Skip to main content

Corporate Social Responsibility and the Three Sectors in Asia: Contexts and Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies ((NCSS))

Abstract

This chapter introduces theories, concepts, and issues related to corporate social responsibility , CSR imposition on the private sector, government moral authority in reigning in corporate greed through CSR legislation, etc. The first section of the chapter highlights the features and factors related to “corporate social responsibility,” in the context of this volume. The second section shows the external influence on national efforts in codifying and/or standardizing CSR concluding that its success depends on the political features, government–business relationship, and other dimensions of political economy in each country. Therefore, the next section highlights the main economic and political features of the countries selected for studies in this volume. The last section provides an overview of the major discussions and conclusions in different chapters in this volume.

The original version of the book was revised: For detailed information please see Erratum. The erratum to this chapter is available at 10.1007/978-1-4939-6915-9_11

An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6915-9_11

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The United Nations in 1986, to rectify the “positive rights” gap in the UNDHR, 1948, crafted the UN Declaration on the Right to Development to ensure everybody’s entitlement to, participation in, contribution to, and enjoyment of economic, social, cultural, and political development and self-determination (Article 1). The “explicitly political” declaration was not supported by most of the high-income countries because the underlying assumption of the declaration is believed to have been that the existing resources must be shared equitably assisting the marginalized people to assert their rights to these resources (Nyamu-Musembi and Cornwall 2004).

  2. 2.

    Asia has 47 countries (including the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea) as well as the economies of Hong Kong SAR, Macao SAR, Taiwan, and Palestine. Due to a lack of data, the latter countries and economies are not included in the discussion.

References

  • Bakan, J. (2005). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power (p. 2005). NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1989). Theories of justice. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. (2001). On the goals of development. In G. M. Meier & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), Frontiers of development economics. The future in perspective (pp. 61–86). New York: Oxford University Press. Accessed on January 10, 2016. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2001/03/28/000094946_01032805420961/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf

  • Bhagwati, J. N. (2002). Democracy and development: Cruel dilemma or symbiotic relationship? Review of Development Economics, 6(2), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitanga, J., & Bridwell, L. (2010). Social responsibility and the United Nations global compact. Competition Forum, 8, 265–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts. Research and Practice, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castka, P., et al. (2005). Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into ISO management systems-in search of a feasible CSR management system framework. TQM Magazine, 16(3), 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Ha-Joon (2008). Bad samaritans: The guilty secrets of rich nations and the threat to global prosperity. (Paperback title) London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charkiewicz, E. (2005). Corporations, the UN, and neo-liberal bio-politics. Development, 48, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claydon, Jane. (2011). A new direction for CSR: The shortcomings of previous CSR models and the rationale for a new model. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(3), 405–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, O. P. (1987). Ethics, the public service, and public policy: Some comparative reflections. International Journal of Public Administration, 10, 21–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T. (1995). Golden rule: The investment theory of party competition and the logic of money-driven political systems. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. R. (2005). An introduction to business and management ethics. London: Palgrave (Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, S. (2012). Human development: Perspectives, gaps, and issues. In S. Hasan (Ed.), The Muslim world in the twenty first century: Space, power, and human development (pp. 43–66). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, S. (2015). Modern third sector organisations in the muslim world: People, property, mutuality. In S. Hasan (Ed.), Philanthropy and Human Security: Islamic Perspectives and Muslim Majority Country Practices (pp. 147–182). New York: Springer. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., & Van Tulder, R. (2006). Poverty alleviation as business strategy? Evaluating commitments of frontrunner multinational corporations. World Development, 34(5), 789–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 595–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantos, G. P. (2002). The ethicality of altruistic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19, 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, G., & Wilson, C. (2006). A corporate solution to global poverty: How multinationals can help the poor and invigorate their own legitimacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, J., Meehan, K., & Richards, A. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: The 3C-SR model. International Journal of Social Economics, 33, 386–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J., & Rob, G. (2013). W(h)ither Ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moratis, Lars. (2014). ISO 26000: Three CSR messages for management education. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 53, 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyamu-Musembi, C., & Cornwall, A. (2004). What is the rights-based approach all about? Perspectives from international development agencies. IDS Working Paper, 234, IDS, Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80, 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, Andreas, & Ulrich, G. D. (2007). Discourse ethics and social accountability: The ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(2), 187–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinert, Erik S. (2008). How rich countries got rich and why poor countries stay poor. London: Constable and Robinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 17(3), 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy, Benedict. (2015). Defining CSR: Problems and solutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 625–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1994). Geography and social justice. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2006). Making globalization work. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2007). CSR and developing countries: What scope for government action? Innovation Briefs, Issue, 1(2007), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samiul Hasan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hasan, S. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and the Three Sectors in Asia: Contexts and Perspectives. In: Hasan, S. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility and the Three Sectors in Asia. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6915-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6915-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6913-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6915-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics