Effects of Lung Volume Reduction Surgery on Survival in Patients with Advanced Emphysema



As detailed in Chapter 13, early reports have suggested that in many patients, lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) could provide significant improvements in respiratory function and dyspnea with low perioperative morbidity and mortality (1-7). More recent data from centers reporting their medium-term experiences confirm the functional and subjective benefits of LVRS in selected patient populations (8-11). Some investigators, however, have raised questions about the durability of these benefits, which appear to be short-lived in many patients (12,13). Only the analysis of longer-term data will clarify whether improvements in pulmonary function after LVRS will be long-lived or gradually be lost as the underlying disease process pursues its natural course.


Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Respir Crit Total Lung Capacity Actuarial Survival Lung Volume Reduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cooper JD, Trulock EP, Triantafillou AN, et al. (1995) Bilateral pneumectomy (volume reduction) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 109: 106–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooper JD, Patterson GA, Sundaresan RS, et al. (1996) Results of 150 consecutive bilateral lung volume reduction procedures in patients with severe emphysema (see comments). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:1319–1329; discussion 1329, 1330.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Argenziano M, Moazami N, Thomashow B, et al. (1996) Extended indications for lung volume reduction surgery in advanced emphysema. Ann Thorac Surg 62: 251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yusen RD, Trulock EP, Pohl MS, Biggar DG (1996) Results of lung volume reduction surgery in patients with emphysema. Semin Thor Cardiovasc Surg 8: 99–109.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daniel TM, Chan BB, Bhaskar V, et al. (1996) Lung volume reduction surgery: case selection, operative technique, and clinical results. Ann Surg 223:526–531; discussion 532, 533.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sciurba FC, Rogers RM, Keenen RJ, et al. (1996) Improvement in pulmonary function and elastic recoil after lung reduction surgery for diffuse emphysema (see comments). N Engl J Med 334: 1095–1099.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gelb AF, Brenner M, McKenna RJ, et al. (1996) Lung function 12 months following emphysema resection. Chest 100: 1407–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brenner M, McKenna R, Gelb A, et al. (1997)Objective predictors of response for staple versus laser emphysematous lung reduction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155: 1295–1301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Argenziano M, Thomashow B, Jellen PA, et al. (1997) Functional comparison of unilateral versus bilateral lung volume reduction surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 64:321–326; discussion 326, 327.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keller CA, Ruppel G, Hibbett A, et al. (1997) Thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery reduces dyspnea and improved exercise capacity in patients with emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156: 60–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martinez FJ, de Oca MM, Whyte RI, et al. (1997) Lung volume reduction improved dyspnea, dynamic hyperinflation, and respiratory muscle function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155: 1984–1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brenner M, McKenna RJ, Gelb AF, et al. (1998) Rate of FEV 1 change following lung volume reduction surgery. Chest 113: 652–660.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kesten S, Elpern E, Warren W, Szidon P. (1999) Loss of pulmonary function gains after lung volume reduction surgery. J Heart Lung Transplant 18: 266–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Argenziano M, Thomashow B, Jellen PA, Gorenstein LA, Rose EA, Steinglass KM, Weinberg AD, Ginsburg ME. Effects of lung volume reduction surgery on survival in patients with end-stage emphysema. Ann Thorac Surg 2001,in press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sweer L, Zwillich CW (1990) Dyspnea in the patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med 11: 417–445.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meyers BF, Yusen RD, Lefrak SS, et al. (1998) Outcome of medicare patients with emphysema selected for, but denied, a lung volume reduction operation. Ann Thorac Surg 66: 331–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anthonisen N, Wright E, Hodgkin J, et al. (1986) Prognosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 133: 14–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morell NW, Wignall BK, Biggs T, Seed WA (1994) Collateral circulation and gas exchange in emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 150: 635–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mead J, Turner J, Macklem P, et al. (1966) Significance of the relationship between lung recoil and maximum expiratory flow. JAppl Physiol 22: 95–108.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial Group (1980) Continuous or nocturnal oxygen therapy in hypoxemic chronic obstructive lung disease: a clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 93: 391–398.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Intermittent Positive Pressure Breathing Trial Group (1983) Intermittent positive pressure breathing therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Intern Med 99: 612–620.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations