Quest for Equation of Life: Scientific Constraints on How We Spend Our Time
How much time do you spend on each activity today? This is one of the central issues of optimization in a broad spectrum of services and personal activities. However, conventionally, the time allocation and prioritization have been out of the scope of science, but a matter of managerial or personal decision making.
This chapter, based on longitudinal measurement of human dynamics, denies this and uncovers that the time for any activity is constrained by the thermodynamics-based upper limit. The derived formula, the same form as that for Carnot efficiency of a heat engine based on the entropy-maximizing principle, is found to be governing the daily human activity process. This physics-based understanding of human time-allocation changes the framework of optimization in any activities and also provides novel principle for better productivity, e.g., through balanced motion-bandwidth utilization, in service, work, education, and life.
KeywordsService science Knowledge worker Productivity Time usage Energy Entropy Thermodynamic law Acceleration Activity Sensor
I would like to thank K. Kawamoto, T. Tanaka, K. Aiki, H. Kuriyama for measurement, N. Masuda, H. Kubota, N. Sato and A. Sato for discussion and comments, T. Akitomi, J. Watanabe, K. Ara, H. Takeda for suggestions on modeling. Anonymous statistical data were obtained with written consent having policy for information handling and ethics.
- Ara K et al (2008) Sensible organization: changing our business and work styles through sensor data. IPSJ J 49:1625–1636Google Scholar
- Ara K et al (2009) Predicting flow state in daily work through continuous sensing of motion rhythm. In: INSS’09: Proceedings of the 6th International conference on networked sensing systems, pp 145–150Google Scholar
- Barabasi AL (2010) Bursts. Dutton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Bruns WJ, Kaplan RS (1987) Accounting and management: a field study perspective. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Cattuto C, Van den Broeck W, Barrat A, Colizza V, Pinton J-F, Vespignani A (2010) Dynamics of person-to-person interactions from distributed RFID sensor networks. PLoS One 5(7):e11596Google Scholar
- Covey SR (1989) The 7 habits of highly effective people. Fireside, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Drucker PF (1966) The effective executive. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Drucker PF (1999) Management challenges for the 21st century. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hilty C (1891) Happiness (Glück)Google Scholar
- Memoto (2012) Web site. http://memoto.com/
- Palmisano SJ (2008) A smarter planet: the next leadership agenda. IBM. November 6. http://www.rochestermnchamber.com/images/ASmarterPlanet-TheNextLeadershipAgenda.pdf
- Rosenkrantz RD (ed) (1983) E. T. Jaynes: papers on probability, statistics and statistical physics. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Roy D (2009) New horizons in the study of child language acquisition. In: Proceedings of INTERSPEECH-2009, Brighton, England, 6–10 September 2009Google Scholar
- Schrödinger E (1946) Statistical thermodynamics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka T, Yamashita S, Aiki K, Kuriyama H, Yano K (2008) Life microscope: continuous daily-activity recording system with tiny wireless sensor, 5th International conference on networked sensing systems, pp 162–165Google Scholar
- Waber A, Olguin D, Kim T, Mohan A, Ara K, Pentland A (2007) Organizational engineering using sociometric badges. In: Proceedings of NetSci: International conference on network science, 20–25 May 2007Google Scholar
- Yamashita S et al (2006) A 15 × 15 mm, 1 μA, reliable sensor-net module: enabling application-specific nodes. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp 383–390Google Scholar
- Yano K, Ara K, Moriwaki N, Kuriyama H (2009) Measurement of human behavior: creating a society for discovering opportunities. Hitachi Rev 58(4):139–144Google Scholar