Skip to main content

Irons’ Patch Test

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1615 Accesses

Abstract

To judge the quality of any element formulation, starting from resolving controversies that surrounded Taig’s four-node element, the patch test (The author failed to locate the first publication where Irons introduced this revolutionary concept of the patch test. In internal documents of Rolls-Royce, Derby, UK, most likely in the early sixties, definitely after the groundwork of Taig (Structural analysis by the matrix displacement method. Tech. rep., British Aircraft Corporation, Warton Aerodrome: English Electric Aviation Limited, Report Number SO 17 based on work performed ca. 1957, 1962), Irons presented the concept. In 1965 (Irons et al., Triangular elements in plate bending–conforming and nonconforming solutions. In: Proceedings of the conference of matrix methods. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, 1965), Irons first authored a paper on plate bending where the issue beyond constant stress elements was unavoidable.) furnished a guideline. Irons thus made the most fundamental contribution in the science of finite elements. Irons’ (co-authored) books, e.g. Irons and Razzaque (Experience with the patch test for convergence of finite elements method. In: Aziz A (ed) Mathematical foundations of the finite element method with application to partial differential equations. Academic, New York, pp 557–587, 1972), Irons and Ahmad (Techniques of finite elements. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1980), Irons and Shrive (Finite element primer. Wiley, New York, 1983), bear testament to his tremendous insight in analyzing spatially discretized field problems of mathematical physics. This innovative notion has inspired researchers, for example Anufariev et al. (Exactly equilibrated fields, can they be efficiently used in a posteriory error estimation? In: Physics and mathematics. Scientists notes of the Kazan University, vol 148. Kazan University, Kazan, pp 94–143, 2006), Stewart and Hughes (Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 158(1):1–22, 1998), over the last 50 years or so (Professor Robert L. Taylor in: http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/projects/feap/example.pdf furnishes explanations with numerical examples.) and no doubt many more interesting papers will appear on this subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Eight nodal degrees-of-freedom can accommodate eight (independent) Rayleigh modes.

  2. 2.

    A tutorial style lecture note can be found at: http://www.colorado.edu/engineering/CAS/courses.d/AFEM.d/AFEM.Ch15.d/AFEM.Ch15.pdf.

  3. 3.

    Incompatible modes, reduced integration, hybrid elements, incompatible mode elements, volumetric locking, near-incompressible materials are some of the important concepts that will not be addressed here.

  4. 4.

    After the deformation, overlapping and/or gap can develop due to inter-element incompatibility in displacements.

  5. 5.

    Recall that pure bending is without shear force.

  6. 6.

    Where locking originates from “parasitic” displacements in the finite element interpolants.

  7. 7.

    Does not run afoul of the Ritz variational theorem on a piecewise tessellated domain.

  8. 8.

    The absence of the η 2 and ξ 2 imposed constraints that contaminated finite element solutions relative to their analytical counterparts.

  9. 9.

    No additional incompatible mode functions need to be introduced on an ad-hoc basis. Rayleigh modes, which comply with point-wise equilibrium, will automatically encompass all polynomial terms without resorting to additional remedies.

  10. 10.

    Figure 6.3 shows the nodal forces derived as virtual work quantities. Numerical details of nodal forces as virtual work quantities are given in [4]. Both constant and flexure stresses are addressed there.

  11. 11.

    We examine, in [4] the case of pure bending when non-rectangular elements are patched together.

  12. 12.

    A wide range of internet documents can be studied according to the taste and background of the reader.

  13. 13.

    Needless to state that the author is expressing his personal views.

  14. 14.

    This patch is repeatedly cited because all five possible forms of four-node elements are encompassed here. We follow the element numbering to respectively identify: rectangular, trapezoidal, irregular convex, degenerated triangle, and concave elements.

  15. 15.

    Note that element types and pose formidable challenge to numerically evaluate the \(\Big(\left [b\right ]^{T}\ \left [d\right ]\ \left [b\right ]\Big)\) integral when the Taig transformation (ξ, η) of Eq. (5.10) is invoked.

  16. 16.

    This is elaborated in Sect. 7.2.1.2. Clough commented: nodal forces should be virtual work quantities. Consequently, incompatible Rayleigh mode vectors should introduce vertical nodal forces, which are essential for patch tests, even for horizontal boundary tractions.

References

  1. Anufariev IE, Korneev VG, Kostylev VS (2006) Exactly equilibrated fields, can they be efficiently used in a posteriory error estimation? In: Physics and mathematics. Scientists notes of the Kazan University, vol 148. Kazan University, Kazan, pp 94–143. uDK 519.63

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bower AF (2009) Applied mechanics of solids. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clough RW (1990) Original formulation of the finite element method. Finite Elem Anal Des 7:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dasgupta G (2014) Locking-free compressible quadrilateral finite elements: Poisson’s ratio-dependent vector interpolants. Acta Mech 225(1):309–330

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Irons BM, Ahmad S (1980) Techniques of finite elements. Ellis Horwood, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  6. Irons BM, Razzaque A (1972) Experience with the patch test for convergence of finite elements method. In: Aziz A (ed) Mathematical foundations of the finite element method with application to partial differential equations. Academic, New York, pp 557–587

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Irons B, Shrive N (1983) Finite element primer. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Irons B, Zienkiewicz OC, Cheung YK, Bazeley GP (1965) Triangular elements in plate bending–conforming and nonconforming solutions. In: Proceedings of the conference of matrix methods. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacNeal RH (1987) A theorem regarding the locking of tapered four-noded membrane elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(9):1793–1799

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. MacNeal RH (1989) Toward a defect-free four-noded membrane element. Finite Elem Anal Des 5(1):31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Macneal RH, Harder RL (1985) A proposed standard set of problems to test finite element accuracy. Finite Elem Anal Des 1(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart JR, Hughes TJ (1998) A tutorial in elementary finite element error analysis: a systematic presentation of a priori and a posteriori error estimates. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 158(1):1–22

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Strang G (1972) Variational crimes in the finite element method. In: Aziz AK (ed) Mathematical foundations of the finite element method with application to partial differential equations. Proceedings Symposium, University of Maryland, Baltimore. Academic, New York, pp 689–710

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taig IC (1962) Structural analysis by the matrix displacement method. Tech. rep., British Aircraft Corporation, Warton Aerodrome: English Electric Aviation Limited, Report Number SO 17 based on work performed ca. 1957

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson EL (2003) Static and dynamic analysis of structures. Computers & Structures, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson EL, Ibrahimbegovic A (1990) Use of incompatible displacement modes for the calculation of element stiffnesses or stresses. Finite Elem Anal Des 7(3):229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson EL, Taylor RL, Doherty WP, Ghaboussi J (1973) Incompatible displacement models. In: Fenves SJ, Perrone N, Robinson AR, Schnobrich WC (eds) Numerical and computer models in structural mechanics. Academic, New York, pp 43–57

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dasgupta, G. (2018). Irons’ Patch Test . In: Finite Element Concepts. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7423-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7423-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7421-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7423-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics