Abstract
The application of laparoscopy to renal surgery has revolutionized the way localized renal cell carcinoma is treated by urologic surgeons. Open approaches such as flank and thoracoabdominal incisions are associated with greater pain, morbidity, and a longer convalescence for patients. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has now become the gold standard since Dr. Clayman described the first case in 1991. However, the procedure still involves multiple small incisions for laparoscopic ports, as well as a larger incision for specimen extraction. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) eliminates the need for this and has been associated with better cosmesis and lower postoperative pain. However, the procedure can be technically challenging given the need to cross instruments to achieve triangulation during the dissection. The application of robotic surgery to LESS has overcome some of these constraints, making the surgery easier to perform. However, because the current robotic platform is not specifically designed for LESS, issues with instrument clashing and reduced operative space remain. The application of new LESS-specific robotic platforms has been developed and may eliminate some of these issues going forward.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Stein RJ. Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report. BJU Int. 2008;103:366–9.
Stein RJ, White WM, Goel RK, Irwin BH, Haber GP, Kaouk JH. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using GelPort as the access platform. Eur Urol. 2010;57:132–7.
White MA, Autorino R, Spana G, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy: surgical technique and comparative outcomes. Eur Urol. 2011;59:815–22.
White MA, Haber G-P, Autorino R, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy: technique and early outcomes. Eur Urol. 2010;58:544–50.
Arkoncel FR, Lee JW, Rha KH, Han WK, Jeoung HB, Oh CK. Two-port robot-assisted vs standard robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison. Urology. 2011;78:581–5.
Olweny EO, Park SK, Tan YK, Gurbuz C, Cadeddu JA, Best SL. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty. Eur Urol. 2012;61:410–4.
Joseph RA, Goh AC, Cuevas SP, et al. Chopstick surgery: a novel technique improves surgeon performance and eliminates arm collision in robotic single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1331–5.
Haber GP, White MA, Autorino R, et al. Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Urology. 2010;76:1279–82.
White MA, Autorino R, Spana G, Hillyer S, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH. Robotic laparoendoscopic single site urological surgery: analysis of 50 consecutive cases. J Urol. 2012;187:1696–701.
Lee JW, Arkoncel FRP, Rha KH, et al. Urologic robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using a homemade single-port device:a single-center experience of 68 cases. J Endourol. 2011;25:1481–5.
Fareed K, Zaytoun OM, Autorino R, et al. Robotic single port suprapubic transvesical enucleation of the prostate (R-STEP): initial experience. BJU Int. 2012;110(5):732–7.
Fan X, Lin T, Xu K, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2012;62:601–12.
Autorino R, Kaouk JH, Stolzenburg J, et al. Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2013;63:266–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Samarasekera, D., Kaouk, J.H. (2017). Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Radical Nephrectomy. In: Kaouk, J., Stein, R., Haber, GP. (eds) Atlas of Laparoscopic and Robotic Single Site Surgery. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3575-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3575-8_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3573-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3575-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)