Skip to main content

Abstract

In our direct work with adolescents with disruptive behaviors, we use an engagement strategy consistent with the basic objectives and techniques of solution-focused counseling. We have found that solution-focused approaches strengthen the therapeutic alliance and motivate adolescents to attempt specific interventions introduced later in the Challenging Horizons Program. Our approach is somewhat unorthodox because we blend strategies based on seemingly incompatible theories: On the one hand, we use solution-focused strategies focusing on the adolescent’s strengths and stated goals; and on the other hand, we introduce a set of predefined, manualized interventions that target common attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-related impairments. Despite the surface contradictions, we have found that using solution-focused strategies early in the intervention process is effective in reducing the potential hesitancies many adolescents feel when starting work with a counselor, thereby opening the door to technique-driven interventions later. In this chapter, we describe the basic tenets of this strategy and discuss ways that practitioners can engage clients with ADHD who may initially be resistant to intervention.

The necessity for bringing the child into a good relationship to his mentor is of prime importance. The worker cannot leave this to chance; he must deliberately achieve it and he must face the fact that no effective work is possible without it.

August Aichhorn, from Wayward Youth (1925)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The philosopher Karl Popper criticized Freud’s Psychoanalysis and Adler’s Individual Psychology be-cause the underlying theories cannot be falsified; thus, according to Popper, these therapies cannot be considered scientific, although still potentially useful. Popper came to this conclusion even though he personally admired Alfred Adler. In a famous lecture, Popper told the following story: “Once, in 1919, I reported to [Adler] a case which to me did not seem particularly Adlerian, but which he found no difficulty in analyzing in terms of his theory of inferiority feelings, although he had not even seen the child. Slightly shocked, I asked him how he could be so sure. ‘Because of my thousand-fold experience,’ he replied; whereupon I could not help saying: ‘And with this new case, I suppose, your experience has become thousand-and-one-fold’” (Popper 1963). Popper’s point was that Adler simply looked for cases to validate his theory and found evidence everywhere, rather than testing whether predictions based on his theory held. The former strategy is pseudo-scientific and dogmatic, where the latter is scientific and flexible.

  2. 2.

    Murphy (2008) and Watzlawick et al. (1974) use the nine-dot puzzle to make the same point.

  3. 3.

    In our work with adolescents with ADHD, we rarely discuss the disorder or attempt to understand all of the potential cognitive deficits at play. Instead, we focus almost entirely on functional outcomes.

  4. 4.

    According to Franklin et al. (2001), these defining elements of SFBT were reviewed and approved by both Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg in 1997 in personal communication.

  5. 5.

    In a classic social psychology experiment, researchers found that children who received teacher encour-agement that presupposed success outperformed children who were lectured and persuaded (e.g., “You should…”) on outcomes related to classroom rule compliance and academic performance (Miller et al. 1975). In our view, the presuppositional language of SFBT is a fantastic example of how to apply these lessons to counseling.

  6. 6.

    When conducting research in schools, it is often difficult to conduct randomization to condition because of the difficulties this can create for the school schedule, so the limitations in the studies above are not necessarily surprising.

  7. 7.

    In these scenarios, we use verbatim transcripts from actual counseling sessions recorded during our studies. The only changes made to these transcripts were the removal of excessive verbal markers (e.g., “um, um…”) and information that could identify the clients. In all cases, informed consent was acquired from parents and the adolescents prior to taping, and our consent procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at James Madison University and Ohio University.

  8. 8.

    This question may have been better phrased as, “What gives your supervisor that impression?”

  9. 9.

    As we discuss in Chap. 5, we use this scale frequently when helping adolescents to set and then assess their performance on their social goals.

  10. 10.

    Claims of abuse or suicidal thinking (or any other potentially dangerous situations) should be handled appropriately—always ensuring clients are safe—but we assume that readers have the appropriate back-ground in these precautions.

References

  • Barkley, R. A. (Ed.). (2006). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budman, S. H. (1981). Looking toward the future. In S. H. Budman (Ed.), Forms of brief therapy (pp. 461–467). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B. (2008). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Needham Heights. MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Shazer, S. (1985). Keys to solution in brief therapy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Shazer, S. (1988). Clues: Investigating solutions in brief therapy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Shazer, S. (1997). Radical acceptance. Family, Systems, and Health, 15, 375–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, C., & Streeter, C. L. (2005). Solution-focused alternatives for education: An evaluation of Gonzalo Garza Independent High School. Austin: University of Texas, Hogg Foundation for Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, C., Biever, J., Moore, K., Clemons, D., & Scamardo, M. (2001). The effectiveness of solution-focused therapy with children in a school setting. Research on Social Work Practice, 11, 411–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, C., Moore, K., & Hopson, L. (2008). Effectiveness of solution-focused brief therapy in a school setting. Children and Schools, 30, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, W. J., & Eisengart, S. (2000). Solution-focused brief therapy: A review of the outcome research. Family Process, 39, 477–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2008). Blinded by anger or feeling the love: How emotions influence advice taking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1165–1173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. E., & Kinnier, R. T. (2001). Homework in counseling. In H. G. Rosenthal (Ed.), Favorite counseling and therapy homework assignments (pp. 223–234). Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., Gosch, E., Furr, J. M., & Sood, E. (2008). Flexibility within fidelity. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 987–993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd edn.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. L., Brickman, P., & Bolen, D. (1975). Attribution versus persuasion as a means of modifying behavior. The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 430–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MTA Cooperative Group. (2004). National institute of mental health multimodal treatment study of ADHD follow-up: Changes in effectiveness and growth after the end of treatment. Pediatrics, 113, 762–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. J. (1997). Solution-focused counseling in middle and high schools. Alexandria: American Counseling Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. J. (2008). Solution-focused counseling in schools (2nd ed.). Alexandria: American Counseling Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome, S. (2004). Solution-focused brief therapy groupwork with at-risk junior high school students: Enhancing the bottom line. Research on Social Work Practice, 14, 336–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsome, S. (2005). The impact of solution-focused brief therapy with at-risk junior high school students. Children & Schools, 27, 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, H. T. (2007). Counseling and psychotherapy with children and adolescents: Historical developmental, integrative, and effectiveness perspectives. In H. T. Prout & D. T. Brown (Eds.), Counseling and psychotherapy with children and adolescents: Theory and practice for school and clinical settings (3rd ed., pp. 1–31). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selekman, M. D. (1997). Solution focused therapy with children: Harnessing family strengths for systemic change. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, M. H., Kuriyan, A. B., Evans, S. W., Waxmonsky, J., & Smith, B. H. (2014). Pharmacological and psychosocial treatments for adolescents with ADHD: An updated systematic review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 218–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taffel, R. (2005). Breaking through to teens: A new psychotherapy for the new adolescence. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures. (1995). Training in and dissemination of empirically-validated psychological treatments: Report and recommendations. Clinical Psychologist, 48, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyron, W. W. (2007). What ever happened to symptom substitution? Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 963–968..

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon K. Schultz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schultz, B., Evans, S. (2015). Counseling Adolescents with ADHD. In: A Practical Guide to Implementing School-Based Interventions for Adolescents with ADHD. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2677-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics