Advertisement

Empirical Findings from Agricultural Expansion and Land Use Change in Brazil

  • Leila HarfuchEmail author
  • Luciane Chiodi Bachion
  • Marcelo Melo Ramalho Moreira
  • André Meloni Nassar
  • Miguel Carriquiry
Chapter
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 40)

Abstract

Agricultural production will play an increasing role in the development of renewable energy sources. Modeling land use changes due to agricultural conversion continues to be a challenge. This chapter contributes by demonstrating an improved methodology to empirically determine elasticities used to compute land use change. It presents an updated land use section of the Brazilian Land Use Model, using secondary economic data, remote sensing information, and improved allocation methodology, especially with extensive margin effects, to better capture multicropping systems, livestock dynamics, and land use dynamics. It shows improved ways for economic and geospatial models to interface with each other, a necessary step in quantifying impacts of dynamic processes. The results of the simulations confirm that agriculture will continue to convert native vegetation, but sugarcane has very little direct impact on natural vegetation due to demand being met through pasture intensification. Also, deforestation rates will decrease compared to those in the past. Finally, policies to ensure compliance with agricultural intensification and guarantees from farmers of compliance with Brazilian forest regulations will be necessary to complement market forces and technological advances in biofuel crop production.

Keywords

Average Return Baseline Scenario Competition Effect Geospatial Analysis Cerrado Biome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexandratos, Nikos and Bruinsma Jelle. 2012. World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision. In FAO Agricultural Development Economics Division, ESA Working Paper No 12-03, June 2012. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/ap106e/ap106e.pdf.
  2. Al-Riffai, Perrihan, Betina Dimaranan, and David Laborde. 2010. Global Trade and Environmental Impact Study of the EU Biofuels Mandate. European Commission: Final report. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/march/tradoc_145954.pdf.
  3. Babcock, Bruce A., Miguel Carriquiry. 2010. An exploration of certain aspects of CARB’s approach to modeling indirect land use from expanded biodiesel production. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), Iowa State University, Staff Report 10-SR 105. Available at: http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/dbs/pdffiles/10sr105.pdf.
  4. Barr, Kanlaya J., Bruce A. Babcock, Miguel Carriquiry, André Nassar, Leila Harfuch. 2011. Agricultural land elasticities in the United States and Brazil. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 33(3):449–462. doi: 10.1093/aepp/ppr011.
  5. Brescia, Víctor, Daniel Lema. 2007. Supply elasticities for selected commodities in Mercosur and Bolivia. EC Project EUMercoPol (2005–08). Instituto de Economia y Sociologia, INTA (Argentina). Available at: http://inta.gob.ar/documentos/supply-elasticities-for-selected-commodities-in-mercosur-and-bolivia/.
  6. Bridges, Deborah, Frank Tenkorang. 2009. Agricultural commodities acreage value elasticity over time—implications for the 2008 farm bill. Paper presented at the American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV, February 18–21.Google Scholar
  7. De Gouvello, Christophe. 2010. Brazil low carbon country case study. Washington, World Bank. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/BRAZILEXTN/Resources/Brazil_LowcarbonStudy.pdf.
  8. De Gouvello, Christophe, Britaldo S. Filho, André Nassar (coord). 2011. Brazil low carbon case study: Technical synthesis report on land use, land-use change, and forestry. 2011. Washington, The World Bank.Google Scholar
  9. EPA—United States Environmental Protection Agency (2009). Draft regulatory impact analysis: Changes to renewable fuel standard program. Washington, EPA, May 2009. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/renewablefuels/420d09001.pdf.
  10. Ferreira, Nilson C., Laerte G. Jr, Alfredo R. Huete, Manuel E. Ferreira. 2007. An operational deforestation mapping system using MODIS data and spatial context analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing 28(1):47–62. doi: 10.1080/01431160600835861.
  11. Ferreira, Laerte G., Manuel E. Ferreira, Genival F. Rocha, Marlon Nemayer, and Nilson C Ferreira. 2009a. Dinâmica agrícola e desmatamentos em áreas de cerrado: uma análise a partir de dados censitários e imagens de resolução moderada. Revista Brasileira de Cartografia 61(2). Available at: http://www.iesa.ufg.br.
  12. Ferreira, Manuel E., Fanuel N. Garcia, and Genival F. Rocha. 2009b. Validação do Sistema Integrado de Alerta de Desmatamentos para a região de savanas no Brasil. In Natal-RN, Brazil, Anais do XIV Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto SBSR, April 25–30, INPE: 5219–5226.Google Scholar
  13. Ferreira, Manuel E., Janete R. Silva, Genival F. Rocha, Laura A. Antoniazzi, André M. Nassar, and Joana C.S. Rocha. 2011. Caracterização das áreas desmatadas do bioma Cerrado via sensoriamento remoto: uma análise sobre a expansão de culturas agrícolas e pastagens cultivadas. In Anais do XV Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto—SBSR. Curitiba-PR, Brazil, April 30–May 5, 2011. INPE: 6727.Google Scholar
  14. Ferreira Filho, Joaquim B.S. and Mark Horridge. 2014. Ethanol expansion and indirect land use change in Brazil. 2014. Land Use Policy 36(2014):595–604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.10.015.
  15. Gibbs, Holly K., Aaron S. Ruesch, Fédéric Achard, Murray K. Clayton, Peter Holmgren, Navin Ramankutty, and Jonathan A. Foley. 2010. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107(16):732–737. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910275107.
  16. GTAP—Global Trade Analysis Project. www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu.
  17. Holt, Matthew T. 1999. A linear approximate acreage allocation model. Fargo: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24(2):383–397.Google Scholar
  18. ICONE—Institute for International Trade Negotiations. www.iconebrasil.org.br.
  19. IFPRI—International Food Policy Institute. www.ifpri.org.
  20. INPE—Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. Projeto PRODES: Monitoramento da Floresta Amazônica Brasileira por Satélite. Available at: http://www.obt.inpe.br/prodes/index.html. Accessed 09 Jan 2012.
  21. Laborde, D.; Padella, M.; Edwards, R.; Marelli, L. 2014. Progress in estimates of iLUC with MIRAGE model. Italy, European Commission, JRC Scientific and Policy Reports.Google Scholar
  22. Lambin, Eric F. and Meyfroidt, Patrick. 2011. Global Land Use Change, Economic Globalization and the Looming Land Scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(9):3465–3472. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1100480108.
  23. LAPIG—Laboratorio de Processamento de Imagens e Geoprocessamento. Monitoramento Sistemático dos Desmatamentos no Bioma Cerrado (SIAD-Cerrado). Available at: http://www.lapig.iesa.ufg.br/lapig/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=52.
  24. Menezes, Tatiane A. de, Marie - Gabrielle Piketty. 2007. Possible regional impacts of agricultural trade liberalization in Brazil: some insights based on the estimation of soybean supply function. Paper prepared for presentation at the 106th seminar of the EAAE, Montpellier, France, October 25–27. Available at: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/7930/1/sp07me03.pdf.
  25. Moraes, Mauricio. 2006. Soybean Acreage Response in Brazil. Paper presented at the NCCC-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting and Market Risk Management. St. Louis, Missouri, April 17–18. Available at: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/19003/1/cp06mo01.pdf.
  26. Moreira, M.; Nassar, A.; Antoniazzi, L.; Bachion, L. C.; Harfuch, L. 2012. Direct and indirect land use change assessment. In Sustainability of sugarcane bioenergy, eds. Poppe, M. K.; Cortez, L. A. B. Center for Strategic Studies and Management (CGEE), 2012.Google Scholar
  27. Morton, Douglas C., Ruth. S. DeFries, Yosio E. Shimabukuro, Liana O. Anderson, Egidio Arai, Fernando Del Bon Espirito-Santo, Ramon Freitas, and Jeff Morisette. 2006. Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(39):14637–14641. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606377103.
  28. Nassar, André M., Leila Harfuch, Marcelo R. Moreira, Luciane Chiodi, and Laura B. Antoniazzi. 2009. Impacts on Land Use and GHG Emissions from a Shock on Brazilian Sugarcane Ethanol Exports to the United States using Brazilian Land Use Model (BLUM). Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regarding the proposed changes to the Renewable Fuel Standard Program. Available at: http://www.iconebrasil.com.br/arquivos/noticia/1872.pdf.
  29. Nassar, André M. Angelo C. Gurgel, Leila Harfuch, Marcelo. M. R. Moreira, Luciane C. Bachion, Laura B. Antoniazzi, Isaias C. Macedo, Joaquim E. A. Seabra, Manoel. R. L. V. Leal, Arnaldo C. S. Walter, and Marcelo. P. da Cunha. 2010a. European Commission Public Consultation on Indirect Land Use Change—Responses to the Consultation Document. Report to the European Commission regarding the Consultation on Indirect Land Use Change Impacts of Biofuels. Available at: http://www.iconebrasil.org.br/imagens/banco/arquivos/ICONE_EC%20iLUC%20Consultation_Comments_final.pdf.
  30. Nassar, André M.; Leila Harfuch, Marcelo M. R. Moreira, Luciane Chiodi and Laura Barcellos Antoniazzi. 2010b. Modelagem do Uso da Terra no Brasil: Documento preparado para o “Estudo de Baixo Carbono para o Brasil. Available at: http://www.iconebrasil.com.br/publicacoes/estudos/detalhes/292.
  31. Nassar, André M., Leila Harfuch, Luciane C. Bachion and Marcelo. M. R. Moreira. 2011 Biofuels and land-use changes: Searching for the top model. Interface Focus 1(2):224–232. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2010.0043.
  32. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook. www.oecd.org.
  33. Rocha, Genival F., Laerte G. Ferreira JR., Nilton C. Ferreira, and Manuel E. Ferreira. 2011. Detecção de desmatamentos no bioma Cerrado entre 2002 e 2009: padrões, tendências e impactos. Revista Brasileira de Cartografia 63(3):341–349. Available at: http://www.rbc.ufrj.br/_pdf_63_2011/63_03_3.pdf.
  34. Rudorff, Bernado F.T., Daniel A. Aguiar, Wagner F. Silva, Luciana M. Sugawara, Marcos Adami, and Mauricio A. Moreira. 2010. Studies on the rapid expansion of sugarcane for ethanol production in São Paulo State (Brazil) using landsat data. Remote Sensing 2(4):1057–1076. doi: 10.3390/rs2041057.
  35. Rudorff, Bernado F. T., Marcos Adami, Daniel A. Aguiar, Mauricio A. Moreira, Marcio P. Mello, Leandro Fabiani, Daniel F. Amaral, and Bernado M. Pires. 2011. The soy moratorium in the Amazon biome monitored by remote sensing images. Remote Sensing 3(1):185–202 doi: 10.3390/rs3010185.
  36. Shepherd, Ben. 2006. Estimating price elasticities of supply for cotton: A structural time-series approach. MPRA, Paper no. 1252, posted 07 Nov 2007. Available at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1252/1/MPRA_paper_1252.pdf.
  37. Sparovek, Gerd, Gran Berndes, Israel F. L. Klug and Alberto G. O. P. Barretto. 2010. Brazilian agriculture and environmental legislation: status and future challenges. Environmental Science & Technology 44(16):6046–6053. doi: 10.1021/es1007824.
  38. Sparovek, Gerd, Alberto Barreto, Israel Klug, Leonardo Papp, and Jane Lino. 2011. A revisão do Código Florestal brasileiro. Novos Estudos—CEBRAP 89: 111–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-33002011000100007.
  39. Vado, Ligia, David B. Willis, Samarendu Mohanty. 2004a. Future Potential of Brazilian Cotton Exports. In Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio, TX, January 5–9. Available at: http://www.aaec.ttu.edu/Publications/Beltwide%202004/D029.pdf.
  40. Vado, Ligia, David B. Willis, Samarendu Mohanty. 2004b. Cotton Supply Response in Brazil: Traditional vs. Expansion Region. In Meetings of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Tulsa, Oklahoma, February 14–18. Available at: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/34712/1/sp04va01.pdf.
  41. Wageningen UR (University and Research Centre). www.wur.nl/UK.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leila Harfuch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luciane Chiodi Bachion
    • 1
  • Marcelo Melo Ramalho Moreira
    • 1
  • André Meloni Nassar
    • 1
  • Miguel Carriquiry
    • 2
  1. 1.AgroiconeSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Universidad de la RepúblicaMontevideoUruguay

Personalised recommendations