Skip to main content

Telemedicine for Trauma and Intensive Care: Changing the Paradigm of Telepresence

  • Chapter
Book cover Technological Advances in Surgery, Trauma and Critical Care

Abstract

Telemedicine and telepresence for surgical care are becoming common practice and are an effective and safe way of providing healthcare services. Various terms are used when describing telemedicine overall, such as telehealth and telecare. What makes the issue even more complex when it comes to telemedicine for surgery. When one recognizes that over 5.8 million people die from trauma each year worldwide, and five million patients are admitted to the ICU each year (only in the USA), one can understand the possible importance of telemedicine in providing care for the sickest of and the injured patients. Telemedicine for ICU has been called “tele-ICU,” “e-ICU,” and virtual ICU. The use of telemedicine for trauma and emergency has been termed “teletrauma.” All, however, have the same meaning: use of telemedicine to provide care at the distance, whenever the patient is. The use of telemedicine for trauma and ICU has been associated with significantly better outcomes such as decrease of mortality and morbidity, decrease in Length of Stay (LOS), and an increase in staff satisfaction in workload and usefulness of telemedicine technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. DeBakey ME. The living heart. New York: Charter Books; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Merrell RC. Changing the medical world order with technological advances: the future has only begun. In: Latifi R, editor. Establishing telemedicine in developing countries: from inception to implementation. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, Smith M, Vix M, Simone M, et al. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery; feasibility and potential applications. Am Surg. 2002;235:487–92.

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization National eHealth Strategy Toolkit. http://www.itu.int/pub/D-STR-E_HEALTH.05-2012. Accessed 24 Jan 2014.

  5. National Institutes of Health, Fogarty Center. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-14-028.html. Accessed 8 Oct 2014.

  6. American College of Surgeons. Health Information Technology Committee. https://www.facs.org/about-acs/governance/acs-committees/health-information-technology-committee. Accessed 8 Oct 2014.

  7. Latifi R, Peck K, Satava R, Anvari M. Telepresence and telementoring in surgery. In: Latifi R, editor. Establishing telemedicine in developing countries: from inception to implementation. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2004. p. 201–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reynolds HN, Rogove H, Bander J, McCambridge M, Cowboy E, Niemeier M. A working lexicon for the tele-intensive care unit: We need to define teleintensive care unit to grow and understand it. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17:773–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenfeld BA, Dorman T, Breslow MJ, et al. Intensive care unit telemedicine: alternate paradigm for providing continuous intensivist care. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3925–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas EJ, Lucke JF, Wueste L, et al. Association of telemedicine for remote monitoring of intensive care patients with mortality, complications, and length of stay. JAMA. 2009;302:2671–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lilly CM, Thomas EJ. Tele-ICU: experience to date. J Intensive Care Med. 2010;25:16–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zawada Jr ET, Herr P, Larson D, et al. Impact of an intensive care unit telemedicine program on a rural health care system. Postgrad Med. 2009;121:160–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Willmitch B, Golembeski S, Kim SS, et al. Clinical outcomes after telemedicine intensive care unit implementation. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:450–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lilly CM, Zubrow MT, Kempner KM, Reynolds HN, Subramanian S, Eriksson EA, Jenkins CL, Rincon TA, Kohl BA, Groves Jr RH, Cowboy ER, Mbekeani KE, McDonald MJ, Rascona DA, Ries MH, Rogove HJ, Badr AE, Kopec IC, Society of Critical Care Medicine Tele-ICU Committee. Critical care telemedicine: evolution and state of the art. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(11):2429–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reynolds EM, Grujovski A, Wright T, et al. Utilization of robotic “remote presence” technology within North American intensive care units. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18:507–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fortis S, Weinert C, Bushinski R, Koehler AG, Beilman G. A health system-based critical care program with a novel tele-ICU: implementation, cost, and structure details. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(4):676–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar S, Merchant S, Reynolds R. Tele-ICU: efficacy and cost-effectiveness approach of remotely managing the critical care. Open Med Inform J. 2013;7:24–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramnath VR, Ho L, Maggio LA, Khazeni N. Centralized monitoring and virtual consultant models of tele-ICU care: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20:936–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ramnath VR, Khazeni N. Centralized monitoring and virtual consultant models of tele-ICU care: a side-by-side review. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(10):962–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kohl BA, Fortino-Mullen M, Praestgaard A, Hanson CW, Dimartino J, Ochroch EA. The effect of ICU telemedicine on mortality and length of stay. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(5):282–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lilly CM, Cody S, Zhao H, et al. Hospital mortality, length of stay and preventable complications among critically ill patients before and after tele-ICU reengineering of critical care processes. JAMA. 2011;305(21):2175–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Franzini L, Sail KR, Thomas EJ, Wueste L. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a tele-ICU program in six intensive care units in a large healthcare system. J Crit Care. 2011;26(3):329.e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilcox ME, Adhikari NKJ. The effect of telemedicine in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2012;16(4):R127.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sadaka F, Palagiri A, Trottier S, Deibert W, Gudmestad D, Sommer SE, Veremakis C. Telemedicine intervention improves ICU outcomes. Crit Care Res Pract. 2013;2013:456389.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar G, Falk DM, Bonello RS, Kahn JM, Perencevich E, Cram P. The costs of critical care telemedicine programs: a systematic review and analysis. Chest. 2013;143(1):19–29.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rogove H, Atkins C, Kramer J. Enhanced access to neurointensivists through a telemedicine program [abstract]. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(Suppl):A1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rincon T, Seiver A, Farrell W, Daly MA. Increased documentation of ICD-9-CM codes 995.92 and 785.52 with template-oriented monitoring and screening by a tele-ICU [abstract]. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(Suppl):A4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yager P, Whalen M, Cummings B, Noviski N. Use of telemedicine to provide enhanced communication between at-home attendings and bedside personnel in a pediatric intensive care unit [abstract]. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:U28.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Romig M, Latif A, Pronovost P, Gill R, Sapirstein A. Perceived benefit of a consultative telemedicine service in a highly staffed intensive care unit [abstract]. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:U27.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Armfield NR, Donovan T, Smith AC. Clinicians’ perceptions of telemedicine for remote neonatal consultation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;161:1–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kowitlawakul Y. The technology acceptance model: predicting nurses’ intention to use telemedicine technology (eICU). Comput Inform Nurs. 2011;29:411–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hoonakker PLT, Carayon P, McGuire K, et al. Motivation and job satisfaction of tele-ICU nurses. J Crit Care. 2013;28:315.e13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Goran SF. Measuring tele-ICU impact: does it optimize quality outcomes for the critically ill patient? J Nurs Manag. 2012;20(3):414–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Young LB, Chan PS, Cram P. Staff acceptance of tele-ICU coverage: a systematic review. Chest. 2011;139:279–88.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hao JF, Cui HM, Han JM, Bai JX, Song X, Cao N. Tele-ICU: the way forward in geriatric care? Aging Clin Exp Res. 2014;26(6):575–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Latifi R, Peck K, Porter JM, Poropatich R, Geare III T, Nassi RB. Telepresence and telemedicine in trauma and emergency care management. In: Establishing telemedicine in developing countries: from inception to implementation. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2004. p. 193–9.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rogers F, Ricci M, Shackford S, Caputo L, Sartorelli K, Dwell J, Day S. The use of telemedicine for real-time video consultation between trauma center and community hospital in a rural setting improves early trauma care. Preliminary results. J Trauma. 2001;51(6):1037–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Marcin JP, Schepps DE, Page KA, Struve SN, Nagrampa E, Dimand RJ. The use of telemedicine to provide pediatric critical care consultations to pediatric trauma patients admitted to a remote trauma intensive care unit: a preliminary report. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004;5:251–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Duchesne JC, Kyle A, Simmons J, Islam S, Schmieg Jr RE, Olivier J, et al. Impact of telemedicine upon rural trauma care. J Trauma. 2008;64:92–7. discussion: 97–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lambrecht CJ. Telemedicine in trauma care: description of 100 trauma teleconsults. Telemed J. 1997;3(4):265–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Latifi R, Hadeed GJ, Rhee P, O’Keeffe T, Friese RS, Wynne JL, et al. Initial experiences and outcomes of telepresence in the management of trauma and emergency surgical patients. Am J Surg. 2009;198:905–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Latifi R, Weinstein RS, Porter JM, Ziemba M, Judkins D, Ridings D, et al. Telemedicine and telepresence for trauma and emergency care management. Scand J Surg. 2007;96:281–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lewis ER, Thomas CA, Wilson ML, Mbarika VWA. Telemedicine in acute-phase injury management: a review of practice and advancements. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18(6):434–45.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ong CA. Telemedicine and wound care. In: Latifi R, editor. Current principles and practices of telemedicine and e-health. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2008. p. 211–25.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Massman NJ, Dodge JD, Fortman KK, Schwartz KJ, Solem LD. Burns follow-up: an innovative application of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 1999;5 Suppl 1:52–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Saffle JR, et al. Telemedicine evaluation of acute burns is accurate and cost-effective. J Trauma. 2009;67:358–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Saffle JR. Telemedicine for acute burn treatment: the time has come. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yoder LH, McFall DC, Cancio LC. Use of the videophone to collect quality of life data from burn patients. Int J Burns Trauma. 2012;2(3):135–44.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Knoblich K, Rennekampff HO, Vogt PM. Cell-phone based multimedia messaging service (MMS) and burn injuries. Burns. 2009;35:1191–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Smith AC, Kimble R, Mill J, Bailey D, O’Rourke P, Wootton R. Diagnostic accuracy of and patient satisfaction with telemedicine for the follow-up of paediatric burns patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10:193–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rifat Latifi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Latifi, R. (2015). Telemedicine for Trauma and Intensive Care: Changing the Paradigm of Telepresence. In: Latifi, R., Rhee, P., Gruessner, R. (eds) Technological Advances in Surgery, Trauma and Critical Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2671-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2671-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2670-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2671-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics