Advertisement

Quest for Equation of Life: Scientific Constraints on How We Spend Our Time

  • Kazuo YanoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy book series (SSRI)

Abstract

How much time do you spend on each activity today? This is one of the central issues of optimization in a broad spectrum of services and personal activities. However, conventionally, the time allocation and prioritization have been out of the scope of science, but a matter of managerial or personal decision making.

This chapter, based on longitudinal measurement of human dynamics, denies this and uncovers that the time for any activity is constrained by the thermodynamics-based upper limit. The derived formula, the same form as that for Carnot efficiency of a heat engine based on the entropy-maximizing principle, is found to be governing the daily human activity process. This physics-based understanding of human time-allocation changes the framework of optimization in any activities and also provides novel principle for better productivity, e.g., through balanced motion-bandwidth utilization, in service, work, education, and life.

Keywords

Service science Knowledge worker Productivity Time usage Energy Entropy Thermodynamic law Acceleration Activity Sensor 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank K. Kawamoto, T. Tanaka, K. Aiki, H. Kuriyama for measurement, N. Masuda, H. Kubota, N. Sato and A. Sato for discussion and comments, T. Akitomi, J. Watanabe, K. Ara, H. Takeda for suggestions on modeling. Anonymous statistical data were obtained with written consent having policy for information handling and ethics.

References

  1. Ara K et al (2008) Sensible organization: changing our business and work styles through sensor data. IPSJ J 49:1625–1636Google Scholar
  2. Ara K et al (2009) Predicting flow state in daily work through continuous sensing of motion rhythm. In: INSS’09: Proceedings of the 6th International conference on networked sensing systems, pp 145–150Google Scholar
  3. Barabasi AL (2005) The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature 435:207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barabasi AL (2010) Bursts. Dutton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Barthelemy M (2011) Spatial network. Phys Rep 499:1–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruns WJ, Kaplan RS (1987) Accounting and management: a field study perspective. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  7. Cattuto C, Van den Broeck W, Barrat A, Colizza V, Pinton J-F, Vespignani A (2010) Dynamics of person-to-person interactions from distributed RFID sensor networks. PLoS One 5(7):e11596Google Scholar
  8. Covey SR (1989) The 7 habits of highly effective people. Fireside, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Drucker PF (1966) The effective executive. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Drucker PF (1999) Management challenges for the 21st century. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Eagle N, Pentland A (2006) Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Pers Ubiquit Comput 10:255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freund LE, Spohrer JC (2012) The human side of service engineering. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 23(1):2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Georgescu-Roegen N (1971) The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gonzalez MC, Lind PG, Herrmann HJ (2006) System of mobile agents to model social networks. Phys Rev Lett 96:088702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez MC, Hidalgo CA, Barabasi AL (2008) Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453:779–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haken H (1978) Synergetics: an introduction nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry and biology. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hilty C (1891) Happiness (Glück)Google Scholar
  18. Lyubomirsky S, Sheldon KM, Schkade D (2005) Pursuing happiness: the architecture of sustainable change. Rev Gen Psychol 9(2):111–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Memoto (2012) Web site. http://memoto.com/
  20. Nakamura T et al (2007) Universal scaling law in human behavioral organization. Phys Rev Lett 99(13):138103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakamura T et al (2008) Of mice and men—universality and breakdown of behavioral organizations. PLoS ONE 3(4):e2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Palmisano SJ (2008) A smarter planet: the next leadership agenda. IBM. November 6. http://www.rochestermnchamber.com/images/ASmarterPlanet-TheNextLeadershipAgenda.pdf
  23. Pentland A, Choudhury T, Eagle N, Singh P (2005) Human dynamics: computation for organizations. Pattern Recogn Lett 26:503–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenkrantz RD (ed) (1983) E. T. Jaynes: papers on probability, statistics and statistical physics. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  25. Roy D (2009) New horizons in the study of child language acquisition. In: Proceedings of INTERSPEECH-2009, Brighton, England, 6–10 September 2009Google Scholar
  26. Schrödinger E (1946) Statistical thermodynamics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Song C, Qu Z, Blumm N, Barabasi AL (2010) Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science 327:1018–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tanaka T, Yamashita S, Aiki K, Kuriyama H, Yano K (2008) Life microscope: continuous daily-activity recording system with tiny wireless sensor, 5th International conference on networked sensing systems, pp 162–165Google Scholar
  29. Vazquez A et al (2006) Modeling bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Phys Rev E 73:036127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waber A, Olguin D, Kim T, Mohan A, Ara K, Pentland A (2007) Organizational engineering using sociometric badges. In: Proceedings of NetSci: International conference on network science, 20–25 May 2007Google Scholar
  31. Watanabe J, Akitomi T, Ara K, Yano K (2011) Antiferromagnetic character of workplace stress. Phys Rev E 84:017101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yamashita S et al (2006) A 15 × 15 mm, 1 μA, reliable sensor-net module: enabling application-specific nodes. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp 383–390Google Scholar
  33. Yano K (2013) The science of human interaction and the teaching. Mind Brain Educ 7(1):19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yano K, Ara K, Moriwaki N, Kuriyama H (2009) Measurement of human behavior: creating a society for discovering opportunities. Hitachi Rev 58(4):139–144Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research and Development Group, Hitachi Ltd.KokubunjiJapan

Personalised recommendations