Advertisement

Agent-Based Simulation for Service Science

  • Hideyuki MizutaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy book series (SSRI)

Abstract

The most important building blocks of service systems are human beings. Because of the dynamic and heterogeneous interactions among human beings with their bounded rationality, a service system is recognized as a complex adaptive system to which quantitative scientific analysis is difficult to apply. In this chapter, we discuss a computational approach for such complex adaptive systems called agent-based simulation. Since the 1990s, agent-based simulation has gained significance as a tool to reproduce complex stock market interactions by modeling human traders as software agents. Computer scientists and social scientists are working together to model social systems with interacting heterogeneous agents and simulating their dynamic behaviors using computers. As our computational resources continue to grow rapidly, the application areas for agent-based simulations are spreading into areas of social science that overlap with SSME research. We will introduce several examples of agent-based simulations for marketing, for emissions trading, for communications, and for traffic systems and discuss the contributions of this scientific approach to the study of service systems.

Keywords

Complex Adaptive System Marginal Abatement Cost Online Auction Double Auction Traffic Simulator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arthur WB, Durlauf SN, Lane DA (1997) The economy as an Evolving Complex System II. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  2. Barabasi AL (2001) Linked: the new science of networks. Perseus, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonabeau E (1999) Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Carley K, Krackhardt D (1998) A PCANS model of structure in organizations. In: Proceedings of the 1998 International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology, Monterey, JuneGoogle Scholar
  5. Epstein JM, Axtell R (1994) Growing artificial societies. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Grütter JM (2000) World Market for GHG Emission Reductions, the World Bank’s National AIJ/JI/CDM Strategy Studies Program, 2000Google Scholar
  7. Iba T, Takabe Y, Chubachi Y, Tanaka J, Kamihashi K, Tsuya R, Kitano S, Kitano S, Hirokane M, Matsuzawa Y, Matsuzawa Y (2001) Boxed economy foundation model: toward simulation platform for agent-based economic simulations. In: Terano T et al (eds) New frontiers in artificial intelligence. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Izumi K (1998) An artificial market model of a foreign exchange market. Ph.D. Thesis, University of TokyoGoogle Scholar
  9. Kato S, Yamamoto G, Mizuta H, Tai H (2008) Simulating whole city traffic with millions of multiple vehicle agents. IBM Research Report RT0759Google Scholar
  10. Lange DB, Oshima M (1998) Programming and deploying Java mobile agents with aglets. Addison Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  11. Mantegna RN, Stanley HE (2000) An introduction to econophysics: correlations and complexity in finance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Milgram S (1967) The small-world problem. Psychol Today 2:60–67Google Scholar
  13. Mizuta H, Nakamura F (2005) Agent-based simulation of enterprise communication network. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB, Joines JA (eds) Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, pp 2590–2594Google Scholar
  14. Mizuta H, Steiglitz K (2000) Agent-based simulation of dynamic online auctions. In: Joines JA, Barton RR, Kang K, Fishwick PA (eds) Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, pp 1772–1777Google Scholar
  15. Mizuta H, Yamagata Y (2001a) Agent-based simulation for economic and environmental studies. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (LNAI), vol 2253. Springer, pp 142–152Google Scholar
  16. Mizuta H, Yamagata Y (2001b) Agent-based simulation and greenhouse gas emissions trading. In: Peters BA, Smith JS, Medeiros DJ, Rohrer MW (eds) Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, pp 535–540Google Scholar
  17. Mizuta H, Yamagata Y (2002) Transaction cycle of agents and web-based gaming simulation for international emissions trading. In: Yucesan E, Chen CH, Snowdon JL, Charnes JM (eds) Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, pp 801–806Google Scholar
  18. Mizuta H, Yamagata Y (2005) Gaming simulation of the international CO2 emission trading under the Kyoto protocol. In: Agent-based simulation: Postproceedings of AESCS’04, Springer, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  19. Mizuta H, Steiglitz K, Lirov E (2003) Effects of price signal choices on market stability. J Econ Behav Organ 52(2):235–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Namatame A, Terano T, Kurumatani K (2002) Agent-based approaches in economic and social complex systems. IOS Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  21. Oguchi T, Katakura M (2000) New conceptual evaluation method of amount of exhaust emission gas on vehicular road traffic. Transport 6:383–392Google Scholar
  22. SOARS (2012) SOARS Project. http://www.soars.jp/en/. Accessed 29 Apr 2012
  23. Spohrer JC, Maglio PP (2010) Toward a science of service systems: value and symbols. In: Maglio PP, Kieliszewski CA, Spohrer JC (eds) Handbook of service science. Springer, New York, pp 157–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Steiglitz K, Shapiro D (1998) Simulating the madness of crowds: price bubbles in an auction-mediated robot market. Comput Economics 12:35–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Suzumura T, Kato S, Imamichi T, Takeuchi M, Kanezashi H, Ide T, Onodera T (2012) X10-based massive parallel large-scale traffic flow simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGPLAN X10 Workshop (X10’12). ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Watts DJ (1999) Small worlds—the dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  27. Yamagata Y, Seya H, Bagan H (2010) Evaluation of fractional green vegetation cover in residential area. In: Proceedings of the ISPRS the Commission VIII Symposium, Kyoto, Japan, 9–12 August 2010Google Scholar
  28. Yamamoto G, Hideki T, Mizuta H (2006) A platform for massive agent-based simulation and its evaluation. MMAS/LSMAS/CCMMS 2006, pp 1–12Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IBM JapanTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations