Analysing Phylogenetic Structures



This chapter shows how multivariate approaches can be used for investigating phylogenetic structures, focussing on methods for measuring, testing, accounting for and describing a phylogenetic signal.


  1. Abouheif E (1999) A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data. Evol Ecol Res 1:895–909Google Scholar
  2. Ackerly DD, Donoghue MJ (1998) Leaf size, sapling allometry, and corner’s rules: phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples (acer). Am Nat 152(6):767–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57(4):717–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheverud JM, Dow MM (1985) An autocorrelation analysis of genetic variation due to lineal fission in social groups of Rhesus macaques. Am J Phys Anthropol 67:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheverud JM, Dow MM, Leutenegger W (1985) The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constaints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weights among primates. Evolution 39:1335–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dray S, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR (2006) Spatial modeling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbor matrices (PCNM). Ecol Model 196:483–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gittleman JL, Kot M (1990) Adaptation: statistics and a null model for estimating phylogenetic effects. Syst Zool 39:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Griffith DA (1996) Spatial autocorrelation and eigenfunctions of the geographic weights matrix accompanying geo-referenced data. Can Geogr 40(4):351–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harvey PH, Pagel M (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Jombart T, Balloux F, Dray S (2010a) adephylo: new tools for investigating the phylogenetic signal in biological traits. Bioinformatics 26:1907–1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jombart T, Pavoine S, Dufour AB, Pontier D (2010b) Putting phylogeny into the analysis of biological traits: a methodological approach. J Theor Biol 264:693–701MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martins EP, Diniz-Filho JAF, Housworth EA (2002) Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative method: a computer simulation test. Evolution 56(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ollier S, Couteron P, Chessel D (2005) Orthonormal transform to detect and characterize phylogenetic signal. Biometrics 62:471–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pavoine S, Ollier S, Pontier D, Chessel D (2008) Testing for phylogenetic signal in life history variable: Abouheif’s test revisited. Theor Popul Biol 73:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pélabon C, Gaillard JM, Loison A, Portier C (1995) Is sex-biased maternal care limited by total maternal expenditure in polygynous ungulates? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37(5):311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. R Hackathon et al (2017) phylobase: base package for phylogenetic structures and comparative data., R package version 0.8.4
  19. Revell LJ, Collar DC (2009) Phylogenetic analysis of the evolutionary correlation using likelihood. Evolution 63(4):1090–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schliep KP (2011) phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27(4):592–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schliep, Klaus, Potts, J A, Morrison, A D, Grimm, W G (2017) Intertwining phylogenetic trees and networks. Meth Ecol Evol 8(10):1212–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie EvolutiveCNRS UMR 5558 – Université de LyonVilleurbanneFrance
  2. 2.Department of Infectious Disease EpidemiologyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
  3. 3.Centre d’Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO)Muséum national déHistoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne UniversitéParisFrance

Personalised recommendations