Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Forensic Science and Medicine ((FSM))

Abstract

All doctors, not just those engaged in forensic practice, should be able to describe and record injuries accurately. In most circumstances, except when the victim is dead, the doctor’ s first responsibility is usually the treatment of the injury, an obvious priority that may overshadow the necessity to make detailed contemporaneous notes of the findings. Also, as this initial examination has not been carried out for medicolegal purposes, the forensic significance of the injuries may not become apparent until many weeks or months later. Scrutiny of the doctor’ s notes at a later stage, possibly in court, may reveal serious deficiencies, which not only bring discredit on the individual practitioner and the profession as a whole but could seriously prejudice the legal proceedings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Knight, B. (1996) The pathology of wounds, in Forensic Pathology ( Knight, B., ed.), Arnold, London, pp. 133–169

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crane, J. (1996) Injury, in Clinical Forensic Medicine (McLay, W. D. S., ed.), Greenwich Medical Media, London, pp. 143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Langlois, N. E. I. and Gresham, G. A. (1991) The ageing of bruises: a review and study of the colour changes with time. Forensic Sci Int. 50, 227–238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stephenson, T. and Bialas, Y. (1996) Estimation of the age of bruising. Arch Dis Child. 74, 53–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Maio, V. J. M. (1985) Gunshot Wounds. Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. British Medical Association-Report of a Working Party (1992) Medicine Betrayed. British Medical Association, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crane, J. (2000). Injury Interpretation. In: Stark, M.M. (eds) A Physician’s Guide to Clinical Forensic Medicine. Forensic Science and Medicine. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-022-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-022-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9619-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-022-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics