Advertisement

Plant Succession on the Mount St. Helens Debris-Avalanche Deposit and the Role of Non-native Species

  • Virginia H. Dale
  • Elsie M. Denton
Chapter

Abstract

The debris-avalanche deposit is one of the most severely disturbed areas created by the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, with little survival of a few plant fragments, and primary succession mostly being initiated by the seeds dispersed onto the newly emplaced material. Vegetation changes on the debris-avalanche deposit during the first 30 years post eruption are analyzed, considering the role of non-native species and potential future vegetation patterns on the deposit. We found that the aerial distribution of largely non-native seeds on a subset of plots at Mount St. Helens in 1980 has had a pronounced and enduring effect on subsequent vegetation communities.

Keywords

Avalanche Disturbance Erosion Mount St. Helens Native plants Non-native plants Seeds Succession Volcano Washington state 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Logistic support was provided by the USDA Forest Service, the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, and Weyerhaeuser Company. Over the 30 years of the study, fieldwork was conducted with the assistance of A.B. Adams, Wendy Adams, Charles Crisafulli, Ginny Dains, D. Donohue, Margaret Evans, Howard Haemmaerle, Brad Hensley, Charlie Hensley, Asa Holland, Robert Holland, Keith Kline, Jasmine Kuliashi, Ian Kulaishi, Bridgette Nyberg, Eric Smith, Mandy Tu, and John Wallace. Over the years of this study, the research was partially funded by the National Science Foundation, the National Geographic Society, Earthwatch, and The Center for Field Research of Belmont, Massachusetts. The University of Washington Herbarium was used to verify plant species identifications. Statisticians from Colorado State University helped with the analysis: Phil Turk advised on PERMANOVA and James R. zumBrunnen advised on the repeated measures analysis. Comments of Charles Crisafulli and two anonymous reviewers on an earlier draft were helpful. Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the US Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725.

References

  1. Adams, V.D., and A.B. Adams. 1982. Initial recovery of the vegetation on Mount St. Helens. In Mount St. Helens: One year later, ed. S.A.C. Keller, 105–113. Cheney: Eastern Washington University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, A.B., J.R. Wallace, J.T. Jones, and W.K. McElroy. 1986. Plant ecosystem resilience following the 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens, Washington. In Mount St. Helens: Five years later, ed. S.A.C. Keller, 182–207. Cheney: Eastern Washington University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, A.B., and V.H. Dale. 1987. Vegetative succession following glacial and volcanic disturbances in the Cascade Mountain Range of Washington, U.S.A. In Mount St. Helens 1980: Botanical consequences of the explosive eruption, ed. D.E. Bilderback, 70–147. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, M. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26: 32–46.Google Scholar
  5. Ares, A., S.D. Berryman, and K.J. Puettmann. 2009. Understory vegetation response to thinning disturbance of varying complexity in coniferous stands. Applied Vegetation Science 12: 472–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banks, N.G., and R.P. Hoblitt. 1981. Summary of temperature studies of 1980 deposits. In The 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens, Washington, Professional Paper 1250, ed. P.W. Lipman and D.R. Mullineaux, 295–314. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  7. Bråkenhielm, S., and L. Qinghong. 1995. Comparison of field methods in vegetation monitoring. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 79: 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bray, J.R., and J.T. Curtis. 1957. An ordination of upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarkson, B.D. 1990. A review of vegetation development following recent (<450 years) volcanic disturbance in North Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 14: 59–71.Google Scholar
  10. Cline, J.F., and V.A. Uresk. 1979. Revegetation of disturbed grounds in the semi-arid climate of southcentral Washington. Health Physics 36: 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dale, V.H. 1986. Plant recovery on the debris avalanche at Mount St. Helens. In Mount St. Helens: Five years later, ed. S.A.C. Keller, 208–214. Cheney: Eastern Washington University Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1989. Wind dispersed seeds and plant recovery on the Mount St. Helens debris avalanche. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 1434–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 1991. The debris avalanche at Mount St. Helens: Vegetation establishment in the ten years since the eruption. National Geographic Research and Exploration 7: 328–341.Google Scholar
  14. Dale, V.H., and W. Adams. 2003. Plant establishment fifteen years after the debris avalanche at Mount St. Helens, Washington. Science of the Total Environment 313: 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dale, V.H., A. Lugo, J. MacMahon, and S. Pickett. 1998. Ecosystem management in the context of large, infrequent disturbances. Ecosystems 1: 546–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dale, V.H., D.R. Campbell, W.M. Adams, C.M. Crisafulli, V. Dains, P.M. Frenzen, and R. Holland. 2005a. Plant succession on the Mount St. Helens debris-avalanche deposit. In Ecological responses to the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, ed. V.H. Dale, F.J. Swanson, and C.M. Crisafulli, 59–74. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dale, V.H., J. Delgado-Acevedo, and J. MacMahon. 2005b. Effects of modern volcanic eruptions on vegetation. In Volcanoes and the environment, ed. J. Marti and G.G.J. Ernst, 227–249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dale, V.H., F.J. Swanson, and C.M. Crisafulli. 2005c. Ecological perspectives on environmental management following the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens. In Ecological responses to the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, ed. V.H. Dale, F.J. Swanson, and C.M. Crisafulli, 277–286. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 2005d. Disturbance, survival, and succession: Context for understanding ecological responses to the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens. In Ecological responses to the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, ed. V.H. Dale, F.J. Swanson, and C.M. Crisafulli, 3–12. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunn, O.J. 1961. Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association 56 (293): 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Easterling, D.R., T.R. Karl, E.H. Mason, P.Y. Hughes, D.P. Bowman, R.C. Daniels, and T.A. Boden, eds. 1996. United States historical climatology network (U.S. HCN) monthly temperature and precipitation data, ORNL/CDIAC-87, NDP-019/R3. Oak Ridge: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  22. Fairchild, L.H. 1985. Lahars at Mount St. Helens, Washington. Master’s thesis. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  23. Franklin, J.F., and C.T. Dyrness. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington, General Technical Report PNW-8. Portland: Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. (Republished by Oregon State University Press in 1988).Google Scholar
  24. Glicken, H. 1998. Rockslide-debris avalanche of May 18, 1980, Mount St. Helens volcano, Washington. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Japan 49: 55–106.Google Scholar
  25. Gray, A.N., K. Barndt, and S.H. Reichard. 2011. Nonnative invasive plants of Pacific coast forests: A field guide for identification, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-817. Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griggs, R.F. 1918a. The recovery of vegetation at Kodiak. Ohio Journal of Science 19: 1–57.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 1918b. The great hot mudflow of the Valley of 10,000 Smokes. Ohio Journal of Science 19: 117–142.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 1918c. The Valley of Ten Thousand Smokes: An account of the discovery and exploration of the most wonderful volcanic region in the world. The National Geographic Magazine 33: 10–68.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 1919. The beginnings of revegetation in Katmai Valley. Ohio Journal of Science 19: 318–342.Google Scholar
  30. Grishin, S. Yu, R. del Moral, P. Krestov, and V.P. Verkholat. 1998. Succession following the catastrophic eruption of Ksudach volcano (Kamchatka, 1907). Vegetatio 127: 129–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halpern, C.B., and J.A. Lutz. 2013. Canopy closure exerts weak controls on understory dynamics: A 30-year study of overstory-understory interactions. Ecological Monographs 83: 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Halpern, C.B., and T.A. Spies. 1995. Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests in the Pacific Northwest. Ecological Applications 5: 913–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jennrich, R., and M. Schluchter. 1986. Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices. Biometrics 42: 805–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirby, K.J., D.R. Bazely, E.A. Goldberg, J.E. Hall, R. Isted, S.C. Perry, and R.C. Thomas. 2014. Changes in the tree and shrub layer of Wytham Woods (southern England) 1974–2012: Local and national trends compared. Forestry 87: 663–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kuebbing, S.E., and M.A. Nuñez. 2015. Negative, neutral, and positive interactions among nonnative plants: Patterns, processes, and management implications. Global Change Biology 21: 926–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuebbing, S.E., and D. Simberloff. 2015. Missing the bandwagon: Nonnative species impacts still concern managers. NeoBiota 25: 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. LaPaix, R., B. Freedman, and D. Patriquina. 2009. Ground vegetation as an indicator of ecological integrity. Environmental Reviews 17: 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lehre, A.K., B.D. Collins, and T. Dunne. 1983. Post-eruptive sediment budget for the North Fork Toutle River drainage, June 1980–June 1981. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie (Supplement) 46: 143–163.Google Scholar
  39. Lichter, J. 1998. Primary succession and forest development on coastal Lake Michigan sand dunes. Ecological Monographs 68: 487–510.Google Scholar
  40. Major, J.J., and L.E. Mark. 2006. Peak flow responses to landscape disturbances caused by the cataclysmic 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington. Geological Society of America Bulletin 118: 938–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Major, J.J., T.C. Pierson, R.L. Dinehart, and J.E. Costa. 2000. Sediment yield following severe volcanic disturbance—a two-decade perspective from Mount St. Helens. Geology 28: 819–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCune, B., and J.B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach (www.pcord.com).
  43. Nakashizuka, T., S. Iida, W. Suzuki, and T. Tanimoto. 1993. Seed dispersal and vegetation development on a debris avalanche on the Ontake volcano, Central Japan. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 537–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peck, D., J.M. Lazorchak, and D.J. Klemm, eds. 2003. Environmental monitoring and assessment program-surface waters: Western pilot study field operations manual for wadeable streams. Corvallis: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Western Ecology Division. http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/surfwatr/field/ewwsm01.pdf.Google Scholar
  45. Pyke, D.A., T.A. Wirth, and J.L. Beyers. 2013. Does seeding after wildfires in rangelands reduce erosion or invasive species? Restoration Ecology 21: 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/.
  47. Sala, O.E., L.A. Gherardi, L. Reichmann, E. Jobbágy, and D. Peters. 2012. Legacies of precipitation fluctuations on primary production: Theory and data synthesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society—Biological Sciences 367: 3135–3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stapanian, M.S., S.D. Sundberg, G.A. Baumgardner, and A. Liston. 1998. Alien plant species composition and associations with anthropogenic disturbance in North American forests. Plant Ecology 139: 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stroh, J.R., and J.A. Oyler. 1981. SCS seeding evaluation on Mount Saint Helens: assessment of grass–legume seedlings in the Mount Saint Helens blast zone and lower Toutle River mudflow. Spokane: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.Google Scholar
  50. Sun, O.J., J. Campbell, B.E. Law, and V. Wolf. 2004. Dynamics of carbon stocks in soils and detritus across chronosequences of different forest types in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Global Change Biology 10: 1470–1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Swanson, F.J., and J.J. Major. 2005. Physical events, environments, and geological–ecological interactions at Mount St. Helens, March 1980–2004. In Ecological responses to the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, ed. V.H. Dale, F.J. Swanson, and C.M. Crisafulli, 27–46. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Voight, B., H. Glicken, R.J. Janda, and P.M. Douglas. 1981. Catastrophic rockslide avalanche of May 18. In The 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens, Washington, Professional Paper 1250, ed. P.W. Lipman and D.R. Mullineaux, 347–378. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  53. Waitt, R.B., Jr., T.C. Pierson, N.S. MacLeod, R.J. Janda, B. Voight, and R.T. Holcomb. 1983. Eruption-triggered avalanche, flood, and lahar at Mount St. Helens—effects of winter snowpack. Science 221: 1394–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Washington Native Plant Society. 2006. Vascular plant list: Cowlitz county. http://www.wnps.org/plant_lists/counties/cowlitz/documents/CowlitzCounty.pdf. Accessed Nov 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology & Evolutionary BiologyThe University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research ServiceEastern Oregon Agricultural Research CenterBurnsUSA

Personalised recommendations