Skip to main content

Approach to Endoscopic Adverse Events

  • Chapter
  • 934 Accesses

Abstract

The applications and benefits of gastrointestinal endoscopy have increased enormously, but so too have the potential for adverse events. It is critical for the endoscopist to have a thorough understanding of the potential adverse events of any given endoscopic procedure. Optimal prevention and management requires attention to several elements, including a thorough preprocedural evaluation, careful discussion with the patient and family of the proposed procedure and its risks and benefits, efforts to limit risks, and timely recognition and appropriate management of adverse events. Herein, we outline management algorithms with regard to the more common adverse events in endoscopy: pain, bleeding, and perforation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(3):446–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leffler DA, Kheraj R, Garud S, Neeman N, Nathanson LA, Kelly CP, et al. The incidence and cost of unexpected hospital use after scheduled outpatient endoscopy. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(19):1752–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu J, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2012;44(2):128–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dellon ES, Hawk JS, Grimm IS, Shaheen NJ. The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(4):843–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang WL, Wu ZH, Sun Q, Wei JF, Chen XF, Zhou DK, et al. Meta-analysis: the use of carbon dioxide insufflation vs. room air insufflation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35(10):1145–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bassan MS, Holt B, Moss A, Williams SJ, Sonson R, Bourke MJ. Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces number of postprocedure admissions after endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions: a prospective cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(1):90–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kowalczyk L, Forsmark CE, Ben-David K, Wagh MS, Chauhan S, Collins D, et al. Algorithm for the management of endoscopic perforations: a quality improvement project. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(6):1022–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee CT, Huang SP, Cheng TY, Chiang TH, Tai CM, Su WC, et al. Factors associated with myocardial infarction after emergency endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in high-risk patients: a prospective observational study. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25(1):49–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas SH, Silen W, Cheema F, Reisner A, Aman S, Goldstein JN, et al. Effects of morphine analgesia on diagnostic accuracy in Emergency Department patients with abdominal pain: a prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196(1):18–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zissin R, Osadchy A, Gayer G. Abdominal CT findings in small bowel perforation. Br J Radiol. 2009;82(974):162–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lohsiriwat V. Colonoscopic perforation: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(4):425–30.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kapetanos D, Beltsis A, Chatzimavroudis G, Katsinelos P. Postpolypectomy bleeding: incidence, risk factors, prevention, and management. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22(2):102–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sawhney MS, Salfiti N, Nelson DB, Lederle FA, Bond JH. Risk factors for severe delayed postpolypectomy bleeding. Endoscopy. 2008;40(2):115–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Witt DM, Delate T, McCool KH, Dowd MB, Clark NP, Crowther MA, et al. Incidence and predictors of bleeding or thrombosis after polypectomy in patients receiving and not receiving anticoagulation therapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7(12):1982–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Metz AJ, Bourke MJ, Moss A, Williams SJ, Swan MP, Byth K. Factors that predict bleeding following endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic lesions. Endoscopy. 2011;43(6):506–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baillie J. Postpolypectomy bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(6):1151–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Afdhal NH, Giannini EG, Tayyab G, Mohsin A, Lee JW, Andriulli A, et al. Eltrombopag before procedures in patients with cirrhosis and thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(8):716–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson MA, Ben-Menachem T, Gan SI, Appalaneni V, Banerjee S, Cash BD, et al. Management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70(6):1060–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liaquat H, Rohn E, Rex DK. Prophylactic clip closure reduced the risk of delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage: experience in 277 clipped large sessile or flat colorectal lesions and 247 control lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(3):401–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pfaffenbach B, Adamek RJ, Wegener M. Endoscopic band ligation for treatment of post-polypectomy bleeding. Z Gastroenterol. 1996;34(4):241–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith RE, Doull J. Treatment of colonic post-polypectomy bleeding site by endoscopic band ligation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40(4):499–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Slivka A, Parsons WG, Carr-Locke DL. Endoscopic band ligation for treatment of post-polypectomy hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40(2 Pt 1):230–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leung JW, Chan FK, Sung JJ, Chung S. Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced hemorrhage: a study of risk factors and the role of epinephrine injection. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42(6):550–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson DB, Freeman ML. Major hemorrhage from endoscopic sphincterotomy: risk factor analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1994;19(4):283–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(13):909–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(6 Suppl):S273–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Akiho H, Sumida Y, Akahoshi K, Murata A, Ouchi J, Motomura Y, et al. Safety advantage of endocut mode over endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(13):2086–8.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Feng Y, Zhu H, Chen X, Xu S, Cheng W, Ni J, et al. Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47(6):655–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang XM, Hu B, Pan YM, Gao DJ, Wang TT, Wu J, et al. Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation following limited sphincterotomy for the removal of refractory bile duct stones: experience of 169 cases in a single Chinese center. J Dig Dis. 2013;14(3):125–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Attasaranya S, Cheon YK, Vittal H, Howell DA, Wakelin DE, Cunningham JT, et al. Large-diameter biliary orifice balloon dilation to aid in endoscopic bile duct stone removal: a multicenter series. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(7):1046–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Draganov PV, Evans W, Fazel A, Forsmark CE. Large size balloon dilation of the ampulla after biliary sphincterotomy can facilitate endoscopic extraction of difficult bile duct stones. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43(8):782–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J, Chatzimavroudis G, Zavos C, Terzoudis S, et al. Partially covered vs. uncovered sphincterotome and post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(40):5077–83.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Matsushita M, Takakuwa H, Shimeno N, Uchida K, Nishio A, Okazaki K. Prophylactic injection of hypertonic saline-epinephrine oral to the papilla for prevention of postsphincterotomy bleeding. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44(8):e167–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Paramasivam RK, Angsuwatcharakon P, Soontornmanokul T, Rerknimitr R. Management of endoscopic complications, in particular perforation. Dig Endosc. 2013;25 Suppl 2:132–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Soreide JA, Viste A. Esophageal perforation: diagnostic work-up and clinical decision-making in the first 24 hours. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:66.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bhatia P, Fortin D, Inculet RI, Malthaner RA. Current concepts in the management of esophageal perforations: a twenty-seven year Canadian experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92(1):209–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Panteris V, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ. Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009;41(11):941–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Polydorou A, Vezakis A, Fragulidis G, Katsarelias D, Vagianos C, Polymeneas G. A tailored approach to the management of perforations following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(12):2211–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tettey M, Edwin F, Aniteye E, Sereboe L, Tamatey M, Entsua-Mensah K, et al. Management of intrathoracic oesophageal perforation: analysis of 16 cases. Trop Doct. 2011;41(4):201–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Avgerinos DV, Llaguna OH, Lo AY, Leitman IM. Evolving management of colonoscopic perforations. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(10):1783–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Swan MP, Bourke MJ, Moss A, Williams SJ, Hopper A, Metz A. The target sign: an endoscopic marker for the resection of the muscularis propria and potential perforation during colonic endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(1):79–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Souadka A, Mohsine R, Ifrine L, Belkouchi A, El Malki HO. Acute abdominal compartment syndrome complicating a colonoscopic perforation: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2012;6:51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Raju GS. Gastrointestinal perforations: role of endoscopic closure. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2011;27(5):418–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Trecca A, Gaj F, Gagliardi G. Our experience with endoscopic repair of large colonoscopic perforations and review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol. 2008;12(4):315–21. discussion 22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Weiland T, Fehlker M, Gottwald T, Schurr MO. Performance of the OTSC System in the endoscopic closure of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(7):2258–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. La Torre M, Velluti F, Giuliani G, Di Giulio E, Ziparo V, La Torre F. Promptness of diagnosis is the main prognostic factor after colonoscopic perforation. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(1):e23–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Avgerinos DV, Llaguna OH, Lo AY, Voli J, Leitman IM. Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: related duodenal perforations. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(4):833–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Enns R, Eloubeidi MA, Mergener K, Jowell PS, Branch MS, Pappas TM, et al. ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management. Endoscopy. 2002;34(4):293–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Faylona JM, Qadir A, Chan AC, Lau JY, Chung SC. Small-bowel perforations related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy. Endoscopy. 1999;31(7):546–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stermer E, Levy N. Esophageal perforation during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39(4):603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Stapfer M, Selby RR, Stain SC, Katkhouda N, Parekh D, Jabbour N, et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg. 2000;232(2):191–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Balmadrid B, Kozarek R. Prevention and management of adverse events of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2013;23(2):385–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter V. Draganov M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chavalitdhamrong, D., Summerlee, R.J., Draganov, P.V. (2016). Approach to Endoscopic Adverse Events. In: Wong Kee Song, L., Gorospe, E., Baron, T. (eds) GI Endoscopic Emergencies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3085-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3085-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3084-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3085-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics