Advertisement

US Biofuel Policies and Markets

  • Gal HochmanEmail author
  • Michael Traux
  • David Zilberman
Chapter
  • 632 Downloads
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 40)

Abstract

The United States has established various policies to support a transition to biofuels from fossil fuels as part of its strategy to achieve energy security and independence. These policies include mandates, tax credits, and import tariffs aimed at developing the nascent biofuel industry. To compare the impact of various energy sources requires a comprehensive understanding of both direct and indirect effects. This chapter discusses some of the indirect effects, including land use change, fuel rebound effect, and balance of trade effect. It finds that due to the ubiquity of energy, indirect effects impact numerous markets and that an already noncompetitive energy market that is capital intensive exacerbates the challenge of introducing biofuels. While first-generation biofuels contributed to rural development and reduced dependency on imported fuel sources, they have failed to reduce GHG emissions significantly. Introduction of advanced biofuels is challenged by the blend wall in the US and high costs, there is much opportunity for them to contribute significantly to energy security but also reducing GHG emissions.

Keywords

Balance of trade Benefit and costs Biofuels Energy security Greenhouse gases Policy Risk 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by USDA/NIFA grant number 267002.

References

  1. Babcock, B.A. 2011. The Impact of U.S. Biofuel Policies on Agricultural Price Levels and Volatility. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development 35 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
  2. Babcock, B.A., and S. Pouliot. 2013. Price It and They Will Buy: How E85 Can Break the Blend Wall. CARD Policy Brief 13-PB 11, 2013. http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/dbs/pdffiles/13pb11.pdf.
  3. Babcock, B.A., and W. Zhou. 2013. The Impact on Corn Prices from Reduced Biofuel Mandates, vol. 13(543),1–15. WP: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, A.B., C. Chi-Ham, G. Barrows, S. Sexton, and D. Zilberman. 2015. Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics, Environment, Ethics, and the Future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 38: 249–279. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-050912-124612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrow, G., G. Hochman, D. Zilberman. 2012. Petroleum Refining and the Indirect Byproduct Effect of Biofuels. Presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12–14, 2012, Seattle, Washington. Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/124698/2/AAEA.summer.2012.pdf.
  6. Barrows, G., S. Sexton, and D. Zilberman. 2014. Agricultural Biotechnology: The Promise and Prospects of Genetically Modified Crops. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 99–119.Google Scholar
  7. Braeutigam, J.R. 2009. Ethanol Blend Wall CEC Joint IEPR and Transportation Committee Workshop on Transportation Fuel. CEC Joint IEPR and Transportation Committee Workshop on Transportation Fuel Infrastructure Issues.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, G. 2008. Review of Fuel Ethanol Impacts on Local Air Quality. Bioethanol for Sustainable Transport (BEST) Deliverable (D9): 14.Google Scholar
  9. Budny, D. 2007. The Global Dynamics of Biofuel: Potential Supply and Demand for Ethanol and Biodiesel in the Coming Decades. Brazil Institute 3 (1): 1–8.Google Scholar
  10. Chakravorty, U., M.H.Hubert, and L. Nostbakken. 2009. Fuel Versus Food. The Annual Review of Resource Economics 1 (NP): 645–663.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, X., Ho Huang, and M. Khanna. 2012a. Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Implications of Biofuels: Role of Technology and Policy. Climate Change Economics 3 (3): 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, X., H. Huang, M. Khanna, and H. Onal. 2012b. Meeting the Mandate for Biofuels: Implications for Land Use, Food, and Fuel Prices. Selected Works of Xiaoguang Chen 1 (7): 223–267.Google Scholar
  13. Crago, C.L., M. Khanna, J. Barton, E. Giuliani, and W. Amaral. 2010. Competitiveness of Brazilian Sugarcane Ethanol Compared to U.S. Corn Ethanol. Social Science Research Network 1 (1): 1–33.Google Scholar
  14. Cui, J., H. Lapan, G. Moschini, and J. Cooper. 2011. Welfare Impacts of Alternative Biofuel and Energy Policies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93 (5): 1235–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Gorter, H., and D.R. Just. 2009a. The Economics of a Blend Mandate for Biofuels. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (3): 738–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Gorter, H., and D.R. Just. 2009b. The Welfare Economics of a Biofuel tax Credit and the Interaction Effects with Price Contingent Farm Subsidies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (2): 477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Gorter, H., and D.R. Just. 2010. The Social Costs and Benefits of Biofuels: The Intersection of Environmental, Energy and Agricultural Policy. Applied Economic Perspective and Policy 32 (1): 4–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Demirbas, A. 2009. Political, Economic and Environmental Impacts of Biofuels: A Review. Applied Energy 86 (1): 108–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Du, X., L. Lu, and D. Zilberman. 2014. The Economics of Contract Farming: A Credit and Investment Perspective. Presented at The AAEA Meetings in Philadelphia Pennsylvania, January 2014.Google Scholar
  20. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007), (2007, December). In 110th Congress, 1st session, Public Law No 110–140. Available at https://www.congress.gov/bill/110thcongress/house-bill/6
  21. Foster, H., R. Baron, and P. Bernstein. 2011. Impact of the Blend Wall Constraint with Complying with the Renewable Fuel Standard. Available at http://www.api.org/news-and-media/news/newsitems/2013/march-2013/~/media/Files/Policy/Alternatives/13-March-RFS/CRA_RSF2_BlendwallConstraints_Final_Report.pdf.
  22. Gallagher, P., M. Dikeman, J. Fritz, E. Wailes, W. Gauther, and H. Shapouri. (2003). Biomass from Crop Residues: Cost and Supply Estimates. Agricultural Economic Report, Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture (819).Google Scholar
  23. Gardner, B., and W. Tyner. (2007). Explorations in Biofuels Economics, Policy, and History: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 5 (2).Google Scholar
  24. Hertel, T.W., A.A. Golub, A.D. Jones, M. O’Hare, R.J. Plevin, and D.M. Kammen. 2010. Effects of U.S. Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-Mediated Responses. BioScience 60 (3): 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hochman, G., and D. Zilberman. Corn Ethanol and U.S. Biofuel Policy Ten Years Later: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. To be presented at the AAEA Meeting, July 29–August 2, 2016, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  26. Hochman, G., S.E. Sexton, and D. Zilberman. 2008. The Economics of Biofuel Policy and Biotechnology. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 6 (2).Google Scholar
  27. Hochman, G., D. Rajagopal, and D. Zilberman. 2010. Are Biofuels the Culprit: OPEC, Food, and Fuel. The American Economic Review 100 (2): 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hochman, G., D. Rajagopal, G. Timilsina, and D. Zilberman. 2011a. Quantifying the Causes of the Global Food Commodity Price Crisis. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5744, 7 (52), August 2011.Google Scholar
  29. Hochman, G., D. Rajagopal, and D. Zilberman. 2011b. The Effect of Biofuels on the International Oil Market. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 33 (3): 402–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hochman, G., G. Barrows, and D. Zilberman. 2013. U.S. Biofuels Policy: Few Environmental Benefits but Large Trade Gains. ARE Update 17 (2) (Nov/Dec 2013).Google Scholar
  31. Keeney, R., and T.W. Hertel. 2009. The Indirect Land Use Impacts of United States Biofuel Policies: The Importance of Acreage, Yield, and Bilateral Trade Responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (4): 895–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khanna, M., A. Ando, and F. Taheripour. 2008. Welfare Effects and Unintended Consequences of Ethanol Subsidies. Review of Agricultural Economics 30 (3): 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khanna, M., and C.L. Crago. 2012. Measuring Indirect Land Use Change with Biofuels: Implications for Policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics 4: 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koltz, R., A.M. Bento, and J.R. Landry. 2014. Key Economic Insights Required for Using Lifecycle Analysis for Policy Decisions. Presented at The AAEA meetings in Philadelphia Pennsylvania, January 2014.Google Scholar
  35. Lapan, H., and G. Moschini. 2009. Biofuels Policies and Welfare: Is the Stick of Mandates Better than the Carrot of Subsidies, vol. 09010 (1), 1–40. Iowa State University Working Paper, WP.Google Scholar
  36. Lapan, H., and G. Moschini. 2012. Second-Best Biofuel Policies and the Welfare Effects of Quantity Mandates and Subsidies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 63 (2): 224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miao, R., and M. Khanna. 2014. Are Bioenergy Crops Riskier than Corn? Implications for Biomass Price. Choices 29 (1): 6.Google Scholar
  38. Miller, B.A., R.J. Schaetzl, F. Krist Jr. 2009. The Soil Fertility and Drainage Indexes: Taxonomically Based, Ordinal Estimates of Relative Soil Properties. Available http://foresthealth.fs.usda.gov/soils/Content/Downloads/The_Soil_Fertility_and_Drainage_Indexes_NRCS_poster.pdf. Last accessed 21 Jan 2014.
  39. Qiu, C., G. Colson, and M. Wetzstein. 2014. An Ethanol Blend Wall Shift Is Prone to Increase Petroleum Gasoline Demand. Energy Economics 44: 160–165. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rajagopal, D., S.E. Sexton, D. Roland-Holst, and D. Zilberman. 2007. Challenge of Biofuel: Filling the Tank Without Emptying the Stomach? Environmental Research Letters 2 (4): 044004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rajagopal, D., G. Hochman, and D. Zilberman. 2011. Indirect Fuel Use Change (IFUC) and the Lifecycle Environmental Impact of Biofuel Policies. Energy Policy 30 (1): 228–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roberts, M.J., and W. Schlenker. 2013. Identifying Supply and Demand Elasticities of Agricultural Commodities: Implications for the U.S. Ethanol Mandate. American Economic Review 103 (6): 2265–2295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosegrant, M.W. (2008). Biofuels and Grain Prices: Impacts and Policy Responses, 1–4. NP: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  44. Snow, W. 2013. EPA Acknowledges Blend Wall as It Proposes 2014 Biofuel Quotas. Oil and Gas Journal. Web 2013. Available at http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/11/epa-acknowledges-blend-wall-as-it-proposes-2014-biofuel-quotas.html.
  45. Sorda, G., M. Banse, and C. Kemfert. 2010. An Overview of Biofuel Policies Across the World. Energy Policy 38 (1): 6977–6988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taheripour, F., T.W. Hertel, W.E. Tyner, J.F. Beckman, and D.K. Birur. 2009. Biofuels and Their By-Products: Global Economic and Environmental Implications. Biomass and Energy 10 (17): 1–12.Google Scholar
  47. Thompson, W., S. Meyer, and P. Westhoff. 2009. Renewable Identification Numbers are the Tracking Instrument and Bellwether of U.S. Biofuel Mandates. The Agricultural Economics Society and the European Association of Agricultural Economists 8 (3): 43–50.Google Scholar
  48. Timilsina, G.R., and A. Shrestha. 2010. Biofuels: Markets, Targets and Impacts, vol. 5364 (WP), 1–49. The World Bank Development Research Group Environment and Energy Team.Google Scholar
  49. Tyner, W.E. 2010. The Integration of Energy and Agricultural Markets. Agricultural Economics 41 (Suppl. 1): 193–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00500.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. U.S. Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.gov.
  51. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2012. Biofuels Issues and Trends no. October, 1–48. Available at papers2://publication/uuid/24B1B2ED-7BD8-41CB-9215-E749DD9CA356.Google Scholar
  52. Yang, X., N.D. Paulson, and M. Khanna. 2015. Optimal Mix of Vertical Integration and Contracting for Energy Crops: Effect of Risk Preferences and Land Quality. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, ppv029.Google Scholar
  53. Yergin, D. 2006. Ensuring Energy Security. Foreign Affairs 85 (2): 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang, Z., C., Qiu, and M., Wetzstein. 2010. Blend-Wall Economics: Relaxing U.S. Ethanol Regulations Can Lead to Increased Use of Fossil Fuels. Energy Policy 38 (7). doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.016.
  55. Zilberman, D., G. Hochman, D. Rajagopal, S. Sexton, and G. Timilsina. 2012. The Impact of Biofuels on Commodity Food Prices: Assessment of Findings. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95 (2): 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zilberman, D., G. Barrow, G. Hochman, and D. Rajagopal. 2013. On the Indirect Effect of Biofuel. The American Journal of Agricultural Economics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agriculture, Food and Resource EconomicsRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations