 (8) (1990) 654–659.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beynon J, Mortensen NJ, Foy DM, Channer JL, Virjee J, and Goddard R. Endorectal sonography: laboratory and clinical experience in Bristol. Intl. J. Colorect. Dis., 1 (4) (1986) 212–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boscaini M, Moscini PL, and Montori A. Transrectal ultrasonography: interpretation of normal intestinal wall structure for the preoperative staging of rectal cancer [published erratum appears in Scand. J. Gastroenterol. (9) preceding 1025]. Scand. J Gastroenterol., 123 (Suppl.) (1986) 87–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hildebrandt U and Feifel G. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by intrarectal ultrasound. Dis. Colon Rectum, 28 (1) (1985) 42–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang KY, Kimmey MB, Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Haggitt RC, Shuman WP, et al. Colorectal neoplasms: accuracy of US in demonstrating the depth of invasion. Radiology, 165 (3) (1987) 827–829.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schaldenbrand JD, Siders DB, Zainea GG, and Thieme ET. Preoperative radiation therapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the rectum. Clinicopathologic correlative review. Dis. Colon Rectum, 35 (1) (1992) 16–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Garcia-Aguilar J, Mellgren A, Sirivongs P, Buie D, Madoff RD, and Rothenberger DA. Local excision of rectal cancer without adjuvant therapy: a word of caution. Ann. Surg., 231 (3) (2000) 345–351.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson BO, Hann LE, Enker WE, Dershaw DD, Guillem JG, and Cohen AM. Transrectal ultrasonography and operative selection for early carcinoma of the rectum. J. Am. Col. Surg., 179 (5) (1994) 513–517.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Minsky BD, Enker WE, Cohen AM, and Lauwers G. Local excision and postoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer. Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 17 (5) (1994) 411–416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Steele GD, Jr, Herndon JE, Bleday R, Russell A, Benson A III, Hussain M, et al. Sphincter-sparing treatment for distal rectal adenocarcinoma [see comments]. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 6 (5) (1999) 433–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rifkin MD, McGlynn ET, and Marks G. Endorectal sonographic prospective staging of rectal cancer. Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 123 (Suppl.) (1986) 99–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saitoh N, Okui K, Sarashina H, Suzuki M, Arai T, and Nunomura M. Evaluation of echographic diagnosis of rectal cancer using intrarectal ultrasonic examination. Dis. Colon Rectum, 29 (4) (1986) 234–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Beynon J, Mortensen NJ, Foy DM, Channer JL, Rigby H, and Virjee J. Preoperative assessment of mesorectal lymph node involvement in rectal cancer. Br. J. Surg., 76 (3) (1989) 276–279.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dworak O. Number and size of lymph nodes and node metastases in rectal carcinomas. Surgi. Endoscopy, 3 (2) (1989) 96–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hildebrandt U, Klein T, Feifel G, Schwarz HP, Koch B, and Schmitt RM. Endosonography of pararectal lymph nodes. In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Dis. Colon Rectum, 33 (10) (1990) 863–868.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Habr-Gama A, de Souza PM, Ribeiro U, Jr., Nadalin W, Gansl R, Sousa AH Jr, et al. Low rectal cancer: impact of radiation and chemotherapy on surgical treatment. Dis. Colon Rectum, 41 (9) (1998) 1087–1096.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hiotis SP, Weber SM, Cohen AM, Minsky BD, Paty PB, Guillem JG, et al. Assessing the predictive value of clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: an analysis of 488 patients J. Am. Coll. Surg., 194 (2) (2002) 131–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Glaser F, Kuntz C, Schlag P, and Herfarth C. Endorectal ultrasound for control of preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer. Ann. Surg., 217 (1) (1993) 64–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bernini A, Deen KI, Madoff RD, and Wong WD. Preoperative adjuvant radiation with chemotherapy for rectal cancer: its impact on stage of disease and the role of endorectal ultrasound. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 3 (2) (1996) 131–135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dershaw DD, Enker WE, Cohen AM, and Sigurdson ER. Transrectal ultrasonography of rectal carcinoma. Cancer, 66 (11) (1990) 2336–2340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Beynon J, Mortensen NJ, Foy DM, Channer JL, Rigby H, and Virjee J. The detection and evaluation of locally recurrent rectal cancer with rectal endosonography. Dis. Colon Rectum, 32 (6) (1989) 509–517.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mascagni D, Corbellini L, Urciuoli P, and Di Matteo G. Endoluminal ultrasound for early detection of local recurrence of rectal cancer [see comments]. Br. J. Surg., 76 (11) (1989) 1176–1180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Adams DR, Blatchford GJ, Lin KM, Ternent CA, Thorson AG, and Christensen MA. Use of preoperative ultrasound staging for treatment of rectal cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum, 42 (2) (1999) 159–166.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Glaser F, Schlag P, and Herfarth C. Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of invasion of rectal tumours and lymph node involvement. Br. J. Surg., 77 (8) (1990) 883–887.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Heneghan JP, Salem RR, Lange RC, Taylor KJ, and Hammers LW. Transrectal sonography in staging rectal carcinoma: the role of gray-scale, color-flow, and Doppler imaging analysis. Am. J. Roentgenol., 169 (5) (1997) 1247–1252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chan TW, Kressel HY, Milestone B, Tomachefski J, Schnall M, Rosato E, et al. Rectal carcinoma: staging at MR imaging with endorectal surface coil [work in progress]. Radiology, 181 (2) (1991) 461–467.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Drew PJ, Farouk R, Turnbull LW, Ward SC, Hartley JE, and Monson JR. Preoperative magnetic resonance staging of rectal cancer with an endorectal coil and dynamic gadolinium enhancement. Br. J. Surg., 86 (2) (1999) 250–254.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Meyenberger C, Huch Boni RA, Bertschinger P, Zala GF, Klotz HP, and Krestin GR Endoscopie ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Endoscopy, 27 (7) (1995) 469–479.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schnall MD, Furth EE, Rosato EF, and Kressel HY. Rectal tumor stage: correlation of endorectal MR imaging and pathologic findings [see comments]. Radiology, 190 (3) (1994) 709–714.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gualdi GF, Casciani E, Guadalaxara A, d’Orta C, Polettini E, and Pappalardo G. Local staging of rectal cancer with transrectal ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with histologic findings. Dis. Colon Rectum, 43 (3) (2000) 338–345.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Murano A, Sasaki F, Kido C, Nakamura T, Kobayashi S, Kato T, et al. Endoscopie MRI using 3D-spoiled GRASS (SPGR) sequence for local staging of rectal carcinoma. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 19 (4) (1995) 586–591.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim NK, Kim MJ, Yun SH, Sohn SK, and Min JS. Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum, 42 (6) (1999) 770–775.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Maldjian C, Smith R, Kilger A, Schnall M, Ginsberg G, and Kochman M. Endorectal surface coil MR imaging as a staging technique for rectal carcinoma: a comparison study to rectal endosonography. Abdom. Imaging, 25 (1) (2000) 75–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zagoria RJ, Schlarb CA, Ott DJ, Bechtold RI, Wolfman NT, Scharling ES, et al. Assessment of rectal tumor infiltration utilizing endorectal MR imaging and comparison with endoscopie rectal sonography. J. Surg. Oncol., 64 (4) (1997) 312–317.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Brown G, Richards CJ, Newcombe RG, Dallimore NS, Radcliffe AG, Carey DP, et al. Rectal carcinoma: thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients. Radiology, 211 (1) (1999) 215–222.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. de Lange EE, Fechner RE, Edge SB, and Spaulding CA. Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma with MR imaging: surgical and histopathologic correlation [see comments]. Radiology, 176 (3) (1990) 623–628.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. de Lange EE, Fechner RE, Spaulding CA, and Edge SB. Rectal carcinoma treated by preoperative irradiation: MR imaging and histopathologic correlation. Am. J. Roentgenol., 158 (2) (1992) 287–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pema PJ, Bennett WF, Bova JG, and Warman P. CT vs MRI in diagnosis of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 18 (2) (1994) 256–261.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Blomqvist L, Holm T, Goranson H, Jacobsson H, Ohlsen H, and Larsson SA. MR imaging, CT and CEA scintigraphy in the diagnosis of local recurrence of rectal carcinoma. Acta Radiol., 37 (5) (1996) 779–784.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Krestin GP, Steinbrich W, and Friedmann G. Recurrent rectal cancer: diagnosis with MR imaging versus CT. Radiology, 168 (2) (1988) 307–311.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Huch Boni RA, Meyenberger C, Pok LJ, Trinkler F, Lutolf U, and Krestin GP. Value of endorectal coil versus body coil MRI for diagnosis of recurrent pelvic malignancies. Abdom. Imaging, 21 (4) (1996) 345–352.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Markus J, Morrissey B, deGara C, and Tarulli G. MRI of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma [see comments]. Abdom. Imaging, 22 (3) (1997) 338–342.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ito K, Kato T, Tadokoro M, Ishiguchi T, Oshima M, Ishigaki T, et al. Recurrent rectal cancer and scar: differentiation with PET and MR imaging. Radiology, 182 (2) (1992) 549–552.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hiotis, S., Weber, S., Wong, W.D. (2002). Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer. In: Saltz, L.B. (eds) Colorectal Cancer. Current Clinical Oncology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-160-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-160-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9670-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-160-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics