What Is Fluency?

Chapter

Abstract

Fluency is a ubiquitous, but a complicated term. This chapter provides an overview of various conceptions of fluency across a range of disciplines and research contexts as well as discusses implications for research, assessment, and instruction. We include an overview of definitions and exemplars of fluency in language use, reading, and mathematics followed by an exploration of fluency concepts (e.g., automaticity, efficiency, and procedural skill) and considerations for research. The chapter concludes with recommendations for investigations of fluency including attending to measurement issues, explicitly defining and analyzing discrete components of fluency, and leveraging these precise definitions to evaluate the interactions between task and proficiency inherent to fluency exercises.

Keywords

Fluency Automaticity Language proficiency Educational assessment Mathematics 

References

  1. Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19(9), 933–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allington, R. L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. Reading Teacher, 36(6), 556–561.Google Scholar
  3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1999). Terminology pertaining to fluency and fluency disorders: guidelines (Guidelines). www.asha.org/policy. http://www.asha.org/docs/html/GL1999-00063.html#sthash.7J4aMThZ.dpuf.
  4. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89(4), 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. R. (1996). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51(4), 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, D. L., Biancarosa, G., Park, B. J., Bousselot, T., Smith, J., Baker, S. K., Kame’enui, E. J., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (in press). Validity of CBM measures of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension on high-stakes reading assessments in Grades 7 and 8. Reading & Writing. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9505-4.Google Scholar
  7. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benjamin, R. G., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2010). Text complexity and oral reading prosody in young readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 388–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benjamin, R. G., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Groff, C., Kuhn, M. R., & Steiner, L. (2013). A spectrographically grounded scale for evaluating reading expressiveness. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 105–133. doi:10.1002/rrq.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brasseur-Hock, I. F., Hock, M. F., Kieffer, M. J., Biancarosa, G., & Deshler, D. D. (2011). Adolescent struggling readers in urban schools: Results of a latent class analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 438–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bull, R., & Johnston, R. S. (1997). Children’s arithmetical difficulties: Contributions from processing speed, item identification, and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 1–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Buly, M. R., & Valencia, S. W. (2002). Below the bar: Profiles of students who fail state reading assessments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carnine, D. (1997). Instructional design in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 130–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Case, R., Kurland, D. M., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386–404. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(82)90054-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Adlof, S. M. (2005). Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities. In H. W. Catts & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 25–40). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Chambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency? System, 25(4), 535–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chard, D. J., Clarke, B., Baker, S., Otterstedt, J., Braun, D., & Katz, R. (2005). Using measures of number sense to screen for difficulties in mathematics: Preliminary findings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30(2), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chiappe, P. (2005). How reading research can inform mathematics difficulties: The search for the core deficit. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 313–317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Clarke, B., & Shinn, M. (2004). A preliminary investigation into the identification and development of early mathematics curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Review, 33, 234–248.Google Scholar
  20. Clarke, B., Nelson, N., & Shanley, L. (in-press). Mathematics fluency: more than the weekly timed test. In K. D. Cummings & Y. Petscher (Eds.), Fluency metrics in education: Implications for test developers, researchers, and practitioners. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Cowie, R., Douglas-Cowie, E., & Wichmann, A. (2002). Prosodic characteristics of skilled reading: Fluency and expressiveness in 8-10-year-old readers. Language and Speech, 45(1), 47–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Daane, M. C., Campbell, J. R., Grigg, W. S., Goodman, M. J., & Oranje, A. (2005). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading (NCES 2006—469). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  23. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deschuyteneer, M., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). The role of response selection and input monitoring in solving simple arithmetical products. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1472–1483.Google Scholar
  26. Ehri, L.C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188.Google Scholar
  27. Espin, C.A., & Deno, S.L. (in-press). Oral reading fluency or reading aloud from text: An analysis through a unified view of construct validity. In K. D. Cummings & Y. Petscher (Eds.). Fluency metrics in education: implications for test developers, researchers, and practitioners. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Farukh, A., & Vulchanova, M. (2014). Predictors of reading in Urdu: Does deep orthography have an impact? Dyslexia, 20(2), 146–166.Google Scholar
  29. Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. In C. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. S.-Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 85–101). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  30. Fisk, A. D., & Schneider, W. (1984). Memory as a function of attention, level of processing, and automatization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(2), 181–197.Google Scholar
  31. Floyd, R., Evans, J. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2003). Relations between measures of Cathill-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and mathematics achievement across the school-age years. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 155–171. doi:10.1002/pits.10083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fluency. (n.d.). In Oxford Dictionaries English online dictionary. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/fluency.
  33. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (2013). Anticipating a post-task activity: The effects on accuracy, complexity, and fluency of second language performance. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(3), 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Marsten, D. (1983). Improving the reliability of curriculum-based measures of academic skills for psychoeducational decision making. Diagnostique, 8, 135–149.Google Scholar
  36. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Geary, D. C. (1993). Mathematical disabilities: Cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 345–362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Geary, D. C., Brown, S. C., & Samaranayake, V. A. (1991). Cognitive addition: A short longitudinal study of strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in normal and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 787–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gojak, L. M. (2012, Nov 1). Fluency: Simply fast and accurate? I think not! National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. http://www.nctm.org/about/content.aspx?id=34791
  41. Goodman, K. S. (1973). The 13th easy way to make learning to read difficult: A reaction to Gleitman and Rozin. Reading Research Quarterly, 8(4), 484–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hamilton, C., & Shinn, M. R. (2003). Characteristics of word callers: An investigation of the accuracy of teachers’ judgments of reading comprehension and oral reading skills. School Psychology Review, 32(2), 228–240.Google Scholar
  44. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(3), 356–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L. I., & Bransford, J. D. (1988). Developing math automaticity in learning handicapped children: The role of computerized drill and practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20(6), 1–7.Google Scholar
  46. Hoffman, B., & Spatriu, A. (2008). The influence of self-efficacy and metacognitve prompting on math problem-solving efficiency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 875–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF) in second language acquisition research (special issue). Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency: Definitions, measurement, and research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA (pp. 1–20). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hudson, R. F., Pullen, P. C., Lane, H. B., & Torgesen, J. K. (2009). The complex nature of reading fluency: A multidimensional view. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25(1), 4–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C.A., & Deno, S.L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 719–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jonides, J., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Palmer, J. (1985). Assessing automaticity. Acta Psychologica, 60(2–3), 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kershaw, S., & Schatschneider, C. (2012). A latent variable approach to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 433–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Logan, G. D. (1985). Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. MacKay, D. G. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89(5), 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Martin, J. G., & Meltzer, R. H. (1976). Visual rhythms: Report on a method for facilitating the teaching of reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 8(2), 53–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Meisinger, E. B., Bradley, B. A., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Kuhn, M. R., & Morris, R. D. (2009). Myth and reality of the word caller: The relation between teacher nominations and prevalence among elementary school children. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(3), 147–159.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Meisinger, E. B., Bradley, B. A., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Kuhn, M. R. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of word callers and related literacy concepts. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 54–68.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2008). A longitudinal study of reading prosody as a dimension of oral reading fluency in early elementary school children. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(4), 336–354.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Nathan, R. G., & Stanovich, K. E. (1991). The causes and consequences of differences in reading fluency. Theory into Practice, 30(3), 176–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  65. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  68. Puolakanaho, A., Ahonen, T., Aro, M., Eklund, K., Leppanen, P. H. T., Poikkeus, A.-M., Tolvanen, A., Torppa, M., & Lyytinen, H. (2008). Developmental links to very early phonological and language skills to second grade reading outcomes: Strong to accuracy but only minor to fluency. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(4), 353–370.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Rasinski, T., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research & Instruction, 48(4), 350–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rhymer, K. N., Dittmer, K. I., Skinner, C. H., & Jackson, B. (2000). Effectiveness of a multi-component treatment for improving mathematics fluency. School Psychology Quarterly, 15(1), 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rindermann, H., & Neubauer, A. C. (2004). Processing speed, intelligence, creativity, and school performance: Testing of causal hypotheses using structural equation models. Intelligence, 32, 573–589. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2004.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. Reading Teacher, 32, 403–408.Google Scholar
  73. Samuels, S. J. (2007). The DIBELS tests: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by reading fluency?: Commentary on “The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban first-grade students.” Reading Research Quarterly, 42(4), 563–566.Google Scholar
  74. Samuels, S. J., Ediger, K.-A., & Fautsch-Patridge, T. (2005). The importance of fluent reading. New England Reading Association Journal, 41(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  75. Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(4), 357–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schreiber, P. A. (1980). On the acquisition of reading fluency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12(3), 177–186.Google Scholar
  77. Silverman, R. D., Speece, D. L., Harring, J. R., & Ritchey, K. D. (2013). Fluency has a role in the simple view of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(2), 108–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Slocum, T. A., Street, E. M., & Gilberts, G. (1995). A review of research and theory on the relation between oral reading rate and reading comprehension. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 377–398. doi: 10.1007/bf02114539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Smith, F., & Holmes, D. L. (1971). The independence of letter, word, and meaning identification. Reading Research Quarterly, 6, 394–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Thorndike, R. M., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (2010). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (8th ed). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  81. Thurlow, R., & van den Broek, P. (1997). Automaticity and inference generation during reading comprehension. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 165–181.Google Scholar
  82. Tilstra, J., McMaster, K., van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & Rapp, D. (2009). Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(4), 383–401.Google Scholar
  83. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2012). Test of word reading efficiency (2nd ed). Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  84. Vagh, S. B., & Biancarosa, G. (2011, July). Early literacy in Hindi: The role of oral reading fluency. Poster presented at the 12th International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  85. Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center on Teaching and LearningUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations