Skip to main content

Integrated Language Intervention for Children with Hearing Loss

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Earlier generations of deaf children were educated with curricula based on models of learning that were hierarchically organized and modular, such that low-level perceptual processes operated without input from higher level processes or from other sensory systems. Information derived at each level of processing could only flow up in the system. However, research from a variety of sources is demonstrating that information flows more broadly in the nervous system, such that higher level processes can affect lower level processes and there is cross talk among sensory systems. Behavioral interventions that take advantage of these integrated systems facilitate optimal outcomes. This chapter describes an integrated approach to language intervention that can help shape educational and clinical treatments for all children with hearing loss, including those with cochlear implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beebe H. Deaf children can learn to hear. J Commun Disord. 1978;11:193–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boons T, Brokx JP, Frijns JH, Peeraer L, Philips B, Vermeulen A, et al. Effect of pediatric bilateral cochlear implantation on language development. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166:28–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe J, Bishop DV, Norbury CF. Phonological processing, language, and literacy: a comparison of children with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss and those with specific language impairment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001;42:329–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carrow-Woolfolk E. Comprehensive assessment of spoken language (CASL). Pearson Assessments: Bloomington, MN; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky C. The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10 [dissertation]. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor CM, Craig HK, Raudenbush SW, Heavner K, Zwolan TA. The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: Is there an added value for early implantation? Ear Hear. 2006;27:628–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther CS, Mann V. Native language factors affecting use of vocalic cues to final consonant voicing in English. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992;92:711–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther CS, Mann V. Use of vocalic cues to consonant voicing and native language background: the influence of experimental design. Percept Psychophys. 1994;55:513–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JM, Elfenbein J, Schum R, Bentler RA. Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children. J Speech Hear Dis. 1986;51:53–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers JG, de Villiers PA, Hoban E. The central problem of functional categories in the English syntax of oral deaf children. In: Tager-Flusberg H, editor. Constraints on language acquisition: studies of atypical children. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1994. p. 9–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delage H, Tuller L. Language development and mild-to-moderate hearing loss: does language normalize with age? J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50:1300–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dettman SJ, Pinder D, Briggs RJ, Dowell RC, Leigh JR. Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant younger than 12 months: risks versus benefits. Ear Hear. 2007;28:11S–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erber NP. Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Hear Res. 1972;15:413–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erber NP. Auditory-visual perception of speech. J Speech Hear Dis. 1975;40:481–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Escudero P, Benders T, Lipski SC. Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels: the case of Dutch, German and Spanish listeners. J Phon. 2009;37:452–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estabrooks W. 50 frequently asked questions (FAQs) about auditory-verbal therapy. Toronto, Ontario: Learning to Listen Foundation; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson CA, Farwell CB. Words and sounds in early language acquisition: English initial consonants in the first fifty words. Language. 1975;51:419–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald E. Straight language for the deaf: a system of instruction for deaf children. The McClure Company: Staunton, VA; 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flege JE, Port R. Cross-language phonetic interference: Arabic to English. Lang Speech. 1981;24:125–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geers AE, Nicholas JG. Enduring advantages of early cochlear implantation for spoken language development. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56:643–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geers AE, Nicholas JG, Sedey AL. Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation. Ear Hear. 2003;24:46S–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbertson M, Kamhi AG. Novel word learning in children with hearing impairment. J Speech Hear Res. 1995;38:630–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein MA. Advanced method in teaching the deaf. Laryngoscope. 1897;2:349–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon KA, Valero J, Papsin BC. Binaural processing in children using bilateral cochlear implants. Neuroreport. 2007;16(18):613–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon KA, Valero J, van Hoesel R, Papsin BC. Abnormal timing delays in auditory brainstem responses evoked by bilateral cochlear implant use in children. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29:193–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon KA, Wong DD, Papsin BC. Bilateral input protects the cortex from unilaterally-driven reorganization in children who are deaf. Brain. 2013;136:1609–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenlee M. Learning the phonetic cues to the voiced-voiceless distinction: a comparison of child and adult speech perception. J Child Lang. 1980;7:459–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grieco-Calub TM, Litovsky RY. Sound localization skills in children who use bilateral cochlear implants and in children with normal acoustic hearing. Ear Hear. 2010;31:645–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Houston DM, Miyamoto RT. Effects of early auditory experience on word learning and speech perception in deaf children with cochlear implants: Implications for sensitive periods of language development. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31:1248–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Imada T, Zhang Y, Cheour M, Taulu S, Ahonen A, Kuhl PK. Infant speech perception activates Broca’s area: a developmental magnetoencephalography study. Neuroreport. 2006;17:957–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson P, Kuhl PK, Kahane-Yamada R, Diesch E, Tohkura Y, Kettermann A, et al. A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cogn. 2003;87:B47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan A, Jones H, Litovsky RY. Issues in binaural hearing in bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;133:3330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayser C, Logothetis NK. Do early sensory cortices integrate cross-modal information? Brain Struct Funct. 2007;212:121–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kimchi R. Perceptual organization and visual attention. Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:15–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk KI, Miyamoto RT, Ying EA, Perdew AE, Zuganelis H. Cochlear implantation in young children: effects of age at implantation and communication mode. Volta Rev. 2000;102:127–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause SE. Vowel duration as a perceptual cue to postvocalic consonant voicing in young children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am. 1982;71:990–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl PK. Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition. Neuron. 2010;67:713–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann C, Herdener M, Esposito F, Hubl D, di Salle F, Scheffler K, et al. Differential patterns of multisensory interactions in core and belt areas of human auditory cortex. Neuroimage. 2006;31:294–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh J, Dettman S, Dowell R, Briggs R. Communication development in children who receive a cochlear implant by 12 months of age. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34:443–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman AM, Mattingly IG. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cogn. 1985;21:1–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman AM, Cooper FS, Shankweiler DP, Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychol Rev. 1967;74:431–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman IY, Shankweiler D, Fischer FW, Carter B. Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. J Exp Child Psychol. 1974;18:201–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luterman DM. A comparison of language skills of hearing impaired children trained in a visual/oral method and an auditory/oral method. Am Ann Deaf. 1976;121:389–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKain KS, Best CT, Strange W. Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals. Appl Psycholinguist. 1981;2:369–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo C, Scobbie JM, Hewlett N, Waters D. The influence of phonemic awareness development on acoustic cue weighting strategies in children’s speech perception. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;46:1184–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA, Nicely PE. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am. 1955;27(2):338–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misurelli SM, Litovsky RY. Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: Effect of interferer asymmetry. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012;132:380–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Miyawaki K, Strange W, Verbrugge R, Liberman AM, Jenkins JJ, Fujimura O. An effect of linguistic experience: the discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Percept Psychophys. 1975;18:331–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newport EL, Bavelier D, Neville HJ. Critical thinking about critical periods: perspectives on a critical period for language acquisition. In: Dupoux E, editor. Language, brain, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2001. p. 481–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer S. Age-related differences in perceptual effects of formant transitions within syllables and across syllable boundaries. J Phon. 1992;20:351–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer S. Discriminability and perceptual weighting of some acoustic cues to speech perception by three-year-olds. J Speech Hear Res. 1996;39:278–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer S. The role of temporal and dynamic signal components in the perception of syllable-final stop voicing by children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;115:1777–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer S, Chapman C. The effects of bilateral electric and bimodal electric-acoustic stimulation on language development. Trends Amplif. 2009;13:190–205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer S, Crowther CS. Examining the role of auditory sensitivity in the developmental weighting shift. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41:809–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer S, Lowenstein JH. Perceptual organization of speech signals by children with and without dyslexia. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:2304–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer S, Miller ME. Developmental weighting shifts for noise components of fricative-vowel syllables. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;102:572–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer S, Studdert-Kennedy M. The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults. J Speech Hear Res. 1987;30:319–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer S, Manning C, Meyer G. The perceptual weighting of acoustic cues changes with linguistic experience. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993;94:S1865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer S, Caldwell A, Lowenstein JH, Tarr E, Holloman C. Emergent literacy in kindergartners with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2012;33:683–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer S, Caldwell-Tarr A, Tarr E, Lowenstein JH, Rice C, Moberly AC. Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow. Int J Audiol. 2013;52:513–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer S, Tarr E, Bolster V, Caldwell-Tarr A, Moberly AC, Lowenstein J. Very low-frequency signals support perceptual organization of implant-simulated speech for adults and children. Int J Audiol. 2014;53:270–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Norbury CF, Bishop DV, Briscoe J. Production of English finite verb morphology: a comparison of SLI and mild-moderate hearing impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44:165–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Numbers ME, Hudgins CV. Speech perception in present day education for deaf children. Volta Rev. 1948;50:449–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekkola J, Ojanen V, Autti T, Jaaskelainen IP, Mottonen R, Tarkiainen A, et al. Primary auditory cortex activation by visual speech: An fMRI study at 3 T. Neuroreport. 2005;16:125–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack D. Educational audiology for the limited hearing infant and preschooler. C.C. Thomas: Springfield, IL; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack D. An acoupedic program. In: Ling D, editor. Early intervention for hearing-impaired children: oral options. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press; 1984. p. 181–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power DJ, Hyde MB. Multisensory and unisensory approaches to communicating with deaf children. Eur J Psychol Educ. 1997;12:449–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remez RE, Rubin PE, Pisoni DB, Carrell TD. Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science. 1981;212:947–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Remez RE, Fellowes JM, Pisoni DB, Goh WD, Rubin PE. Multimodal perceptual organization of speech: evidence from tone analogs of spoken utterances. Speech Commun. 1998;26:65–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Remez RE, Pardo JS, Piorkowski RL, Rubin PE. On the bistability of sine wave analogues of speech. Psychol Sci. 2001;12:24–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen S, Manganari E. Is there a relationship between speech and nonspeech auditory processing in children with dyslexia? J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44:720–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siren KA, Wilcox KA. Effects of lexical meaning and practiced productions on coarticulation in children’s and adults’ speech. J Speech Hear Res. 1995;38:351–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Storkel HL. Restructuring of similarity neighbourhoods in the developing mental lexicon. J Child Lang. 2002;29:251–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todd NDM, Lee CS, O’Boyle DJ. A sensorimotor theory of speech perception: Implications for learning, organization, and recognition. In: Greenberg S, Ainsworth WA, editors. Listening to speech: an auditory perspective. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006. p. 351–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomblin JB, Barker BA, Hubbs S. Developmental constraints on language development in children with cochlear implants. Int J Audiol. 2007;46:512–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuller L, Jakubowicz C. Développment de la morphosyntaxe du français chez des enfants sourds moyens [Morphosyntactic development of French in children with moderate hearing loss]. Le Langage et l’Homme: Logopédie, Psychologie, Audiologie. 2004;14:191–207. French.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake M, Hughes EK, Poulakis Z, Collins C, Rickards FW. Outcomes of children with mild-profound congenital hearing loss at 7 to 8 years: A population study. Ear Hear. 2004;25:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker EA, McGregor KK. Word learning processes in children with cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56:375–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walley AC. The role of vocabulary development in children’s spoken word recognition and segmentation ability. Dev Rev. 1993;13:286–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley AC, Smith LB, Jusczyk PW. The role of phonemes and syllables in the perceived similarity of speech sounds for children. Mem Cognit. 1996;14:220–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardrip-Fruin C, Peach S. Developmental aspects of the perception of acoustic cues in determining the voicing feature of final stop consonants. Lang Speech. 1984;27:367–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox K, Morris S. Children’s speech intelligibility measure. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward MF, Barber CG. Phoneme perception in lipreading. J Speech Hear Res. 1960;3:212–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman IL, Steiner VG, Pond RE. Preschool language scale. 4th ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Nittrouer Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nittrouer, S. (2016). Integrated Language Intervention for Children with Hearing Loss. In: Young, N., Iler Kirk, K. (eds) Pediatric Cochlear Implantation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2788-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2788-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2787-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2788-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics