Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Curriculum-Based Measurement Fluency Data for Initial Screening Decisions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Fluency Construct

Abstract

This chapter discusses the use of curriculum-based measurement (CBM), especially, CBMs as measures of fluency. The theoretical support for measures of fluency is discussed, along with more detailed research that supports the use of CBM, basic components of the process, and using CBM data to make screening decisions across a variety of academic subjects. Specific details are provided regarding how CBMs have been developed in reading, mathematics, and writing. In addition, case study examples illustrate teachers’ use of CBM in a data-based decision-making process. Issues that might limit the use of CBM for screening decisions are also addressed. The chapter concludes with an overview of future research that is needed in using CBM for screening decisions in a variety of content areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although Calhoon talks specifically of the struggles in mathematics, these concerns must be recognized across content classes at the secondary level.

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardoin, S. P., Christ, T. J., Morena, L. S., Cormier, D. C., & Klingbeil, D. A. (2013). A systematic review and summarization of recommendations and research surrounding Curriculum Based Measurement of Oral Reading Fluency (CBM-R) decision rules. Journal of School Psychology. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.09.04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., & Amtmann, D. (2003). Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 345–363). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., & Fuller, F. (1992). Gender differences in orthographic, verbal, and compositional fluency: Implications for assessing writing disabilities in primary grade children. Journal of School Psychology, 30(4), 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In J. S. Carlson (Series Ed.) & E. C. Butterfield (Vol. Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice, Vol.2: Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 57–81). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Billingsley, F. & Nagy, W. (2001). Processes underlying timing and fluency of reading: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination, and morphological awareness. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 383–414). Timonium: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoon, M. B. (2008). Curriculum-based measurement for mathematics at the high school level. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33(4), 234–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoon, M. B, Emerson, R. W., Flores, M., & Houchins, D. E. (2007). Computational fluency performance profile of high school students with mathematics disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 28(5), 292–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18, 80–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christ, T. J., & Vining, O. (2006). Curriculum-based measurement procedures to develop multiple-skill mathematics computation probes: Evaluation of random and stratified stimulus-set arrangements. School Psychology Review, 35(3), 387–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., & Shinn, M. R. (2004). A preliminary investigation into the identification and development of early mathematics curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Today, 33(2), 234–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker, D. L., & Ritchey, K. D. (2010). Curriculum-based measurement of writing in kindergarten and first grade: An investigation of production and qualitative scores. Exceptional Children, 76(2), 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellerman, P., Coirier, P., Marchand, E. (1996). Planning and expertise in argumentative composition. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models, and methodology in writing research (pp. 182–195). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deno S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston: Council for Exceptional Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S., Marston, D., Mirkin, P., Lowry, L., Sindelar, P., & Jenkins, J. (1982). The use of standard tasks to measure achievement in reading, spelling, and written expression: A normative and developmental study (Vol. IRLD-RR-87). Minnesota: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49(1), 36–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P., & Marston, D. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children Special Education and Pediatrics: A New Relationship, 48, 368–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowhower, S. L. (1991). Speaking of prosody: Fluency’s unattended bedfellow. Theory into Practice, 30(3), 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espin, C. A., Busch, T. W., Shin, J., & Kruschwitz, R. (2001). Curriculum-based measurement in the content areas: Validity of vocabulary-matching as an indicator of performance in social studies. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16(3), 142–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espin, C. A., Shin, J. & Busch, T. W. (2005). Curriculum-based measurement in the content areas: Vocabulary matching as an indicator of progress in social studies learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 353–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foegen, A., & Morrison, C. (2010). Putting algebra progress monitoring into practice: Insights from the field. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46(2), 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foegen, A., Olson, J. R., Impecoven-Lind, L. (2008). Developing progress monitoring measures for secondary mathematics: An illustration in algebra. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33(4), 240–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S. (2004). The past, present, and future of curriculum-based measurement research. School Psychology Review, 33(2), 188–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (n.d.). Using CBM for progress monitoring. National Center of Student Progress Monitoring. http://www.studentprogress.org/. Accessed 08 April 2014.

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Zumeta, R. O. (2008). A curricular-sampling approach to progress monitoring: Mathematics concepts and applications. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33(4), 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., VanDerHeyden, A. M., Naquin, G. M., & Slider, N. J. (2002). Moving beyond total words written: The reliability, criterion validity, and time cost of alternate measures for curriculum-based measures in writing. School Psychology Review, 31(4), 477–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, D. S. (1994). Computer-based dynamic assessment of multidigit multiplication. Exceptional Children, 61, 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R., Clarke, B., Jordan, N. C., Newman-Gonchar, R., Haymond, K., & Wilkins, C. (2012). Universal screening in mathematics for the primary grades: Beginnings of a research base. Exceptional Children, 78(4), 423–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills, 6th edn. Eugene: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Y. M., Watson, D., & Burke, C. (1987). The reading miscue inventory. Katonah: Richard C. Owen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 620. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. R., & Shinn, M. R. (2003). Characteristics of word callers: An investigation of the accuracy of teachers’ judgments of reading comprehension and oral reading skills. School Psychology Review, 32, 228–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, Lembke, & Summers. (2010). Examining the technical adequacy of early writing curriculum-based progress monitoring measures (Unpublished manuscript). Columbia: University of Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. (1994). The Morningside model of generative instruction. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman et al. (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 173–197). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. S., Jenkins, J. R., & Petscher, Y. (2010). Improving the accuracy of a direct route screening process. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(3), 131–140. doi:10.1177/1534508409348375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. S., Galow, P. A., & Allenger, R. (2013). Application of algebra curriculum-based measurements for decision making in middle and high school. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kame'enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., Good, R. H., & Harn, B. A. (2000). The use of fluency-based measures in early identification and evaluation of intervention efficacy in schools. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Time, fluency, and dyslexia (pp. 307–333). Parkton: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovaleski, J. F., Van Der Heyden, A. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (2013). The RTI approach to evaluating learning disabilities. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M., Schwanenflugel, P., & Meisinger, E. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230–251. http://dx.doi:.org/10.1598/rrq.45.2.4. Accessed 15 Apr 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Berge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lembke, E. & Stecker, P. (2007). Curriculum-based measurement in mathematics: An evidence-based formative assessment procedure. Portsmouth: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED521574.pdf. Accessed 09 Apr 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lembke, E., Deno, S. L., & Hall, K. (2003). Identifying an indicator of growth in early writing proficiency for elementary school students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(3–4), 23–35. doi:10.1177/073724770302800304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lembke, E.S., McMaster, K., & Stecker, P.M. (2009). The prevention science of reading research within a response-to-intervention model. Psychology in the Schools, 47(1), 22–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, O. R. (1990). Precision teaching: By teachers for children. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22(3), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter, A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (2006). Cognitive factors in the development of children’s writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 115–130). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlinchey, M. & Hixson, M. (2004). Using curriculum-based measurement to predict performance on state assessments in reading. School Psychology Review, 33, 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, K., & Espin, C. (2007). Technical features of curriculum-based measurement in writing: A literature review. Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, K. L., Du, X., & Petursdottir, A. (2009). Technical features of curriculum-based measures for beginning writers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 41–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, K. L., Du, X., Yeo, S., Deno, S. L., Parker, D., & Ellis, T. (2011). Curriculum-based measures of beginning writing: Technical features of the slope. Exceptional Children, 77(2), 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. S., & Felton, R. H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49(1), 283–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII, 2012/2014). Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Intensive Intervention. U.S. Department of Education: Washington, DC.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008).Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2001). Looking at mathematics and learning. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (pp. 1–16). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. C., McMaster, K. L., Medhanie, A., & Silberglitt, B. (2011). Modeling early writing growth with curriculum-based measures. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(4), 290–304. doi:10.1037/a0026833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. W., & Goldman, S. R. (1987). Information processing and elementary mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(1), 23–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985).Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puranik, C. S., & Alotaiba, S. (2012). Examining the contribution of handwriting and spelling to written expression in kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1523–1546.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, A., Busch, T., Betts, J., Deno, S., & Long, J. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47(6), 427–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, K. D., & Speece, D. L. (2006). From letter names to word reading: The nascent role of sublexical fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 301–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhymer, K. N., Dittmer, K. I., Skinner, C. H., & Jackson, B. (2000). Effectiveness of a multi-component treatment for improving mathematics fluency. School Psychology Quarterly, 15(1), 40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, S. J. (1997). The method of repeated readings. Psychology, 6, 293–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, P. A. (1980). On the acquisition of reading fluency. Journal of Literacy Research, 12(3), 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenflugel, Hamilton, Wisenbaker, Kuhn, & Stahl. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., & Crain, S. (1986). Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach. Cognition, 24(1), 139–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shinn, M. R. (2012). Reflections on the influence of CBM on educational practice and policy and its progenitor. In C. Espin, K. L. McMaster, S. Rose, & M. M. Wayman (Eds.), Measure of success: The influence of curriculum-based measurement on education (pp. 341–356). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement: A confirmatory analysis of its relationship to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stage, S. A., Sheppard, J., Davidson, M. M., & Browning, M. M. (2001). Prediction of first-graders’ growth in oral reading fluency using kindergarten letter fluency. Journal of School Psychology, 39(3), 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. N. (2012). Toward meaning-driven mathematical fluency. School Science and Mathematics, 112(6), 327–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tindal, G. (2013). Curriculum-based measurement: A brief history of nearly everything from the 1970s to the present. ISRN Education (International Scholarly Research Network). doi:10.1155/2013/958530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindal, G., & Parker, R. (1991). Identifying measures for evaluating written expression. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6(4), 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Videen, J., Deno, S. L., & Marston, D. (1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of proficiency in written expression, Vol. IRLD-RR-84. Minnesota: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A., & Greig Bowers, P. (1995). Individual difference and text difficulty determinants of reading fluency and expressiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60(3), 428–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. R., Bowers, P. G., & MacKinnon, G. E. (1996). Effects of prosodic modeling and repeated reading on poor readers' fluency and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17(1), 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

    Erica S. Lembke, Abigail Carlisle & Apryl Poch

Authors
  1. Erica S. Lembke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abigail Carlisle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Apryl Poch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erica S. Lembke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA

    Kelli D. Cummings

  2. Florida State University, Florida State University Florida Center for Reading Research, Tallahassee, Florida, USA

    Yaacov Petscher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lembke, E., Carlisle, A., Poch, A. (2016). Using Curriculum-Based Measurement Fluency Data for Initial Screening Decisions. In: Cummings, K., Petscher, Y. (eds) The Fluency Construct. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2803-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation