Skip to main content

Toxicology and Regulatory Aspects of Platinum Drugs

  • Chapter
  • 297 Accesses

Part of the book series: Cancer Drug Discovery and Development ((CDD&D))

Abstract

The goals of preclinical toxicology studies for oncology drugs are (1) to identify a starting dose that is both safe and that minimizes the number of patients treated with ineffective doses, (2) to identify important potential clinical toxicities, and (3) to assist in the design of human dosing regimens and escalation schemes (1). Toward these goals, studies are performed in animals to estimate the human maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and characterize drug-induced toxicities. Studies in both rodents and non-rodents to support Phase I trials have been expected by the U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA) since 1982 (2,3). In contrast, since 1981 clinical trials conducted under the auspices of the Cancer Research Campaign and the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer have relied on preclinical testing in rodents only for oncology drugs (4). The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products has recently formalized this rodent-only approach as only acceptable for entry of cytotoxic oncology drugs with known mechansims of action into Phase I trials. For drugs with novel mechanisms of action, studies in rodents and non-rodents are currently expected (5).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DeGeorge, J. J., Ahn, C. -H., Andrews, P. A., Brower, M. E., Giorgio, D. W., Goheer, M. A., et al. (1998) Regulatory considerations for preclinical development of anticancer drugs. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 41, 173–185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grieshaber, C. K. and Marsoni, S. (1986) Relation of preclinical toxicology to findings in early clinical trials. Cancer Treat. Rep. 70, 65–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lowe, M. C. and Davis, R. D. (1984) The current toxicology protocol of the National Cancer Institute, in Fundamentals of Cancer Chemotherapy ( Helmann, K. and Carter, S. K. eds.), McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 228–235.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burtles, S. S., Newell, D. R., Henrar, R., and Connors, T. A. (1995) Revisions of general guidelines for the preclinical toxicology of new cytotoxic anticancer agents in Europe. Eur. J. Cancer 31A, 408–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (1998) Note for guidance on the pre-clinical evaulation of anticancer medicinal products. CPMP/SWP/997/96, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Connors, T. A. and Pinedo, H. M. (1997) Drug development in Europe, in Anticancer Drug Development Guide: Preclinical Screening, Clinical Trials and Approval ( Teicher, B. A.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ed.), Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp. 271–288.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burtles, S. S., Jodrell, D. I., and Newell, D. R. (1998) Evaluation of “rodent-only” preclinical toxicology for Phase I trials of new cancer treatments—the Cancer Research Campaign (CRC) experience. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 39, 363.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koeller, J. M., Trump, D. L., Tutsch, K. D., Earhart, R. H., Davis, T. E., and Tormey, D. C. (1986) Phase I clinical trial and pharmacokinetics of carboplatin (NSC 241240) by single monthly 30-minute infusion. Cancer 57, 222–225.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Theriault, R. L., Cohen, I. A., Esparza, L., Kowal, C., and Raber, M. N. (1993) Phase I clinical evaluation of [SP-4–3(R)]-[1,1-cyclo-butanedicarboxylato(2-)](2-methyl-1,4-butanediamine-N,N) platinum in patients with metastic solid tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 31, 333–337.

    Google Scholar 

  11. DeConti, R. C., Toftness, B. R., Lange, R. C., and Creasey, W. A. (1973) Clinical and pharmacological studies with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II). Cancer Res. 33 1310–1315.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ceulemans, F., Trouet, A., Duprez, P., Vindevogel, A., Alaerts, P., Hammershaimb, L., et al. (1989) Phase I study of a new water soluble platinum containing antitumor agent CL 287,110 (CL) in advanced cancer patients (pts.). Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 30, 283.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Creaven, P. J., Madajewicz, S., Pendyala, L., Mittelman, A., Pontes, E., Spaulding, M., et al. (1983) Phase I clinical trial of cis-dichloro-trans-dihydroxy-bis-isopropylamine platinum (IV) (CHIP). Cancer Treat. Rep. 67, 795–800.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McKeage, M. J., Mistry, P., Ward, J., Boxall, F. E., Loh, S., O’Neill, C., et al. (1995) A phase I and pharmacology study of an oral platinum complex, JM216: dose-dependent pharmacokinetics with single-dose administration. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 36, 451–458.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Perez-Soler, R. Lopez-Berestein, G., Lautersztain, J., Al-Baker, S., Francis, K., MaciasKiger, D., et al. (1990) Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of liposome-entrapped cis-bis-neodecanoato-trans-R,R-1,2-diaminocyclohexane platinum (II). Cancer Res. 50 4254–4259.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fiebig, H. H., Moss, K., Henss, H., Ludolph, D., Meyberg, F., Aulenbacher, P., et al. (1994) Phase I clinical trial of lobaplatin (D-19466) after intravenous bolus injection. Onkologie 17, 142–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Extra, J. M., Espie, M., Calvo, F., Ferme, C., Mignot, L., and Marty, M. (1990) Phase I study

    Google Scholar 

  18. of oxaliplatin in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 25 299–303.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tanis, B. C., Vermorken, J. B., Ten Bokkel Huinink, W. W., Klein, I., Gall, H. E., van Oosterom, A. T., et al. (1991) Phase I study of spiroplatin. Eur. J. Cancer 27, 268–273.

    Google Scholar 

  20. O’Rourke, T. J., Weiss, G. R., New, P., Burris, H. A., Rodriguez, G., Eckhardt, J., et al. (1994) Phase I clinical trial of ormaplatin (tetraplatin, NSC 363812). Anti-Cancer Drugs 5, 520–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dodion, P. F., de Valeriola, D., Crespeigne, N., Kantrowitz, J. D., Piccart, M., Wery, F., et al. (1991) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of zeniplatin, a new platinum complex. Ann. Oncol. 2, 589–596.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Clark, D. L., Andrews, P. A., DeGeorge, J. J., Justice, R. L., and Beitz, J. G. (1998) Extrapolating starting doses using mg/kg° 77 instead of mg/m2 would have allowed more efficient Phase I trials for platinum anticancer drugs. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 39, 363.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Freireich, E. J., Gehan, E. A., Rall, D. P., Schmidt, L. H., and Skipper, H. E. (1966) Quantitative comparison of toxicity of anticancer agents in mouse, rat, hamster, dog, monkey and man. Cancer Chemother. Rep. 50, 219–244.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Simon, R., Freidlin, B., Rubinstein, L., Arbuck, S. G., Collins, J., and Christian, M. C. (1997) Accelerated titration designs for Phase I clinical trials in oncology. J. Nat1 Cancer Inst. 89, 1138–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Farfies, D. (1994) Practical modifications of the continual reassessment method for phase I cancer clinical trials. J. Biopharm. Stat. 4, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Collins, J., Zaharko, D. S., Dedrick, R. L., and Chabner, B. A. (1986) Potential roles for pre-clinical pharmacology in phase I clinical trials. Cancer Treat. Rep. 70, 73–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Eortc Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism Group (1987) Pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation in phase I clinical trials. Commentary and proposed guidelines. Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 23, 1083–1087.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mani, S. and Ratain, M. (1997) New phase I trial methodology. Semin. Oncol. 24, 253–261.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Verweij, J. (1996) Starting dose levels for phase I studies. Ann. Oncol. 7, 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Collins, J., Grieshaber, C. K., and Chabner, B. A. (1990) Pharmacologically guided phase I clincial trials based upon preclinical drug development. J. Nall Cancer Inst. 82, 1321–1326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clark, D.L., Andrews, P.A., Smith, D.D., DeGeorge, J.J., Justice, R.L., Beitz, J.G. (2000). Toxicology and Regulatory Aspects of Platinum Drugs. In: Kelland, L.R., Farrell, N.P. (eds) Platinum-Based Drugs in Cancer Therapy. Cancer Drug Discovery and Development. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-012-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-012-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-091-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-012-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics