Abstract
The evaluation of landscape patterns is necessary to explain the relationships between ecological processes and spatial patterns and between the processes and patterns and the factors that control them or that they control. For decades, landscape metrics have been used to measure and abstract landscape patterns. Since the emergence of FRAGSTATS in 1993, the measures and methods incorporated in this software have become widely used and are now a de facto standard tool for calculating landscape metrics. However, there are no special metrics unique to forest landscapes. The selection of metrics depends on the purpose of the study rather than on the land use or cover type. However, some metrics are more often used for forested landscapes (e.g., core area metrics). Forest landscape patterns are changing fast due to both natural and human disturbances. Remote sensing offers a rapid method of acquiring up-to-date information over a large geographical area and is therefore widely used as a source of the data needed for pattern assessment and the calculation of landscape metrics. However, to obtain meaningful results, correct preparation of the data is essential. In this chapter, we review the various metrics used to measure forest landscapes for different purposes. We deal with five main issues from the perspective of forest landscape patterns: (1) data preparation before the calculation of metrics (e.g., vector vs. raster data, scale, classification) and the associated uncertainties, (2) measurements of a landscape’s configuration and composition using metrics, (3) interpretation of the results, (4) possible uses of the outcomes, and (5) future perspectives (e.g., 3D and 4D landscape metrics).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abdullah SA, Nakagoshi N (2007) Forest fragmentation and its correlation to human land use change in the state of Selangor, peninsular Malaysia. For Ecol Manag 241(1–3):39–48. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.016
Aguiar FC, Fernandes MR, Ferreira MT (2011) Riparian vegetation metrics as tools for guiding ecological restoration in riverscapes. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 402:21. doi:10.1051/Kmae/2011074
Albeke SE, Nibbelink NP, Mu L, Ellsworth DJ (2010) Measuring boundary convexity at multiple spatial scales using a linear “moving window” analysis: an application to coastal river otter habitat selection. Landsc Ecol 25(10):1575–1587. doi:10.1007/s10980-010-9528-4
Arnot C, Fisher PF, Wadsworth R, Wellens J (2004) Landscape metrics with ecotones: pattern under uncertainty. Landsc Ecol 19(2):181–195
Baker WL, Cai YM (1992) The R le-programs for multiscale analysis of landscape structure using the grass geographical information-system. Landsc Ecol 7(4):291–302. doi:10.1007/Bf00131258
Baker ME, Weller DE, Jordan TE (2006) Improved methods for quantifying potential nutrient interception by riparian buffers. Landsc Ecol 21(8):1327–1345. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-0020-0
Baker ME, Weller DE, Jordan TE (2007) Effects of stream map resolution on measures of riparian buffer distribution and nutrient retention potential. Landsc Ecol 22(7):973–992. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9080-z
Baldwin DJB, Weaver K, Schnekenburger F, Perera AH (2004) Sensitivity of landscape pattern indices to input data characteristics on real landscapes: implications for their use in natural disturbance emulation. Landsc Ecol 19(3):255–271
Baskent EZ (1999) Controlling spatial structure of forested landscapes: a case study towards landscape management. Landsc Ecol 14(1):83–97. doi:10.1023/A:1008071307848
Baskent EZ, Jordan GA (1996) Designing forest management to control spatial structure of landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 34(1):55–74. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(95)00200-6
Batista T, Mendes P, Carvalho L, Vila-Vicosa C, Gomes CP (2012) Suitable methods for landscape evaluation and valorization: the third dimension in landscape metrics. Acta Bot Gallica 159(2):161–168. doi:10.1080/12538078.2012.696930
Berry JK (2007) Map analysis: understanding spatial patterns and relationships. GeoTec Media
Blaschke T, Tiede D, Heurich M (2004) 3D landscape metrics to modelling forest structure and diversity based on laser scanning data. Remot Sens Spat Inform Sci 8:129–132
Bogaert J, Van Hecke P, Salvador-Van Eysenrode D, Impens I (2000) Landscape fragmentation assessment using a single measure. Wildl Soc Bull 28(4):875–881
Boots B, Csillag F (2006) Categorical maps, comparisons, and confidence. J Geogr Syst 8(2):109–118
Bregt AK, Denneboom J, Gesink HJ, Vanranden Y (1991) Determination of rasterizing error—a case-study with the soil map of the Netherlands. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 5(3):361–367. doi:10.1080/02693799108927861
Brown DG, Addink EA, Duh JD, Bowersox MA (2004) Assessing uncertainty in spatial landscape metrics derived from remote sensing data. Remot Sens Gis Accur Assessm:221–232
Butler BJ, Swenson JJ, Alig RJ (2004) Forest fragmentation in the Pacific Northwest: quantification and correlations. For Ecol Manag 189(1–3):363–373. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2003.09.013
Buyantuyev A, Wu JG (2007) Effects of thematic resolution on landscape pattern analysis. Landsc Ecol 22(1):7–13. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-9010-5
Cain DH, Riitters K, Orvis K (1997) A multi-scale analysis of landscape statistics. Landsc Ecol 12(4):199–212. doi:10.1023/A:1007938619068
Cardille JA, White JC, Wulder MA, Holland T (2012) Representative landscapes in the forested area of Canada. Environ Manag 49(1):163–173. doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9785-2
Chirici G, McRoberts RE, Winter S, Bertini R, Brandli UB, Asensio IA, Bastrup-Birk A, Rondeux J, Barsoum N, Marchetti M (2012) National forest inventory contributions to forest biodiversity monitoring. For Sci 58(3):257–268. doi:10.5849/forsci.12-003
Clarke KC, Brass JA, Riggan PJ (1994) A cellular-automaton model of wildfire propagation and extinction. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 60(11):1355–1367
Congalton RG (1997) Exploring and evaluating the consequences of vector-to-raster and raster-to-vector conversion. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 63(4):425–434
Corona P, Chirici G, McRoberts RE, Winter S, Barbati A (2011) Contribution of large-scale forest inventories to biodiversity assessment and monitoring. For Ecol Manag 262(11):2061–2069. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.08.044
Corry RC (2005) Characterizing fine-scale patterns of alternative agricultural landscapes with landscape pattern indices. Landsc Ecol 20(5):591–608. doi:10.1007/s10980-004-5036-8
Cushman SA, McGariyal K, Neel MC (2008) Parsimony in landscape metrics: strength, universality, and consistency. Ecol Indic 8(5):691–703. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.12.002
De Chant T, Gallego AH, Saornil JV, Kelly M (2010) Urban influence on changes in linear forest edge structure. Landsc Urban Plan 96(1):12–18. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.006
Decout S, Manel S, Miaud C, Luque S (2012) Integrative approach for landscape-based graph connectivity analysis: a case study with the common frog (Rana temporaria) in human-dominated landscapes. Landsc Ecol 27(2):267–279. doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9694-z
Diaz-Varela ER, Marey-Perez MF, Rigueiro-Rodriguez A, Alvarez-Alvarez P (2009) Landscape metrics for characterization of forest landscapes in a sustainable management framework: potential application and prevention of misuse. Ann For Sci 66(3). doi:10.1051/Forest/2009004
Duveneck MJ, Scheller RM, White MA, Handler SD, Ravenscroft C (2014) Climate change effects on northern Great Lake (USA) forests: a case for preserving diversity. Ecosphere 5(2):23. doi:10.1890/Es13-00370.1
Echeverria C, Coomes D, Salas J, Rey-Benayas JM, Lara A, Newton A (2006) Rapid deforestation and fragmentation of Chilean Temperate Forests. Biol Conserv 130(4):481–494. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.017
Echeverria C, Coomes DA, Hall M, Newton AC (2008) Spatially explicit models to analyze forest loss and fragmentation between 1976 and 2020 in southern Chile. Ecol Model 212(3–4):439–449. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.10.045
Elkie PC, Rempel RS, Carr AP (1999) Patch analyst user’s manual—a tool for quantifying landscape structure. NWST Tech Manual TM-002
Erdody TL, Moskal LM (2010) Fusion of LiDAR and imagery for estimating forest canopy fuels. Remote Sens Environ 114(4):725–737. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.002
Estreguil C, Caudullo G, de Rigo D, San Miguel J (2012) Forest landscape in Europe: pattern. Fragmentation and Connectivity, European Commission
Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419
Fall A, Fall J (2001) A domain-specific language for models of landscape dynamics. Ecol Model 141(1–3):1–18. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00334-9
Farina A (2000) Landscapes ecology in action. Kluwer Academis Publishers, Dordrecht
Fassnacht KS, Cohen WB, Spies TA (2006) Key issues in making and using satellite-based maps in ecology: a primer. For Ecol Manag 222(1–3):167–181. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.09.026
Fauth PT, Gustafson EJ, Rabenold KN (2000) Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern US. Landsc Ecol 15(7):621–631
Favier C, Dubois MA (2004) Reconstructing forest savanna dynamics in Africa using a cellular automata model, FORSAT. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3305:484–491
Fernandes MR, Aguiar FC, Ferreira MT (2011) Assessing riparian vegetation structure and the influence of land use using landscape metrics and geostatistical tools. Landsc Urban Plan 99(2):166–177. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.001
Fernandes MR, Aguiar FC, Ferreira MT, Pereira JMC (2013) Spectral separability of riparian forests from small and medium-sized rivers across a latitudinal gradient using multispectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens 34(7):2375–2401. doi:10.1080/01431161.2012.744491
Foody GM (1992) A fuzzy-sets approach to the representation of vegetation continua from remotely sensed data—an example from lowland heath. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 58(2):221–225
Forest Europe (2011) State of Europe’s Forests 2011. Status and Trends in Sustainable Forest Management in Europe FOREST EUROPE. UNECE and FAO
Fortin MJ, Boots B, Csillag F, Remmel TK (2003) On the role of spatial stochastic models in understanding landscape indices in ecology. Oikos 102(1):203–212
Fraser JS, He HS, Shifley SR, Wang WJ, Thompson FR (2013) Simulating stand-level harvest prescriptions across landscapes: LANDIS PRO harvest module design. Can J For Res 43(10):972–978. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2013-0190
Gaines KF, Porter DE, Punshon T, Brisbin IL (2005) A spatially explicit model of the wild hog for ecological risk assessment activities at the department of energy’s Savannah river site. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 11(3):567–589. doi:10.1080/10807030590949654
Gardner RH (1999) RULE: map generation and spatial analysis program. In: Klopatek JM, Gardner RH (eds) Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer, New York, NY, pp 280–303
Gardner RH, Urban DL (2007) Neutral models for testing landscape hypotheses. Landsc Ecol 22(1):15–29. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-9011-4
Garmendia A, Arroyo-Rodriguez V, Estrada A, Naranjo E, Stoner K (2013) Landscape and patch attributes impacting medium- and large-sized terrestrial mammals in a fragmented rain forest. J Trop Ecol 29:331–344. doi:10.1017/S0266467413000370
Garofano-Gomez V, Martinez-Capel F, Bertoldi W, Gurnell A, Estornell J, Segura-Beltran F (2013) Six decades of changes in the riparian corridor of a Mediterranean river: a synthetic analysis based on historical data sources. Ecohydrology 6(4):536–553. doi:10.1002/eco.1330
Gasparri NI, Grau HR (2009) Deforestation and fragmentation of Chaco dry forest in NW Argentina (1972-2007). For Ecol Manag 258(6):913–921. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.024
Gharehaghaji M, Shabani AA, Feghhi J, Danehkar A, Kaboli M, Ashrafi S (2012) Effects of landscape context on bird species abundance of tree fall gaps in a temperate deciduous forest of Northern Iran. For Ecol Manag 267:182–189. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.001
Gillespie TW, Walter H (2001) Distribution of bird species richness at a regional scale in tropical dry forest of Central America. J Biogeogr 28(5):651–662
Gillespie TW, Foody GM, Rocchini D, Giorgi AP, Saatchi S (2008) Measuring and modelling biodiversity from space. Prog Phys Geogr 32(2):203–221. doi:10.1177/0309133308093606
Granell C, Havlik D, Schade S, Sabeur Z, Delaney C, Pielorz J, Uslander T, Mazzetti P, Schleidt K, Kobernus M, Havlik F, Bodsberg NR, Berre A, Mon JL (2016) Future Internet technologies for environmental applications. Environ Model Softw 78:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.12.015
Gurrutxaga M, Rubio L, Saura S (2011) Key connectors in protected forest area networks and the impact of highways: a transnational case study from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe). Landsc Urban Plan 101(4):310–320. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.036
Gustafson EJ (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1(2):143–156. doi:10.1007/s100219900011
Gustafson EJ, Crow TR (1996) Simulating the effects of alternative forest management strategies on landscape structure. J Environ Manag 46(1):77–94. doi:10.1006/jema.1996.0008
Gustafson EJ, Sturtevant BR (2013) Modeling forest mortality caused by drought stress: implications for climate change. Ecosystems 16(1):60–74. doi:10.1007/s10021-012-9596-1
Hagen-Zanker A (2016) A computational framework for generalized moving windows and its application to landscape pattern analysis. Int J Appl Earth Obs 44:205–216. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2015.09.010
Haque U, Huda M, Hossain A, Ahmed SM, Moniruzzaman M, Haque R (2009) Spatial malaria epidemiology in Bangladeshi highlands. Malar J 8:185. doi:10.1186/1475-2875-8-185
Hardt E, dos Santos RF, de Pablo CL, de Agar PM, Pereira-Silva EFL (2013) Utility of landscape mosaics and boundaries in forest conservation decision making in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Landsc Ecol 28(3):385–399. doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9845-5
Harper KA, Macdonald SE, Burton PJ, Chen JQ, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Roberts D, Jaiteh MS, Esseen PA (2005) Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 19(3):768–782. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x
Hayes JJ, Robeson SM (2011) Relationships between fire severity and post-fire landscape pattern following a large mixed-severity fire in the Valle Vidal, New Mexico, USA. For Ecol Manag 261(8):1392–1400. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.01.023
Hoechstetter S, Walz U, Dang LH, Thinh NX (2008) Effects of topography and surface roughness in analyses of landscape structure—a proposal to modify the existing set of landscape metrics. Landsc Online 3:1–14
Holland GJ, Bennett AF (2009) Differing responses to landscape change: implications for small mammal assemblages in forest fragments. Biodivers Conserv 18(11):2997–3016. doi:10.1007/s10531-009-9621-7
Hou W, Walz U (2013) Enhanced analysis of landscape structure: inclusion of transition zones and small-scale landscape elements. Ecol Indic 31:15–24. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.11.014
Jackson VL, Laack LL, Zimmerman EG (2005) Landscape metrics associated with habitat use by ocelots in south Texas. J Wildl Manag 69(2):733–738
Jenness J (2005) Topographic position index (tip_jen.avx) extension for ArcView 3.x., Jenness Enterprises. http://www.jennessent.com/arview/tpi.htm
Jomaa I, Auda Y, Hamze M, Abi saleh B, Safi S (2009) Analysis of eastern mediterranean oak forests over the period 1965–2003 using landscape indices on a patch basis. Landsc Res 34(1):105–124. doi:10.1080/01426390802591569
Jung M (2012) LecoS-A QGIS plugin to conduct landscape ecology statistics, http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/LecoS
Kelly M, Tuxen KA, Stralberg D (2011) Mapping changes to vegetation pattern in a restoring wetland: finding pattern metrics that are consistent across spatial scale and time. Ecol Indic 11(2):263–273. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.05.003
Kintz DB, Young KR, Crews-Meyer KA (2006) Implications of land use/land cover change in the buffer zone of a National Park in the Tropical Andes. Environ Manag 38(2):238–252. doi:10.1007/s00267-005-0147-9
Kirk DA, Welsh DA, Baker JA, Thompson ID, Csizy M (2012) Avian assemblages differ between old-growth and mature white pine forests of Ontario, Canada: a role for supercanopy trees? Avian Conserv Ecol 7(1):4. doi:10.5751/Ace-00503-070104
Klug H, Kmoch A (2015) Operationalizing environmental indicators for real time multi-purpose decision making and action support. Ecol Model 295:66–74
Kouba Y, Alados CL (2012) Spatio-temporal dynamics of Quercus faginea forests in the Spanish Central Pre-Pyrenees. Eur J For Res 131(2):369–379. doi:10.1007/s10342-011-0509-1
Kulldorff M (1997) A spatial scan statistic. Commun Stat Theor Methods 26(6):1481–1496. doi:10.1080/03610929708831995
Kupfer JA (2012) Landscape ecology and biogeography: rethinking landscape metrics in a post-FRAGSTATS landscape. Prog Phys Geogr 36(3):400–420. doi:10.1177/0309133312439594
Lafortezza R, Corry RC, Sanesi G, Brown RD (2005) Quantitative approaches to landscape spatial planning: clues from landscape ecology. Sust Developm Plan 84:239–250
Lang S, Tiede D (2003) vLATE Extension für ArcGIS—vektorbasiertes Tool zur quantitativen Landschaftsstrukturanalyse. Presented at German ESRI Anwenderkonferenz, Innsbruck. https://sites.google.com/site/largvlate/gis-tools/v-late
Langford WT, Gergel SE, Dietterich TG, Cohen W (2006) Map misclassification can cause large errors in landscape pattern indices: examples from habitat fragmentation. Ecosystems 9(3):474–488. doi:10.1007/s10021-005-0119-1
Larsson TB (2001) Biodiversity evaluation tools for European forests. Eur For Inst Proc 38:75–81
Laurent E (2006) Methods for generating patch and landscape metrics. Paper presented at the Conservation Design Workshop, St. Louis, MO, April 11, 2006
Lausch A, Herzog F (2002) Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability. Ecol Indic 2(1–2):3–15
Lechner AM, Langford WT, Bekessy SA, Jones SD (2012) Are landscape ecologists addressing uncertainty in their remote sensing data? Landsc Ecol 27(9):1249–1261. doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9791-7
Lechner AM, Reinke KJ, Wang Y, Bastin L (2013) Interactions between landcover pattern and geospatial processing methods: effects on landscape metrics and classification accuracy. Ecol Complex 15:71–82. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.03.003
Leitao AB, Ahern J (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59(2):65–93
Lethbridge MR, Westphal MI, Possingham HP, Harper ML, Souter NJ, Anderson N (2010) Optimal restoration of altered habitats. Environ Model Softw 25(6):737–746. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.11.013
Li HB, Wu JG (2004) Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landsc Ecol 19(4):389–399
Li HB, Gartner DI, Mou P, Trettin CC (2000) A landscape model (LEEMATH) to evaluate effects of management impacts on timber and wildlife habitat. Comput Electron Agric 27(1–3):263–292. doi:10.1016/S0168-1699(00)00088-0
Li MS, Mao LJ, Zhou CG, Vogelmann JE, Zhu ZL (2010) Comparing forest fragmentation and its drivers in China and the USA with Globcover v2.2. J Environ Manag 91(12):2572–2580. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.010
Li X, Lin JY, Chen YM, Liu XP, Ai B (2013) Calibrating cellular automata based on landscape metrics by using genetic algorithms. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 27(3):594–613. doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.698391
Li A, Dragicevicb S, Castroc FA, Sesterd M, Wintere S, Coltekinf A, Pettitg C, Jiangh B, Haworthi J, Steinj A, Chengi T (2016) Geospatial big data handling theory and methods: a review and research challenges. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 115:119–133
Lu D, Weng Q (2007) A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. Int J Remote Sens 28(5):823–870. doi:10.1080/01431160600746456
Macdonald DW, Rushton S (2003) Modelling space use and dispersal of mammals in real landscapes: a tool for conservation. J Biogeogr 30(4):607–620
MacLean MG, Congalton RG (2013) PolyFrag: a vector-based program for computing landscape metrics. GISci Remot Sens 50(6):591–603. doi:10.1080/15481603.2013.856537
Maier JAK, Hoef JMV, McGuire AD, Bowyer RT, Saperstein L, Maier HA (2005) Distribution and density of moose in relation to landscape characteristics: effects of scale. Can J For Res 35(9):2233–2243. doi:10.1139/X05-123
Majasalmi T, Rautiainen M (2016) The potential of Sentinel-2 data for estimating biophysical variables in a boreal forest: a simulation study. Remot Sens Lett 7(5):427–436. doi:10.1080/2150704X.2016.1149251
Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman, New York
Marceau DJ, Howarth PJ, Gratton DJ (1994) Remote-sensing and the measurement of geographical entities in a forested environment. 1. The scale and spatial aggregation problem. Remote Sens Environ 49(2):93–104. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(94)90046-9
Martinez S, Ramil P, Chuvieco E (2010) Monitoring loss of biodiversity in cultural landscapes. New methodology based on satellite data. Landsc Urban Plan 94(2):127–140. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.08.006
Masse A, Cote SD (2012) Linking habitat heterogeneity to space use by large herbivores at multiple scales: from habitat mosaics to forest canopy openings. For Ecol Manag 285:67–76. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.039
McAlpine CA, Eyre TJ (2002) Testing landscape metrics as indicators of habitat loss and fragmentation in continuous eucalypt forests (Queensland, Australia). Landsc Ecol 17(8):711–728
McConnell WJ, Sweeney SP, Mulley B (2004) Physical and social access to land: spatio-temporal patterns of agricultural expansion in Madagascar. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101(2–3):171–184. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.012
McGarigal K, Tagil S, Cushman SA (2009) Surface metrics: an alternative to patch metrics for the quantification of landscape structure. Landsc Ecol 24(3):433–450. doi:10.1007/s10980-009-9327-y
McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) “FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical and Continuous Maps.” Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
Miyamoto A, Sano M (2008) The influence of forest management on landscape structure in the cool-temperate forest region of central Japan. Landsc Urban Plan 86(3–4):248–256. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.03.002
Mladenoff DJ, Host GE, Boeder J, Crow TR (1996) LANDIS: a spatial model of forest landscape disturbance, succession, and management. In: Goodchild MF, Steyaert LT, Parks BO et al (eds) GIS and environmental modeling: progress and research issues. Wiley, New York, pp 175–180
Mokhtari Z, Sofyanian A, Kajeddin SJ, Ziaee H (2014) Gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern (Case Study: Isfahan, Iran). J Biodivers Environm Sci 4(6):322–333
Moore ID, Gessler PE, Nielsen GA, Petersen GA (1993) Terrain attributes: estimation methods and scale effects. In: Jakeman AJBM, McAleer M (eds) Modeling change in environmental systems. Wiley, London, pp 189–214
Mueller T, Lenz J, Caprano T, Fiedler W, Bohning-Gaese K (2014) Large frugivorous birds facilitate functional connectivity of fragmented landscapes. J Appl Ecol 51(3):684–692. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12247
Naish S, Hu W, Mengersen K, Tong S (2011) Spatial and temporal clusters of Barmah Forest virus disease in Queensland, Australia. Tropical Med Int Health 16(7):884–893. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02775.x
Narusk K (2014) Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to processing methods of satellite images (Maastikumustri indikaatorite tundlikkus satelliidipiltide rasterandmestiku töötlustehnikate suhtes). University of Tartu, Tartu
Näsi R, Honkavaara E, Lyytikäinen-Saarenmaa P, Blomqvist M, Litkey P, Hakala T, Viljanen N, Kantola T, Tanhuanpää T, Holopainen M (2015) Using UAV-based photogrammetry and hyperspectral imaging for mapping bark beetle damage at tree-level. Remote Sens 7(11):15467–15493
Neel MC, McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2004) Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area. Landsc Ecol 19(4):435–455
Nittel S (2009) A survey of geosensor networks: advances in dynamic environmental monitoring. Sensors 9(7):5664–5678
Openshaw S, Taylor PJ (1981) The modifiable areal unit problem. In: Wrigley N, Bennett RJ (eds) Quantitative geography: a british view. Routledge and Kegan, London, pp 60–70
Palmer JF (2004) Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts. Landsc Urban Plan 69(2–3):201–218. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.010
Peng J, Wang Y, Ye M, Wu J, Zhang Y (2007) Effects of land-use categorization on landscape metrics: a case study in urban landscape of Shenzhen, China. Int J Remote Sens 28(21):4877–4895. doi:10.1080/01431160601075590
Piwowar JM (1987) Conversion between vector and raster format data for geographic information systems applications. Waterloo, ON, Canada
Plante M, Lowell K, Potvin F, Boots B, Fortin MJ (2004) Studying deer habitat on Anticosti Island, Quebec: relating animal occurrences and forest map information. Ecol Model 174(4):387–399. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.035
Plexida SG, Sfougaris AI, Ispikoudis IP, Papanastasis VP (2014) Selecting landscape metrics as indicators of spatial heterogeneity-A comparison among Greek landscapes. Int J Appl Earth Obs 26:26–35. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2013.05.001
Quine CP, Watts K (2009) Successful de-fragmentation of woodland by planting in an agricultural landscape? An assessment based on landscape indicators. J Environ Manag 90(1):251–259. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.09.002
Ramezani H, Holm S, Allard A, Stahl G (2010) Monitoring landscape metrics by point sampling: accuracy in estimating Shannon’s diversity and edge density. Environ Monit Assess 164(1–4):403–421. doi:10.1007/s10661-009-0902-0
Rego F, Godinho-Ferreira P, Uva JS, Cunha J (2004) Combination of structural and compositional factors for describing forest types using NFI data, vol 51. Monitoring and Indicators for Forest Biodiversity in Europe—From Ideas to Operationality. EFI Proceedings
Remmel TK, Csillag F (2003) When are two landscape pattern indices significantly different? J Geogr Syst 5:331–351
Remmel TK, Fortin MJ (2013) Categorical, class-focused map patterns: characterization and comparison. Landsc Ecol 28(8):1587–1599. doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9905-x
Reunanen P, Fall A, Nikula A (2010) Biodiversity and ecological forest-cover domains in boreal landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 19(3):665–678. doi:10.1007/s10531-009-9726-z
Richardson JJ, Moskal LM (2011) Strengths and limitations of assessing forest density and spatial configuration with aerial LiDAR. Remote Sens Environ 115(10):2640–2651. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.020
Riitters KH, Oneill RV, Hunsaker CT, Wickham JD, Yankee DH, Timmins SP, Jones KB, Jackson BL (1995) A factor-analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landsc Ecol 10(1):23–39
Rikimaru A, Miyatake S, Dugan P (1999) Sky is the limit for forest management tool. ITTO Trop For Update 9(3):6–9
Riley SJ, DeGloria SD, Elliot R (1999) A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Int J Therm Sci 5(1–4):23–27
Robertson C, Nelson TA, Boots B, Wulder MA (2007) STAMP: spatial-temporal analysis of moving polygons. J Geogr Syst 9(3):207–227. doi:10.1007/s10109-007-0044-2
Sano M, Miyamoto A, Furuya N, Kogi K (2009) Using landscape metrics and topographic analysis to examine forest management in a mixed forest, Hokkaido, Japan: guidelines for management interventions and evaluation of cover changes. For Ecol Manag 257(4):1208–1218. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.10.005
Saura S, Martinez-Millan J (2001) Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to map spatial extent. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 67(9):1027–1036
Saura S, Torne J (2009) Conefor Sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environ Model Softw 24(1):135–139. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.05.005
Saveraid EH, Debinski DM, Kindscher K, Jakubauskas ME (2001) A comparison of satellite data and landscape variables in predicting bird species occurrences in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA. Landsc Ecol 16(1):71–83
Schetter TA, Walters TL, Root KV (2013) A multi-scale spatial analysis of native and exotic plant species richness within a mixed-disturbance oak Savanna landscape. Environ Manag 52(3):581–594. doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0120-y
Schindler S, Poirazidis K, Wrbka T (2008) Towards a core set of landscape metrics for biodiversity assessments: a case study from Dadia National Park, Greece. Ecol Indic 8(5):502–514. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.06.001
Schindler S, von Wehrden H, Poirazidis K, Wrbka T, Kati V (2013) Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates. Ecol Indic 31:41–48. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.012
Shao GF, Wu WC (2004) The effects of classification accuracy on landscape indices. Remot Sens Gis Accur Assessm:209–220
Shao GF, Wu JG (2008) On the accuracy of landscape pattern analysis using remote sensing data. Landsc Ecol 23(5):505–511. doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9215-x
Sieving KE, Willson MF, DeSanto TL (1996) Habitat barriers to movement of understory birds in fragmented south-temperate rainforest. Auk 113(4):944–949
Simova P, Gdulova K (2012) Landscape indices behavior: a review of scale effects. Appl Geogr 34:385–394. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.01.003
Sitzia T, Semenzato P, Trentanovi G (2010) Natural reforestation is changing spatial patterns of rural mountain and hill landscapes: a global overview. For Ecol Manag 259(8):1354–1362. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.048
Skole D, Tucker C (1993) Tropical Deforestation and Habitat Fragmentation in the Amazon—Satellite Data from 1978 to 1988 (Vol 260, Pg 1909, 1993). Science 261(5125):1104–1104
Soares BS, Cerqueira GC, Pennachin CL (2002) DINAMICA—a stochastic cellular automata model designed to simulate the landscape dynamics in an Amazonian colonization frontier. Ecol Model 154(3):217–235. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00059-5
Soares B, Silvestrini R, Nepstad D, Brando P, Rodrigues H, Alencar A, Coe M, Locks C, Lima L, Hissa L, Stickler C (2012) Forest fragmentation, climate change and understory fire regimes on the Amazonian landscapes of the Xingu headwaters. Landsc Ecol 27(4):585–598. doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9723-6
Solberg S, Brunner A, Hanssen KH, Lange H, Naesset E, Rautiainen M, Stenberg P (2009) Mapping LAI in a Norway spruce forest using airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens Environ 113(11):2317–2327. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.06.010
Southworth J, Nagendra H, Carlson LA, Tucker C (2004) Assessing the impact of Celaque National Park on forest fragmentation in western Honduras. Appl Geogr 24(4):303–322. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2004.07.003
Soverel NO, Coops NC, White JC, Wulder MA (2010) Characterizing the forest fragmentation of Canada’s national parks. Environ Monit Assess 164(1–4):481–499. doi:10.1007/s10661-009-0908-7
Spearman L (2003) The challenges of defining patches & patch dynamics in insect conservation biology, 2015. http://crssa.rutgers.edu/courses/lse/Web_Patch/final/Lauren/spearman_insectpatch_v2.html
Staus NL, Strittholt JR, DellaSala DA, Robinson R (2002) Rate and pattern of forest disturbance in the Klamath-Siskiyou ecoregion, USA between 1972 and 1992. Landsc Ecol 17(5):455–470. doi:10.1023/A:1021274701133
Steiniger S, Hay GJ (2009) Free and open source geographic information tools for landscape ecology. Ecol Inform 4(4):183–195. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2009.07.004
Thompson RG, Warkentin IG, Flemming SP (2008) Response to logging by a limited but variable nest predator guild in the boreal forest. Can J For Res 38(7):1974–1982. doi:10.1139/X08-049
Tittler R, Messier C, Fall A (2012) Concentrating anthropogenic disturbance to balance ecological and economic values: applications to forest management. Ecol Appl 22(4):1268–1277
Trainor AM, Walters JR, Urban DL, Moody A (2013) Evaluating the effectiveness of a Safe Harbor Program for connecting wildlife populations. Anim Conserv 16(6):610–620. doi:10.1111/acv.12035
Uezu A, Metzger JP, Vielliard JME (2005) Effects of structural and functional connectivity and patch size on the abundance of seven Atlantic Forest bird species. Biol Conserv 123(4):507–519. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.001
Uuemaa E, Roosaare J, Mander U (2005) Scale dependence of landscape metrics and their indicatory value for nutrient and organic matter losses from catchments. Ecol Indic 5(4):350–369. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.03.009
Uuemaa E, Mander U, Marja R (2013) Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: a review. Ecol Indic 28:100–106. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.018
VanDerWal J, Falconi L, Januchowski S, Shoo L, Storlie C (2011) SDMTools: species distribution modelling tools: tools for processing data associated with species distribution modelling exercises. 1.1-5. http://cran.r-project.org/
Vivoni ER, Teles V, Ivanov VY, Bras RL, Entekhabi D (2005) Embedding landscape processes into triangulated terrain models. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19(4):429–457. doi:10.1080/13658810512331325111
Vogt P, Riitters KH, Iwanowski M, Estreguil C, Kozak J, Soille P (2007) Mapping landscape corridors. Ecol Indic 7(2):481–488. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.11.001
Wade TG, Wickham JD, Nash MS, Neale AC, Riitters KH, Jones KB (2003) A comparison of vector and raster GIS methods for calculating landscape metrics used in environmental assessments. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69(12):1399–1405
Wang XL, Cumming SG (2011) Measuring landscape configuration with normalized metrics. Landsc Ecol 26(5):723–736. doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9601-7
Wang WJ, He HS, Fraser JS, Thompson FR, Shifley SR, Spetich MA (2014) LANDIS PRO: a landscape model that predicts forest composition and structure changes at regional scales. Ecography 37(3):225–229. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00495.x
Watts ME, Ball IR, Stewart RS, Klein CJ, Wilson K, Steinback C, Lourival R, Kircher L, Possingham HP (2009) Marxan with zones: software for optimal conservation based land- and sea-use zoning. Environ Model Softw 24(12):1513–1521. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.06.005
Westphal MI, Field SA, Possingham HP (2007) Optimizing landscape configuration: a case study of woodland birds in the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 81(1–2):56–66. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.015
Wu JG (2004) Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landsc Ecol 19(2):125–138
Wu JG, Shen WJ, Sun WZ, Tueller PT (2002) Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landsc Ecol 17(8):761–782
Wulder MA, White JC, Cranny M, Hall RJ, Luther JE, Beaudoin A, Goodenough DG, Dechka JA (2008) Monitoring Canada’s forests. Part 1: completion of the EOSD land cover project. Can J Remote Sens 34(6):549–562
Yu DY, Shi PJ, Han GY, Zhu WQ, SQ D, Xun B (2011) Forest ecosystem restoration due to a national conservation plan in China. Ecol Eng 37(9):1387–1397. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.03.011
Zapponi L, Del Bianco M, Luiselli L, Catorci A, Bologna MA (2013) Assessing environmental requirements effects on forest fragmentation sensitivity in two arboreal rodents. Mamm Biol 78(3):157–163. doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2012.08.005
Zaragozi B, Belda A, Linares J, Martinez-Perez JE, Navarro JT, Esparza J (2012) A free and open source programming library for landscape metrics calculations. Environ Model Softw 31:131–140. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.10.009
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grant no. IUT2-16 of the Ministry of Education and Science of Estonia and by the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions individual fellowships offered by the Horizon 2020 Programme under REA grant agreement number 660391. We also thank the reviewers and language editor for constructive and helpful comments and suggestions that helped to significantly improve this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Technical Terms
Appendix: Technical Terms
Categorical maps —Maps that define each unit of a landscape in terms of a descriptive category (e.g., forest vs. grassland) rather than quantitatively.
Central point method —A method used to convert vector data to raster data by assigning a value to a cell in a grid based on the value for the polygon that overlaps the center of the cell. See also majority rule method.
Fractal dimension —A ratio that provides a statistical index of the degree of complexity of a pattern by examining how the level of detail in a pattern changes in response to changes in the scale at which it is measured.
Free open-source software (FOSS) —Software whose source code is made available to anyone under a license in which the copyright holder provides the rights to study, change, and distribute the software to anyone and for any purpose.
Geographical information system (GIS) —A system designed to capture, store, manipulate, analyze, manage, and present all types of spatial or geographical data.
Graph theory —A mathematical description of the properties of graphs and, thus, of the pairwise relationships between variables or objects.
Image rectification—A transformation process used to project an image from a sensor’s coordinate system into a geographical coordinate system.
Landscape metrics—Algorithms that quantify specific spatial characteristics of patches, classes of patches, or entire landscape mosaics.
Leaf area index —A dimensionless quantity that characterizes plant canopies by dividing the total one-sided area of leaf tissue by the ground surface area covered by the canopy that contains those leaves.
LiDAR (light detection and ranging )—A remote sensing method that uses pulsed laser light to measure the distance between the sensor and a surface.
Majority rule method—A method used to convert vector data to raster data by using the feature that accounts for the largest area within a cell of a grid to define the attribute value assigned to the cell. See also central point method.
Map algebra—A set of primitive operations in a geographic information system (GIS) that allow two or more raster layers (“maps”) of similar dimensions to produce a new raster layer (map) using algebraic operations such as addition or subtraction.
Marxan algorithm —An algorithm used in conservation planning that aims to minimize the sum of the site-specific costs and connectivity costs for selected planning units, subject to the constraint that the conservation features in a reserve system must achieve predetermined targets.
Minimum mapping unit (MMU) —The size of the smallest feature that can be delineated within the boundaries of a map.
Modifiable areal unit problem—A challenge that occurs during the spatial analysis of aggregated data, in which the results differ when the same analysis is applied to the same data under different aggregation schemes.
Neutral landscape models —The minimum set of rules required to generate a pattern in the absence of a particular process; neutral models provide a means of testing the effect of the measured process on the patterns that are actually observed.
Open data—Data that can be freely used, reused, and redistributed by anyone, without restrictions from copyright, patents, or other mechanisms of control.
Red-edge chlorophyll index —A method used to estimate canopy chlorophyll and nitrogen contents based on remote sensing data.
SAR (synthetic aperture radar )—A form of radar that can be used to create images of objects, such as landscapes; the images can be two- or three-dimensional representations of the object.
Landscape metric scalograms—The response curves of landscape metrics to changing grain size that allow the detection of the most representative scales.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uuemaa, E., Oja, T. (2017). Mapping the Abstractions of Forest Landscape Patterns. In: Remmel, T., Perera, A. (eds) Mapping Forest Landscape Patterns. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7331-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7331-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7329-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7331-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)