Abstract
The conduct of research with human participants that focuses on religion or spirituality raises significant ethical issues. These include identification of communities that may be vulnerable and the development of special protections; the maintenance of confidentiality and privacy in relatively close-knit communities; the avoidance of stigmatization; and appropriate mechanisms for the dissemination of research findings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antle, B. J., & Regehr, C. (2003). Beyond individual rights and freedoms: Metaethics in social work research. Social Work, 48(1), 135–144.
Appelbaum, P., Roth, L., Lidz, C., & Bensens, P. W. W. (1987). False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Center Report, 2, 20–24.
Aronson Fontes, L. (1998). Ethics in family violence research: Cross-cultural issues. Family Relations, 47(1), 53–61.
Auriti, E. (2013). Who can obtain access to research data? Protecting research data against compelled disclosure. NACUA Notes, 11(7). Washington, D.C.: National Association of College and University Attorneys. https://www.calstate.edu/gc/documents/NACUANOTES-WhoCanObtainAccess-to-Research-ProtectingData.pdf. Accessed 19 December 2016.
Beauchamp, T. & Childress, J. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Davis v. Lhim. (1983). 124 Mich. App. 291, aff’d on rem 147 Mich. App. 8 (1985), rev’d on grounds of government immunity in Canon v. Thumudo, 430 Mich. 326 (1988).
De Craemer, W. (1983). A cross-cultural perspective on personhood. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 61, 19–34.
De Vries, R., DeBruin, D. A., & Goodgame, A. (2004). Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: Where should we go from here? Ethics and Behavior, 14(4), 351–368.
Denny, C. C., & Grady, C. (2007). Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 382–385.
Dresser, R. (2001). Advance directives in dementia research: Promoting autonomy and protecting subjects. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 23(1), 1–6.
Earle v. Kuklo. (1953). 26 N.J. Super. 471 (App. Div.).
Ewing v. Goldstein. (2004). 120 Cal. App. 4th 807.
Ewing v. Northridge Hospital Medical Center. (2004). 120 Cal. App. 4th 1289.
Faden, R. R., & Beauchamp, T. L. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grady, C. (2001). Money for research participation: Does it jeopardize informed consent? American Journal of Bioethics, 1(2), 40–44.
Grady, C. (2005). Payment of clinical research subjects. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 115(7), 1681–1687.
Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. (1998). Assessing competence to consent to treatment: A guide for physicians and other health professionals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hayes, C. (2011). IRA researchers at Boston College file suit against US govt. Irish Central. http://www.irishcentral.com/news/others-from-boston-college-project-file-separate-suit-to-suppressira-interviews-129168208-237409721.html. Accessed 19 June 2014.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2014). Defining the role of authors and contributors. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html. Accessed 19 June 2014.
Jablonski v. United States. (1983). 712 F.2d 391 (9th Cir.).
Kimbrough, D. L. (1995). Taking up serpents: Snake handlers of Eastern Kentucky. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Kipnis, K. (2001, March). Vulnerability in research subjects: A bioethical taxonomy. In Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants. Vol. II: commissioned papers and staff analysis (pp. G-1–G-13). Bethesda, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
Kipnis, K. (2003). Seven vulnerabilities in the pediatric research subject. Theoretical Medicine, 24, 107–120.
Largent, E. A., Grady, C., Miller, F. G., & Wertheimer, A. (2012). Money, coercion, and undue inducement: A survey of attitudes about payments to research participants. IRB, 34(1), 1–8.
Levine, R. J. (1988). Ethics and regulation of clinical research. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Levine, C., Faden, R., Grady, C., Hammerschmidt, D., Eckenwiler, L., & Sugarman, J. (2004). The limitations of “vulnerability” as a protection for human research participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 4(3), 44–49.
McIntosh v. Milano. (1979). 168 N.J. Super. 466.
National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics. http://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/code.asp. Accessed 7 July 2014.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (1998). Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity, Vol. 1. Rockville, MD: Author.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (2001). Ethical and policy issues involving human participants (Vol. 1). Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, D.C.:United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare [DHEW Pub. No. OS 78-0012].
Nuremberg Code. (1946). In K. Lebacqz & R.J. Levine. (1982). Informed consent in human research: Ethical and legal aspects. In W. T. Reich (Ed.). Encyclopedia of bioethics (p. 757). New York: The Free Press.
People v. Newman. (1973). 298 N.E.2d 651 (App. Div.).
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (rev ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press.
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. (1976). 17 Cal. 3d 425.
Thompson v. County of Alameda. (1980). 27 Cal. 3d 741.
Wager, E. & Kleinert, S. (2010). Responsible research publication: International standards for authors. A position statement developed at the Second World Conference in Research Integrity, Singapore, July 22–24. http://publicationethics.org/files/International%20standards_authors_for%20website_11_Nov_2011.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2014.
Wax, M. L. (1991). The ethics of research in American Indian communities. American Indian Quarterly, 15(4), 431–456.
Weijer, C., & Emanuel, E. J. (2000). Protecting communities in biomedical research. Science, 289, 1142–1144.
Weinstock, R., Bonnici, D., Seroussi, A., & Leong, G. S. (2014). No duty to warn in California: Now unambiguously solely a duty to protect. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 42(1), 101–108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loue, S. (2017). Ethical Issues in Conducting Research on Religion and Spirituality. In: Handbook of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work Practice and Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7039-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7039-1_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7038-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7039-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)