Skip to main content

Simulation: In Anesthesia for Liver Transplantation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Anesthesia and Perioperative Care for Organ Transplantation

Abstract

Anesthesia management of liver transplantation patients presents unique challenges because of the complexity of the surgery and the pathophysiology of end-stage liver disease. Experience obtained in this simulation course provides learner with the ability to strengthen their medical knowledge, improve both clinical skills and confidence while reducing anxiety. It promotes both critical thinking and problem solving helping a learner to evolve from resident to consultant level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ALT:

Anesthesia for liver transplantation

ESLD:

End-stage liver disease

LTx:

Liver transplantation

OR:

Operating room

TEG:

Thromboelastogram

References

  1. Domuracki KJ, Moule CJ, Owens H, Kostandoff G, Plummer JL. Learning on a simulator does transfer to clinical practice. Resuscitation. 2009;80:346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Okuda Y, Bryson EO, Demaria S, Jacobson L, et al. The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence? Mount Sinai J Med. 2009;76:330–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Steadman RH, Coates WC, Huang YM, et al. Simulation based training is superior to problem based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lake F. Teaching in clinical setting. In: Riley RH, editor. Manual of simulation in health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 125–37.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aggarwal S, Bane BC, Boucek CD, Planinsic RM, Lutz JW, Metro DG. Simulation: a teaching tool for liver transplantation anesthesiology. Clin Transplant. 2012;26:564–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaba DM, Fish KJ, Howard SK. Crisis management in anesthesiology. New York: Churchill Livingston; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levine AI, Swartz MH. Standardized patients: “the other” simulation. J Crit Care. 2008;23:179–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morrison J. ABC of teaching and learning in medicine. BMJ. 2003; 326:385–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chow RE, Naik VN. Realism and the art of simulation. In: Murray WB, Kyle RR, editors. Clinical simulation. Burlington, MA: Elsevier; 2008. p. 89–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakai T, Planinsic RM, Hilmi IA, Marsh JW. Complications associated with percutaneous placement of venous return cannula for venovenous bypass in adult orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:961–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Britt RC, Novosel TJ, Britt LD, Sullivan M. The impact of central line simulation before the ICU experience. Am J Surg. 2009;197:533–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaba DM. Simulations that are challenging to the psyche of participants how much should we worry and about what? Simul Healthc. 2013;8:4–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Husebo SE, Diekmann P, Rystedt H, Soreide E, Friberg F. The relationship between facilitators’ questions and the level of reflection postsimulation debreifing. Simul Healthc. 2013;8:135–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Decker S. Integrating guided reflection into simulated learning experiences. In: Jeffries PR, editor. Simulation in nursing education from conceptualization to evaluation. New York, NY: National League for Nursing; 2007. p. 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dreifuerst KT. The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: a concept analysis. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009;30:109–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cantrell MA. The importance of debriefing in clinical simulations. Clin Simul Nurs. 2008;3:19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Phrampus P, O’Donnell JM. Debriefing using a structured and supported approach. In: Levine AI et al., editors. The comprehensive textbook of healthcare simulation. New York: Springer Science Business Media; 2013. p. 73–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Donnell JM, Rodgers D, Lee W, et al. Structured and supported debriefing (interactive multimedia program). Dallas: American Heart Association; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shushma Aggarwal M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aggarwal, S., Boucek, C.D., Damian, D. (2017). Simulation: In Anesthesia for Liver Transplantation. In: Subramaniam, K., Sakai, T. (eds) Anesthesia and Perioperative Care for Organ Transplantation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6377-5_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6377-5_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6375-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6377-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics