Skip to main content

Finite Element Basics with the Bar Element: Uniaxial Deformations—Interpolants, Stiffness Matrices and Nodal Loads

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Finite Element Concepts
  • 1939 Accesses

Abstract

In this introductory chapter, we emphasize important concepts of the finite element method using simple, intuitive examples. An undergraduate engineering mathematics background should be adequate. However, the basic operations with linear algebra and differential equations are reviewed within the context.

The finite element method, even for unbounded media, projects continuum solutions—governed by (partial) differential equations—into a finite dimensional vector space. Strikingly enough, the merit of the method permits the introduction of all basic (physical and mathematical) ideas with one-dimensional bar examples. The deformation analysis of a system of bars captures all essential aspects of thermo-mechanical behavior. Thus, this chapter provides a foundation for the topics developed in this textbook. In association with characteristic “internal forces,” which guarantee equilibrium to yield quality solutions, there are independent Rayleigh displacement modes. These finite number of basis functions (blending functions or interpolants) are the fundamental objects of the finite element method. The resulting nodal forces and displacements yield symmetric (positive semi-definite) system matrices.

The “energy minimization” concept is introduced using a single spring element (a single degree-of-freedom system). In order to reinforce the idea of degrees-of-freedom and of the energy-like scalars, the physical Rayleigh mode is introduced as the fundamental pattern of deformation.

Generalization, e.g. frame invariance concepts, in two- and three-dimensions, involves “inversion” of rectangular matrices; the associated pseudoinverse concept is introduced within that context. Discrete representation with indicial notation is described in detail, and weak solutions are introduced within a smaller dimensional vector space.

Many details (unfamiliar to advanced undergraduates), which are addressed in the successive chapters, can be skipped during introductory readings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is essential, otherwise the energy stored due to deformation will not be positive.

  2. 2.

    These concepts have been stated at the very beginning in Sect. 1.1.

  3. 3.

    This is not the work done by the external force; there is no \(\frac{1} {2}\) in the expression.

  4. 4.

    The Method of Finding Plane Curves that Show Some Property of Maximum or Minimum…, Laussanne and Geneva, 1744,” also “L. Euler, Opera Omnia I, Vol. XXIV, C. Carathéodory, ed. Bern, 1952.

  5. 5.

    A “function” of functions. Specifically, this is an alternate method of solving partial differential equations whose variables could be vector components.

  6. 6.

    This establishes the principle of virtual work and variational calculus to be equivalent.

  7. 7.

    John Forbes Nash extended the formalism to parabolic partial differential equations.

  8. 8.

    This has been utilized in solving problems of statics since antiquity.

  9. 9.

    We imply that the force-displacement relation is linear and the strain energy is a quadratic function of displacement.

  10. 10.

    In Fig. 1.2 the same bar model approximates the spring of Fig. 1.3 that is shown as a two-dimensional graphic of a three-dimensional model with a viewpoint of \(\left \{0,-2, 1/2\right \}\).

  11. 11.

    The mass of the system leads to the inertia related parameters; the resulting dynamic responses are outside the scope of this textbook.

  12. 12.

    The displacement profile u(x), which is a function of the coordinate x, is assumed to be small enough so that the linear theory of kinematics can be adopted.

  13. 13.

    This is also called the skin force.

  14. 14.

    The basic approximation is that u(x) is a linear combination of ϕ 1(x) and ϕ 2(x). 

  15. 15.

    We will depict the force intensity with arrows (in Fig. 1.19) to avoid clutter in Fig. 1.15.

  16. 16.

    Disregarding \(f(x)\neq 0\mbox{ or spatial variability in }\mathcal{A}(x)\ \mathcal{E}(x)\) in Eq. (1.22b).

  17. 17.

    This also points out the relation between the order of finite element strain and the number of element nodes. Even then, the finite element approximation with a two-node bar element will be a linear displacement field.

  18. 18.

    Kinematic quantities, in general.

  19. 19.

    In finite element methods, stiffness matrices \(\left [k\right ]\) occupy a very special status.

  20. 20.

    This will be elaborated in Sect. 1.5 in detail.

  21. 21.

    It is not obvious that \(\left [k\right ]\) is symmetric, and does not have any negative eigenvalue. The energy concept encompasses these crucial facts within positive semi-definiteness.

  22. 22.

    Assuming \(\left.\left (\frac{\partial A} {\partial y} \right )\right \vert _{z,x} = \left.\left (\frac{\partial B} {\partial x} \right )\right \vert _{y,z}; \left.\left (\frac{\partial B} {\partial z} \right )\right \vert _{x,y} = \left.\left (\frac{\partial C} {\partial y} \right )\right \vert _{z,x}; \left.\left (\frac{\partial C} {\partial x} \right )\right \vert _{y,z} = \left.\left (\frac{\partial A} {\partial z} \right )\right \vert _{x,y}\).

  23. 23.

    Appendix F describes the variational formulation for the steady temperature problem.

  24. 24.

    This has been repeated (several times) to anchor the FEM to the energy principle.

  25. 25.

    A multiplicative neutral does not change any object after being multiplied (in a generalized sense) by it. Hence, we can formally call \(\delta \!\left \{u\right \}\) a “unit virtual displacement.”

  26. 26.

    Related to minimization where an inner product, e.g. conjugations of forces and displacements, is crucial.

  27. 27.

    Exact interpolation of arbitrary uniform displacement fields generates equilibrium for the entre system.

  28. 28.

    This idea guarantees the correct identification of nodal forces in Chap. 7

  29. 29.

    For a positive semi-definite matrix, which is real and symmetric, the eigenvalues are either positive or zero. For positive definite matrices, all eigenvalues are positive.

  30. 30.

    In Fig. 1.22, the axial degrees-of-freedom are along the (x, y) axes.

  31. 31.

    Conventionally, we include “[]” after a Mathematica function name.

  32. 32.

    It will be shown in Chap. 8, for incompressible elements, such pseudoinverses are essential.

  33. 33.

    The stiffness matrix \(\left [k^{{\ast}}\right ],\) in Eq. (1.95), is a closed-form expression in terms of its local nodal coordinates. We can directly use this equation in 3-D computer programs.

  34. 34.

    To generalize the bar problem, we observe that all partial differential equations of mathematical physics are of even order. Hence linear interpolants are mandatory.

  35. 35.

    Plate bending problems are not considered in this textbook.

  36. 36.

    A Civil Engineer (in today’s definition) furnished the factorization in conjunction with Surveying and Cartography that inevitably used with a lot of polygons and triangulizations.

References

  1. Artstein-Avidan S, Milman V (2008) The concept of duality for measure projections of convex bodies. J Funct Anal 254(10):2648–2666

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Israel A, Greville TN (2000) Generalized inverses: theory and applications. 2nd edn. Springer, New York. Canadian Mathematical Society

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Courant R (1943) Variational methods for the solution of problems of equilibrium and vibration. Bull Am Math Soc 49(1):1–29

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaul L (2011) From Newton’s principia via lord Rayleigh’s theory of sound to finite elements. In: GAMM: Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics. Springer, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gelfand IM, Fomin SV (2000) Calculus of variations. Dover Publications, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta KK, Meek JL (1996) A brief history of the beginning of the finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39:3761–3774

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanc J, Taylor EF (2004) From conservation of energy to the principle of least action: a story line. Am Assoc Phys Teach 72(4):514–521

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hu HC (1954) On some variational principles in the theory of elasticity and the theory of plasticity. Acta Phys Sin 10:259–290. Also see, variational principles of the theory of elasticity with applications, Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  9. McAlarney ME, Dasgupta G, Moss ML, Moss-Salentijn L (1991) Boundary macroelements and finite elements in biological morphometrics: a preliminary comparison. Presented at the computers in biomedicine conference. In: Held KD, Brebbia CA, Ciskowski RD (eds) Computers in biomedicine. Computational Mechanics Publisher, Southampton, pp 61–72

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moore EH (1920) On the reciprocal of the general algebraic matrix. Bull Am Math Soc 26: 394–395

    Google Scholar 

  11. Penrose R (1955) On a generalized inverse for matrices. Proc Camb Philos Soc 51:406–413

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Rayleigh JWS, Lindsay RB (2011) The theory of sound 2 volume set. Cambridge Library Collection–Physical Sciences, reissue edition. Dover Publications, New York [1945]

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ritz W (1908) Über eine neue methode zur lösung gewisser variationalprobleme der mathematischen physik. J Reine Angew Math 135:1–61

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Stakgold I (1967) Boundary value problems of mathematical physics. Series in Advanced mathematics and theoretical physics, vol 1. Macmillan Co., New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dasgupta, G. (2018). Finite Element Basics with the Bar Element: Uniaxial Deformations—Interpolants, Stiffness Matrices and Nodal Loads. In: Finite Element Concepts. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7423-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7423-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7421-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7423-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics