Skip to main content

Medical Treatment for Cardiogenic Shock

  • Chapter
Cardiogenic Shock

Part of the book series: Contemporary Cardiology ((CONCARD))

  • 162 Accesses

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock occurs in 7–10% of patients with acute myocardial infarction and is usually associated with extensive infarction of the left ventricle. It has remained the leading cause of death among patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era (1,2), although changes in treatment in recent years have reduced the mortality rate. For instance, the long-term Worcester Heart Attack Study of patients from all hospitals in Worcester, Massachusetts reported that the mortality rate from cardiogenic shock (defined throughout as a systolic blood pressure of <80 mm Hg and evidence of end-organ hypoperfusion in the absence of hypovolemia) fell from an average of 77% prior to 1993 to approx 60% in 1993–1997, whereas the use of revascularization procedures increased from 10% to 42%, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) from 16% to 42%, and thrombolytic therapy from 8% (in 1986–1988) to 25% (Fig. 1) (3). The report did not, however, elaborate on what changes may have occurred since 1975 in the timing of therapies relative to the onset of shock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berger PB, Holmes DR Jr, Stebbins AL, et al. Impact of an aggressive invasive catheterization and revascularization strategy on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) Trial: an observational study. Circulation 1997; 96: 122–127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. White HD. Cardiogenic shock: a more aggressive approach is now warranted [editorial]. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1897–1901.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg RJ, Samad NA, Yarzebski J, et al. Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1162–1168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 625–634.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1986; :397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists (FTT) Collaborative Group. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet 1994; 343: 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sanborn TA, Sleeper LA, Bates ER, et al. Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counter-pulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1123–129.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobs AK, French JK, Col J, et al. Cardiogenic shock with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1091–1096.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. French JK, Williams BF, Hart HH, et al. Prospective evaluation of eligibility for thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Br Med J 1996; 312: 1637–1641.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD, et al. One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. JAMA 2001; 285: 190–192.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. White HD. Future of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction [editorial]. Lancet 1999; 354: 695–697.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Andrews J, Straznicky IT, French JK, et al. ST-segment recovery adds to the assessment of TIMI 2 and 3 flow in predicting infarct wall motion after thrombolytic therapy. Circulation 2000; 101: 2138–2143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Scheidt S, Wilner G, Mueller H, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1973; 288: 979–984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gurbel PA, Anderson RD, MacCord CS, et al. Arterial diastolic pressure augmentation by intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation enhances the onset of coronary artery reperfusion by thrombolytic therapy. Circulation 1994; 89: 361–365.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Silverman AJ, Williams AM, Wetmore RW, et al. Complications of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation insertion in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. J Interven Cardiol 1991; 4: 49–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Waksman R, Weiss AT, Gotsman MS, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation improves survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1993; 14: 71–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stomel RJ, Rasak M, Bates ER. Treatment strategies for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in a community hospital. Chest 1994; 105: 997–1002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kovack PJ, Rasak MA, Bates ER, et al. Thrombolysis plus aortic counterpulsation: improved survival in patients who present to community hospitals in cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1454–1458.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barron HV, Every NR, Parsons LS, et al. The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Am Heart J 2001; 141: 933–939.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Holmes DR Jr, Califf RM, Van de Werf F, et al. Difference in countries’ use of resources and clinical outcome for patients with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO Trial. Lancet 1997; 349: 75–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hudson MP, Granger CB, Stebbins AL, et al. Cardiogenic shock survival and use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the GUSTO I and III Trials [abstract]. Circulation 1999; 100 (Suppl I): I - 370.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ohman EM, Nanas J, Stomel R, et al. A prospective randomized trial of thrombolysis and counterpulsation to improve cardiogenic shock survival: preliminary results of the TACTICS Trial [abstract]. Eur Heart J 2000; 21 (Abstract Suppl): 15.

    Google Scholar 

  23. French JK, Miller D, Palmieri S, et al. Cardiogenic shock treated with thrombolytic therapy and intra-aortic balloon counter pulsation: a report from the SHOCK Trial [abstract]. Circulation 1999; 100 (Suppl I): I - 370.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Granger CB, Hirsh J, Califf RM, et al. Activated partial thromboplastin time and outcome after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO-I Trial. Circulation 1996; 93: 870–878.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Samama MM, Cohen AT, Darmon J-Y, et al. A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 793–800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Guyatt G. A randomized control trial of right-heart catheterization in critically ill patients: Ontario Intensive Care Study Group. J Intensive Care Med 1991; 6: 91–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Connors AFJ, Speroff T, Dawson NV, et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA 1996; 276: 889–897.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hasdai D, Holmes DR Jr, Califf RM, et al. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: predictors of death. Am Heart J 1999; 138: 21–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Menon V, Sleeper LA, Fincke R, et al. Outcomes with pulmonary artery catheterization in cardiogenic shock [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31 (Suppl A): 397A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. The CAPTURE Investigators. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of abciximab before and during coronary intervention in refractory unstable angina: the CAPTURE Study. Lancet 1997; 349: 1429–1435.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Topol EJ, Calif RM, Weisman HF, et al. Randomised trial of coronary intervention with antibody against platelet IIb/IIIa integrin for reduction of clinical restenosis: results at six months. Lancet 1994; 343: 881–886.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. The EPILOG Investigators. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1689–1696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Topol EJ, Mark DB, Lincoff AM, et al. Outcomes at 1 year and economic implications of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade in patients undergoing coronary stenting: results from a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 2019–2024.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. The ESPRIT Investigators. Novel dosing regimen of eptifibatide in planned coronary stent implantation (ESPRIT): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 2037–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. The EPISTENT Investigators. Randomised placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. Lancet 1998; 352: 87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Antman EM, Giugliano RP Gibson CM, et al. Abciximab facilitates the rate and extent of thrombolysis: results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 14 Trial. Circulation 1999; 99: 2720–2732.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Topol EJ, Yadav JS. Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Circulation 2000; 101: 570–580.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schultz RD, Heuser RR, Hatler C, et al. Use of c7E3 Fab in conjunction with primary coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarctions complicated by cardiogenic shock. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996; 39: 143–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Giri S, Mitchel JF, Hirst JA, et al. Synergy between intracoronary stenting and abciximab in improving angiographic and clinical outcomes of primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 269–274.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hasdai D, Kitt MM, Harrington RA, et al. Impact of platelet glycoprotein íIb/IIIa blockade on outcome of cardiogenic shock among patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation [abstract]. Circulation 1999; 100 (Suppl I): I - 433.

    Google Scholar 

  41. LeDoux D, Astiz ME, Carpati CM, et al. Effects of perfusion pressure on tissue perfusion in septic shock. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 2792–2732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Denton MD, Chertow GM, Brady HR. “Renal-dose” dopamine for the treatment of acute renal failure: scientific rationale, experimental studies and clinical trials. Kidney Int 1996; 50: 4–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Clinical Trials Group. Low-dose dopamine in patients with early renal dysfunction: a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 2139–2143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Juste RN, Moran L, Hooper J, et al. Dopamine clearance in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1998; 24: 1217–1220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Colucci WS, Denniss AR, Leatherman GF, et al. Intracoronary infusion of dobutamine to patients with and without severe congestive heart failure: dose-response relationships, correlation with circulating catecholamines, and effect of phosphodiesterase inhibition. J Clin Invest 1988; 81: 1103–1110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lowes BD, Simon MA, Tsvetkova TO, et al. Inotropes in the beta-blocker era. Clin Cardiol 2000;23(Suppl III):III-11-III-16.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Grose R, Strain J, Greenberg M, et al. Systemic and coronary effects of intravenous milrinone and dobutamine in congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7: 1107–1113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Menon V, Slater JN, White HD, et al. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by systemic hypoperfusion without hypotension: report of the SHOCK Trial Registry. Am J Med 2000; 108: 374–380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hollenburg SM, Broussard M, Osman J, et al. Microvascular reactivity, blood pressure, and survival are improved in septic iNOS-deficient knockout mice [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35 (Suppl A): 312A.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Greenberg SS, Ouyang J, Zhao X. Inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA and protein in ventricular myocyte mitochondria in endotoxic shock [abstract]. Circulation 1998; 98 (Suppl I): I - 132.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Cotter G, Kaluski E, Blatt A, et al. L-NMMA (a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor) is effective in the treatment of cardiogenic shock [abstract]. Circulation 1999; 100 (Suppl I): I - 371.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cotter G, Kaluski E, Milovanov O, et al. LINCS: L-NMMA in cardiogenic shock: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study. Presented at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2001; Anaheim, California, USA; November 11–14, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Marzilli M, Orsini E, Marracini P, et al. Beneficial effects of intracoronary adenosine as an adjunct to primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000; 101: 2154–2159.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Mahaffey KW, Puma JA, Barbagelata A, et al. Adenosine as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: the Acute Myocardial Infarction Study of Adenosine (AMISTAD) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 1711–1720.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Scholz W, Albus U. Na+/H+ exchange and its inhibition in cardiac ischemia and reperfusion. Basic Res Cardiol 1993; 88: 443–455.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Scholz W, Albus U. Potential of selective sodium-hydrogen exchange inhibitors in cardiovascular therapy. Cardiovasc Res 1995; 29: 184–188.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Rupprecht H-J, vom Dahl J, Terres W, et al. Cardioprotective effects of the Na+/H+ exchange inhibitor cariporide in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction undergoing direct PTCA. Circulation 2000; 101: 2902–2908.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Théroux P, Chaitman BR, Danchin N, et al. Inhibition of the sodium—hydrogen exchanger with cariporide to prevent myocardial infarction in high-risk ischemic situations: main results of the GUARDIAN Trial. Circulation 2000; 102: 3032–3038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Zeymer U. The ESCAMI Study. Presented at the Hot Line I session, European Society of Cardiology XXIII Congress; Stockholm, Sweden; September 2, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Flaherty JT, Pitt B, Gruber JW, et al. Recombinant human superoxide dismutase (h-SOD) fails to improve recovery of ventricular function in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1994; 89: 1982–1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang Y, Patel AA, Juergens C, et al. N-Acetylcysteine improves myocardial salvage after reperfusion therapy in humans [abstract]. Circulation 1999; 100 (Suppl I): I - 371.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Oliver MF, Opie LH. Effects of glucose and fatty acids on myocardial ischemia and arrhythmias. Lancet 1994; 343: 155–158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Eberli FR, Weinberg EO, Grice WN, et al. Protective effects of increased glycolytic substrate against systolic and diastolic dysfunction and increased coronary resistance from prolonged global underperfusion and reperfusion in isolated rabbit hearts perfused with erythrocytes suspensions. Circ Res 1991; 68: 466–481.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Apstein CS, Taegtmeyer H. Glucose-insulin-potassium in acute myocardial infarction: the time has come for a large, prospective trial [editorial]. Circulation 1997; 96: 1074–1077.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Díaz R, Paolasso EA, Piegas LS, et al. Metabolic modulation of acute myocardial infarction: the ECLA Glucose—Insulin—Potassium Pilot Trial. Circulation 1998; 98: 2227–2234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

French, J.K., Wong, CK., White, H.D. (2002). Medical Treatment for Cardiogenic Shock. In: Hasdai, D., Berger, P.B., Battler, A., Holmes, D.R. (eds) Cardiogenic Shock. Contemporary Cardiology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-154-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-154-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-312-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-154-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics