Abstract
In this chapter, we use key analytical concepts from the justice research literature, such as entitlement, relative deprivation, restorative and procedural justice, to analyze the history of gay and lesbian rights in the United States. We argue that social movements, such as the civil rights movement and the feminist movement inspired the gay and lesbian liberation movement. This movement effectively functioned to change a sense of entitlement among gays and lesbians, from seeing their sexuality as an illness to framing it in liberatory terms. The 1980s governmental neglect of the AIDS epidemic and the lesbian baby boom increased a sense of relative deprivation among same-sex couples in comparison to straight couples. This led to a campaign to legitimize same-sex marriage. The victory of same-sex marriage rights in the United States was based on two types of justifications endorsed by people with different positions on the political map. Judges and people with libertarian orientation justified same-sex marriage based on procedural justice reasoning (government should not police marriage). On the other hand, judges and people with liberal orientation justified same-sex marriage based on restorative justice reasoning (marriage is a human right). Our analysis shows the utility of concepts from the justice research paradigm in explaining the dramatic shift in support for gay and lesbian rights in the United States.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Agigian, A. (2004). Baby steps: How lesbian insemination is changing the world. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
Baunach, D. M. (2012). Changing same-sex marriage attitudes in America from 1988 through 2010. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 364–378. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs022.
Bayer, R., & Oppenheimer, G. M. (2000). AIDS doctors: voices from the epidemic. London, England: Oxford University Press.
Ben Hagai, E., Clark, N., Zurbrrigen, E. L. (under review). Individuals’ rejection of compulsory heterosexuality and the battle for same-sex Marriage. Feminism & Psychology.
Chauncey, G. (2004). Why marriage? The history shaping today’s debate over gay equality. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Clarkson-Freeman, P. A. (2005). The defense of marriage act (DOMA): Its impact on those seeking same-sex marriages. Journal of Homosexuality, 48(2), 1–19.
Crosby, F. J., Pufall, A., Snyder, R. C., O’Connell, M., & Whalen, P. (1989). The denial of personal disadvantage among you, me, and all the other ostriches. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought. Psychological perspectives (pp. 79–99). New York, NY: Springer.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 132–149.
Dupuis, M. (2002). Same-sex marriage, legal mobilization, and the politics of rights. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Gaines, N., & Garand, J. (2010). Morality, equality, or locality: Analyzing the determinants of support for same-sex marriage. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 553–567.
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). (2010). Gay men a living history. Washington, DC. Retrieved November 8, 2013, from http://hab.hrsa.gov/livinghistory/issues/gaymen_1.htm
Johnson, D. K. (2009). The lavender scare: The cold war persecution of gays and lesbians in the federal government. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kerns, J., & Fine, M. (1994). The relation between gender and negative attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: Do gender role attitudes mediate this relation? Sex Roles, 31, 297–307.
Kite, M., & Whitley, B. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(4), 336–353.
Klarman, M. J. (2012). From the closet to the altar: Courts, backlash, and the struggle for same-sex marriage. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Levy, A. (2013, September 30). The perfect wife. New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/09/30/130930fa_fact_levy
Liptak, A. (2013, June 26). Supreme Court bolsters gay marriage with two major rulings. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes. com/2013/06/27/us/politics/supreme-court-gay-marriage.html?pagewanted = all.
Mezey, N. J. (2008). New choices, new families: How lesbians decide about motherhood. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Patterson, C. J. (1994). Lesbian and gay couples considering parenthood: An agenda for research, service, and advocacy. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 1(2), 33–55.
Pfister, J., & Schnog, N. (Eds.). (1997). Inventing the psychological: Toward a cultural history of emotional life in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Prentice, D., & Crosby, F. (1987). The importance of context for assessing deservingness. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice and relative deprivation. Theoretical, empirical, and policy perspectives (pp. 165–182). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sandel, M. J. (2009). Justice: What’s the right thing to do? New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Sherkat, D. E., Powell-Williams, M., Maddox, G., & De Vries, K. M. (2011). Religion, politics, and support for same-sex marriage in the United States, 1988–2008. Social Science Research, 40, 167–180.
Silver, N. (2013, March 26). How opinion on same-sex marriage is changing, and what it means. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/26/how-opinion-on-same-sex-marriage-is-changing-and-what-it-means/
Skitka, L. J., & Crosby, F. J. (2003). Trends in the social psychological study of justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 282–285.
Stewart, C. (2003). Gay and lesbian issues: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Tong, L. (1997). Comparing mixed-race and same-sex marriage. In R. P. Cabaj & D. W. Purcell (Eds.), On the road to same-sex marriage: A supportive guide to psychological, political, and legal issues (pp. 109–127). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
(2013). United States v. Windsor, 133 U.S. 2675, 2692.
Viefhues-Bailey, L. H. (2010). Between a man and a woman?: Why conservatives oppose same-sex marriage. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ben Hagai, E., Crosby, F.J. (2016). Between Relative Deprivation and Entitlement: An Historical Analysis of the Battle for Same-Sex Marriage in the United States. In: Sabbagh, C., Schmitt, M. (eds) Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_26
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3215-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3216-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)