Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neuropsychological Interventions for Individuals with Brain Injury

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Physician's Field Guide to Neuropsychology

  • 966 Accesses

Abstract

Physicians may be asked to provide opinions on forensic issues affecting their patients which complicate the doctor-patient relationship. Physicians and neuropsychologists can work well together to address legal matters that arise during routine patient care or from attorney referrals once a matter becomes a legal dispute in civil or criminal court. Medical information from the physician and neuropsychological test data accurately interpreted by the neuropsychologist, along with a clear understanding of the legal issue being contested, can help the courts accurately interpret medical and neurobehavioral science accurately. This chapter will provide a brief overview of the various civil and criminal legal proceedings that patients may face and how these legal matters can be addressed with collaboration between physicians and neuropsychologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jorge RE, Starkstein SE. Pathophysiologic aspects of major depression following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005;20(6):475–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Heart Association. Stroke statistics. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldstein LB, Adams R, Becker K, Furberg CD, Gorelick PB, Hademenos G, Hill M, Howard G, Howard VJ, Jacobs B, Levine SR, Mosca L, Sacco RL, Sherman DG, Wolf PA, del Zoppo GJ. Primary prevention of ischemic stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the stroke council of the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2001;32(1):280–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rotundi AJ, Sinkule J, Spring M. An interactive web-based intervention for persons with TBI and their families. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005;20(2):173–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks DM, McKinlay W. Personality and behavioral change after severe blunt head injury—a relative’s view. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983;46:336–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Seel RT, Kreutzer JS, Rosenthal M, Hammond FM, Corrigan JD, Black K. Depression after traumatic brain injury: a national institute on disability and rehabilitation research model systems multicenter investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:177–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deb S, Lyons I, Koutzoukis C, Ali I, McCarthy G. Rate of psychiatric illness 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Am J Psychiatr. 1999;156:374–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guth PE. The effects of depression in head injured adults as related to educational level, gender, and activity level. In: Dissertation abstracts international: section B: the sciences & engineering, vol. 61. US: University Microfilms International; 2000. p. 1803.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kreutzer JS, Seel RT, Gourley E. The prevalence and symptom rates of depression after traumatic brain injury: a comprehensive examination. Brain Inj. 2005;15(7):563–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lezak M. Relationship between personality disorders, social disturbances, and physical disability following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1987;2(1):57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Varney NR, Martzke JS, Roberts RJ. Major depression in patients with closed head injury. Neuropsychology. 1987;1(1):7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dickmen SS, Bombardier CH, Machamer JE, Fann JR, Temkin NR. Natural history of depression in traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(9):1457–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan-Bourne J, Brown RG. Cognitive behaviour therapy for the treatment of depression in individuals with brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2003;13(1/2):89–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sandin KJ, Cifu DX, Noll SF. Stroke rehabilitation: IV. Psychological and social implications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:52–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wallace CA. Unawareness of deficits: emotional implications for patients and significant others. In: Dissertation abstracts international: section B: the sciences & engineering, vol. 60. US: University Microfilms International; 2000. p. 4257.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cicerone KD, Mott T, Azulay JA, Friel J. Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:943–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dickmen SS, Ross BL, Machamer JE, Temkin NR. One year psychosocial outcome in head injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995;1:67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. National Institutes of Health Consensus Developmental Panel on Rehabilitation of Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury. Rehabilitation of personal with traumatic brain injury. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282:974–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. US National Institutes of Health. Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. NIH Consensus Statement. October 26-28th; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klonoff PS, Lamb DG, Henderson SW. Outcomes from milieu-based neurorehabilitation at up to 11 years post-discharge. Brain Inj. 2001;15(5):413–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ponsford JL, Sloan SS, Snow P. Traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Corrigan JD, Hammond FM. Traumatic brain injury as a chronic health condition. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1199–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hammond FM, Malec JF. Rethinking brain injury. Brain injury professional; 2013. p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sarajuuri JM, Kaipio J-L, Koskinen SK, Niemela MR, Servo AR, Vilkki JS. Outcome of a comprehensive neurorehabilitation program for patients with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:2296–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Trexler LE, Trexler LC, Malec JF, Klyce D, Parrot D. Prospective randomized controlled trial of resource facilitation on community participation and vocational outcome following brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;26(6):440–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson B. Recovery and compensatory strategies in head injured memory impaired people several years after insult. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:177–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bergquist TF, Malec JF. Neuropsychological assessment for treatment planning and research. In: Eslinger PJ, editor. Neuropsychological interventions: clinical research and practice. New York: The Guilford Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ben-Yishay Y, Diller L. Handbook of holistic neuropsychological rehabilitation: outpatient rehabilitation of traumatic brain injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Trexler LE. Rehabilitation continuum in persons with brain injury; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zasler ND, Katz DI, Zafonte RD. Brain injury medicine. 2nd ed. New York: Demos; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Malec JF. Post-hospital rehabilitation. In: Zasler ND, Katz DI, Zafonte RD, editors. Brain injury medicine. 2nd ed. New York: Demos; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ben-Yishay Y, Rattok J, Lakin P, et al. Neuropsychologic rehabilitation: quest for a holistic approach. Semin Neurol. 1985;5:252–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Prigatano GP, Fordyce DJ, Zeiner HK, Roueche JR, Pepping M, Wood BC. Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Christensen AL, Pinner EM, Moller PP, Teasdale TW, Trexler LE. Psychosocial outcome following individualized neuropsychological rehabilitation of brain damage. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992;85:32–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Malec JF. Impact of comprehensive day treatment on societal participation for persons with acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:885–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Malec JF, Moessner AM, Kragness M, Lezak MD. Refining a measure of brain injury sequelae to predict post-acute rehabilitation outcome; rating scale analysis of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000;15:670–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Introduction to cognitive rehabilitation. New York: The Guildford Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mazmanian PE, Kreutzer JS, Devany CW, Martin KO. A survey of accredited and other rehabilitation facilities: education, training and cognitive rehabilitation in brain-injury programmes. Brain Inj. 1993;7:319–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shallice T. Cognitive neuropsychology and rehabilitation: is pessimism justified? Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2000;10(3):209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Cognitive rehabilitation: an integrative neuropsychological approach. New York: The Guildford Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Harley JP, Allen C, Braciszeski TL, Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Evans S. Guidelines for cognitive rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation. 1992;2:62–7.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cappa SF, Benke T, Blarke S, Rossi B, Stemmer B, van Heugten C. EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS taskforce. Eur J Neurol. 2005;12:665–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg MA, Kalmar K, Langenbahn DM, Malec JF, Bergquist T, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:1596–615.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg MA, Malec JF, Langenbahn DM, Felicetti T, Kneippe S, Ellmo W, Kalmar K, Giacino JT, Harley JP, Laatsch L, Morse PA, Catanese J. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 to 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1681–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M, Felicetti T, Laatsch L, Harley JP, Berquist T, Azulay J, Cantor J, Ashman T. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 to 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;9:519–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Haskins EC, Cicerone K, Dams-O’Connor K, Eberle R, Langenbahn D, Shapiro-Rosenbaum A, Trexler LE. Cognitive rehabilitation manual: translating evidence-based recommendations into practice. 1st ed. Reston: ACRM Publishing; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hawley L, Newman J. Social skills and traumatic brain injury: a workbook for group treatment; Authors; 2006. www.brainjurysocialcompetence.com.

  48. Hawley L, Newman J. Group Interactive Structured Treatment—GIST: For Social Competence. Denver, CO 2006; updated 2008 (originally titled Social Skills and Traumatic Brain Injury: A Workbook for Group Treatment; and Social Problem-solving Group, 2003). www.brainjurysocialcompetence.com.

  49. Morton MV, Wehman P. Psychosocial and emotional sequelae of individuals with traumatic brain injury: a literature review and recommendations. Brain Inj. 1995;9:81–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Butler RW, Satz D. Individual psychotherapy with head injured adults: clinical note for the practitioner. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 1988;19(5):536–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Brotherton FA, Thomas LL, Wisotzek IE, Milan MA. Social skills training in the rehabilitation in patients with traumatic closed head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:827–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Schlund MW, Pace G. Relationship between traumatic brain injury and the environment: feedback reduces maladaptive behavior by three persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 1999;13:889–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lewinsohn PM. A behavioral approach to depression. In: Friedman RJ, Katz MM, editors. The psychology of depression: contemporary theory of research. Washington DC: Winston; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bellus SB, Kost PP, Vergo JG, Dinezza GJ. Improvements in cognitive functioning following intensive behavioral rehabilitation. Brain Inj. 1998;12:139–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Drummond A, Walker M. Generalisation of the effects of leisure rehabilitation for stroke patients. Br J Occup Ther. 1996;59:330–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. al-Adawi S, Powell JH, Greenwood RJ. Motivational deficits after brain injury: a neuropsychological approach using new assessment techniques. Neuropsychology. 1998;12:115–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wood RL, McMillan T. Neurobehavioural disabilities and social handicap following traumatic brain injury. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Beck AT. Cognitive therapy: nature and relation to behavior therapy. Behav Ther. 1970;1:184–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Larcombe NA, Wilson PH. An evaluation of cognitive behavior therapy for depression in patients with multiple sclerosis. Br J Psychiatry. 1984;145:366–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lincoln NB, Flannaghan T, Surcliff L, Rother L. Evaluation of cognitive behavioural treatment for depression after stroke: a pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 1997;11:114–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Montgomery GK. A multi-factor account of disability after brain injury: implications for neuropsychological counseling. Brain Inj. 1995;9:453–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mohr DC, Boudewyn AC, Goodkin DE, Bostrom A, Epsteain L. Comparative outcomes for individual cognitive-behavioral therapy, supportive-expressive group psychotherapy, and sertraline for the treatment of depression in multiple sclerosis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69:942–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Anson K, Ponsford J. Evaluation of a coping skills group following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2006;20:167–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Backhaus SL, Ibarra SL, Klyce D, Trexler LE, Malec JF. Brain injury coping skills group: a preventative intervention for patients with brain injury and the caregivers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:840–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Backhaus SL, Ibarra SL, Parrot D, Malec JF. Comparison of cognitive-behavioral treatment versus peer support in individuals with brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(2):281–91.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ming-Yun H, Ponsford J, Wong D, Schonberger M, Taffe J, Mckay A. Motivational interviewing and cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety following traumatic brain injury: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012;22(4):585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Fann JR, Hart T, Schomer KG. Treatment for depression after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(12):2383–402. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2009.1091.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Harris JKJ, Godfrey HPD, Partridge FM, Knight RG. Caregiver depression following traumatic brain injury (TBI): a consequence of adverse effects on family members? Brain Inj. 2001;15:223–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Sander A. Introduction to the special issue: brain injury and the family. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007a;22:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Carnes SL, Quinn WH. Family adaptation to brain injury: coping and psychological distress. Fam Syst Health. 2005;23:186–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Reinhard SC, Horwitz AV. Caregiver burden: differentiating the content and consequences of family caregiving. J Marriage Fam. 1995;57:741–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Schonberger M, Ponsford J, Olver J, Ponsford M. A longitudinal study of family functioning after TBI and relatives’ emotional status. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010;20:813–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Anderson MI, Parmenter TR, Mok M. The relationship between neurobehavioral problems of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), family functioning and the psychological well-being of the spouse/caregiver: path model analysis. Brain Inj. 2002;16:743–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Rivera P, Elliott TR, Berry JW, Grant JS, Oswald K. Predictors of caregiver depression among community-residing families living with traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22:3–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Lehan T, Arango-Lasprilla JC, de los Reyes CJ, Quijano MC. The ties that bind: the relationship between caregiver burden and the neuropsychological functioning of TBI survivors. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;30:87–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Sander A, Caroselli JS, High WM, Becker C, Neese L, Scheibel R. Relationship of family functioning to progress in a post-acute rehabilitation programme following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2002;16:649–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Kreutzer JS, Rapport LJ, Marwitz JH, Harrison-Felix C, Hart T, Glenn M, Hammond F. Caregivers’ well-being after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter prospective investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009a;90:934–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Kreutzer JS, Stejskal TM, Ketchum JM, Marwitz JH, Taylor LA, Menzel JC. A preliminary investigation of the brain injury family intervention: impact on family members. Brain Inj. 2009b;23:535–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Kreutzer JS, Gervaio AH, Camplair PS. Primary caregivers’ psychological status and family functioning after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 1994a;8:197–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Ramkumar NA, Elliott TR. Family caregiving of persons following neurotrauma: issues in research, service and policy. NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;27:105–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Gan C, Gargaro J, Brandys C, Gerber G, Boschen K. Family caregivers’ support needs after brain injury: a synthesis of perspectives from caregivers, programs, and researchers. NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;27:5–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Hanks RA, Rapport LJ, Vangel S. Caregiving appraisal after traumatic brain injury: the effects of functional status, coping style, social support and family functioning. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22:43–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Norup A, Kristensen KS, Siert L, Poulsen I, Mortensen L. Neuropsychological support to relatives of patients with severe traumatic brain injury in the sub-acute phase. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011;21:306–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Boschen K, Gargaro J, Gan C, Gerber G, Brandys C. Family interventions after acquired brain injury and other chronic conditions: a critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22:19–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Sander AM. A cognitive-behavioral intervention for family member of personals with TBI. In: Zafonte RD, Katz DI, Zasler ND, editors. Brain injury medicine: principles and practice. New York: Demos; 2007b.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Perlesz A, Kinsella G, Crowe S. Impact of traumatic brain injury on the family: a critical review. Rehabil Psychol. 1999;44:6–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Samantha L. Backhaus

  2. Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Summer L. Ibarra

Authors
  1. Samantha L. Backhaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Summer L. Ibarra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Summer L. Ibarra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA

    Karen M. Sanders

Chapter Review Questions

Chapter Review Questions

  1. 1.

    Following a brain injury, the risk for developing depression is elevated:

    1. A.

      Only in the first 3 months after the injury.

    2. B.

      Only if the person is not married.

    3. C.

      At any time after the brain injury.

    4. D.

      Never. People with brain injury are not at risk for depression. Only their caregivers are.

  2. 2.

    According to Trexler [25], which of the following statements are true?

    1. A.

      An individual’s personality traits and style of coping can influence how they recover from an injury.

    2. B.

      The most important variable that predicts recovery after brain injury is the actual medically defined severity of the injury, with the single largest factor being the Glasgow Coma Scale at the time of the accident.

    3. C.

      Having an emotional reaction to the brain injury, such as grief, is an unhealthy response that can lead to detrimental consequences to rehabilitation outcome.

    4. D.

      A and C.

    5. E.

      B and C.

    6. F.

      None of the above.

  3. 3.

    Which of the following statements are not true about cognitive behavioral therapy?

    1. A.

      This therapy is often used to help individual identify when they are perceiving or thinking about a situation or themselves in an unhealthy way and then teach the individual how to cope and adjust to their current circumstances.

    2. B.

      This is a treatment that includes use of electrodes to measure brain activity while the individual completes a cognitive task.

    3. C.

      Research studies have demonstrated efficacy of using this treatment in individuals with brain injury.

    4. D.

      This therapy can be used with individuals with brain injury but hopefully with accommodations or modifications to compensate for cognitive deficits.

  4. 4.

    Review of the evidence-based studies completed on family and caregiver interventions following a brain injury has found that:

    1. A.

      There are a plethora of studies and at this point, the field of investigating the efficacy of caregiver interventions is saturated. No more studies are needed.

    2. B.

      Neuropsychological interventions for treatment of brain injury should only be focused on the person that actually experienced the injury.

    3. C.

      Of the few interventions that have been developed and studied, results show that families and caregivers can benefit from receiving skilled interventions to help them better understand the effects of the injury and learn coping strategies.

    4. D.

      None of the above.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Backhaus, S.L., Ibarra, S.L. (2019). Neuropsychological Interventions for Individuals with Brain Injury. In: Sanders, K. (eds) Physician's Field Guide to Neuropsychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8722-1_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8722-1_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8720-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8722-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation