Abstract
Synapse formation is a unique biological phenomenon. The molecular biological perspective of this phenomenon is different from the fractal geometrical one. However, those perspectives are not mutually exclusive and supplement each other. A cornerstone of the first one is a chain of biochemical reactions with the Markov property, that is, a deterministic, conditional, memoryless process ordered in time and in space, in which the consecutive stages are determined by expression of some regulatory proteins. The coordination of molecular and cellular events leading to the synapse formation occurs in fractal time-space, that is, the time-space that is not only the arena of events but also influences those events actively. That time-space emerges owing to coupling of time and space through nonlinear dynamics. The process of synapse formation possesses fractal dynamics with non-Gaussian distribution of probability and a reduced number of molecular Markov chains ready for transfer of biologically relevant information.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aguayo LG, van Zundert B, Tapia JC, Carrasco MA, Alvarez FJ. Changes on the properties of glycine receptors during neuronal development. Brain Res Rev. 2004;47(1–3):33–45.
Briones TL, Klintsova AY, Greenough WT. Stability of synaptic plasticity in the adult rat visual cortex induced by complex environment exposure. Brain Res. 2004;1018(1):130–5.
Bury LA, Sabo SL. Building a terminal: mechanisms of presynaptic development in the CNS. Neuroscientist. 2016;22(4):372–91.
Ethell IM, Ethell DW. Matrix metalloproteinases in brain development and remodeling: synaptic functions and targets. J Neurosci Res. 2007;85(13):2813–23.
Freeman MR. Glial control of synaptogenesis. Cell. 2005;120(3):292–3.
Gerstein GL, Mandelbrot B. Random walk models for the spike activity of a single neuron. Biophys J. 1964;4:41–68.
Guan C, Chien-Ping K. Schwann cell-derived factors modulate synaptic activities at developing neuromuscular synapses. J Neurosci. 2007;27(25):6712–22.
Hu J, Zheng Y, Gao J. Long-range temporal correlations, multifractality, and the causal relation between neural inputs and movements. Frontiers Neurol. 2013;4(158):1–11.
Kacerovsky JB, Murai KK. Stargazing: monitoring subcellular dynamics of brain astrocytes. J Neurosci. 2015;323:84–95.
Karperien A, Jelinek HF, Milosevic NT. Reviewing lacunarity analysis and classification of microglia in neuroscience. In: Waliszewski P, editor. Fractals and complexity. Wroclaw: Format; 2013. p. 50–5.
Proepper C, Johannsen S, Liebau S, Dahl J, Vaida B, Bockmann J, Kreutz MR, Gundelfinger ED, Boeckers TM. Abelson interacting protein 1 (Abi-1) is essential for dendrite morphogenesis and synapse formation. EMBO J. 2007;26(5):1397–409.
Sanes JR, Lichtman JW. Development of the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:389–442.
Suzuki S, Kiyosue K, Hazama S, Ogura A, Kashihara M, Hara T, Koshimizu H, Kojima M. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor regulates cholesterol metabolism for synapse development. J Neurosci. 2007;27(24):6417–27.
Toni N, Teng EM, Bushong EA, Aimone JB, Zhao C, Consiglio A, van Praag H, Martone ME, Ellisman MH, Gage FH. Synapse formation on neurons born in the adult hippocampus. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10(6):727–34.
Ullian EM, Christopherson KS, Barres BA. Role for glia in synaptogenesis. Glia. 2004;47(3):209–16.
Waliszewski P, Konarski J. Neuronal differentiation and synapse formation occur in space and time with fractal dimension. Synapse. 2002;43(4):252–8.
Waliszewski P. A principle of fractal-stochastic dualism and Gompertzian dynamics of growth and self-organization. Biosystems. 2005;82(1):61–73.
Waliszewski P, Konarski J. On time-space of nonlinear phenomena with Gompertzian dynamics. Biosystems. 2005;80:91–7.
Waliszewski P. A principle of fractal-stochastic dualism, couplings, complementarity and growth. Contr Eng Appl Informatics. 2009;11(4):45–52.
Zeng X, Sun M, Liu L, Chen F, Wei L, Xie W. Neurexin-1 is required for synapse formation and larvae associative learning in Drosophila. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(13):2509–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
If one assumes that the spatial variable x and the temporal variable t are coupled to each other in a linear manner into a single, complex spatiotemporal variable θ
then the Gompertz function, the function of probability distribution P(θ), the anharmonic potential U(θ), and the diffusion coefficient D are related each other through the one-dimensional differential operator (8.2). This operator contains the function of probability distribution [19]:
This linear coupling of variables can also be defined as a function with both spatial and temporal fractal dimension. It is known from experimental data from the in vitro cellular system of P19/RAC 65 that the number of cells (or their volume) also changes in time t according to the Gompertz function f(t) [17]. A volume of the spheroid V is given by equation:
in which V k is a mean volume of a single cell, n stands for a number of cells in the spheroid, and the Gompertz function can be fitted with the fractal function f(t) = at b with very high accuracy, a coefficient of nonlinear regression R >> 0.95 for n ≥ 100 pairs of coordinates, in which a stands for a scaling coefficient, b t is a temporal fractal dimension, and t is scalar time.
The volume V of the spheroid can also be expressed as a function of scalar geometrical variable x (i.e., a radius of a family of the concentric spheres covering the entire spheroid) by Eq. (8.4):
in which a 1 stands for a scaling coefficient, b s is a spatial fractal dimension after scalar time t 1, and x is a scalar, geometrical variable, which locates an effect in space.
Hence, we get Eq. (8.5):
in which a, a 0, and a 1 stand for the scaling coefficients, b t is the temporal fractal dimension, b s0 and b s are the spatial fractal dimensions after time t 0 and t, respectively, and x is a geometrical variable.
Finally, Eq. (8.6) relates space and time in which proliferation, differentiation, and synapse formation occurs. This equation defines the geometrical variable x as a function of the scalar time t and both temporal and spatial fractal dimension:
in which t stands for scalar time, x is geometrical variable, b s is the spatial fractal dimension, and b t is the temporal fractal dimension.
1.1 Entropy and Dynamics of Synapse Formation in Fractal Time-Space
It is worth to notice that the assumed Markov model of molecular interactions within differentiating neurons implies at least three important consequences. First, entropy (i.e., missing information) H M of such the Markov chain of the coupled molecular reactions is always lower than entropy of the set of random and independent biochemical reactions H R . Indeed, entropy is defined as the expected value of missing information H p :
in which p = (p 1,p 2,…p j ), jε N, is a probability density function over a generic variable X, and if p j = 0, then H p = 0, log is a natural logarithm, providing a unit of measure.
Hence, the conditional entropy H(X k |Y k−1) of the X k reaction stands for which conditional information is determined when the state Y k−1 = i is given by the following equation:
The conditional entropy of the Markov chain H C is given by (8.9):
Finally, we get Eq. (8.10) for the n first steps of the Markov chain X 1, X 2,…, X n from (8.7), (8.8), and (8.9), the principle of additivity of independent random events, and from the analog principle for the conditional probabilities:
Second, Gompertz dynamics of molecular cellular growth can be normalized, i.e., growth dynamics of various tissue systems can be described by a single normalized Gompertz function f N (t) (8.11). In fact, this normalized Gompertz function is both a dynamics function f N (t) and a probability function p N (t) (see for details [17]):
Consider a coupling of probability function p N (t) and antiprobability function −log p N (t), in which r = b:
This equation defines a relationship between entropy H(t) and the normalized Gompertz dynamics of growth p N (t):
Finally, from (8.11) and (8.12), we get (8.14):
According to Shannon theorem, of all the continuous distribution densities for which the standard deviation exists and is fixed, the Gaussian (i.e., normal) distribution has the maximum value of entropy H:
In the case of growing supramolecular cellular system such as neuron, entropy, or missing information, H(t) is a function of time related with dynamic function of growth in fractal space-time. For b = 1 both the normalized Gompertz function (8.11) and the entropy function (8.14) overlap each other. However, b<<1 for the majority of cellular systems. The distribution of probability is in those cases non-Gaussian.
Third, there is a relationship between the number of elements in the Markov chain and entropy. If M p (n) stands for a number of the Markov chains of the length n with the total probability p, 0<p<1, there exists the same limit for each probability p that equals entropy H:
If a total number of states of the supramolecular cellular system equal 2m, then the number of molecular reactions interconnected in the Markov chains of the length n is 2nm. It is clear from (8.16) that only 2nH molecular Markov chains with probability 1−ε, ε>0 will be involved in transfer of biologically relevant information.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kołodziej, M., Waliszewski, P. (2016). Neuronal Fractal Dynamics. In: Di Ieva, A. (eds) The Fractal Geometry of the Brain. Springer Series in Computational Neuroscience. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3995-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3995-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3993-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3995-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)