Abstract
Fires in buildings and other structures are distinguished from outdoor fires by the confinement effects associated with enclosure boundaries and by the ventilation effects associated with openings in these boundaries. The confinement of heat and smoke released by a fire in an enclosure gives rise to the evolution of fire-generated environmental conditions that can threaten life safety and cause thermal and nonthermal damage to the structure and its contents. For performance-based building fire safety analysis and design, it is important to be able to calculate the environmental conditions generated by fires in enclosures in order to evaluate the threat levels posed by anticipated fire scenarios. This chapter addresses the enclosure smoke-filling process and the fire-generated environmental conditions that develop within an enclosure during this process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
E.E. Zukoski, “Development of a Stratified Ceiling Layer in the Early Stages of a Closed-Room Fire,” Fire and Materials, 2, pp. 54–62 (1978).
L.Y. Cooper, “A Mathematical Model for Estimating Available Safe Egress Time from Fires,” Fire and Materials, 6, pp. 135–143 (1982).
L.Y. Cooper, “The Development of Hazardous Conditions in Enclosures with Growing Fires,” Combustion Science and Technology, 33, pp. 279–297 (1983).
W.D. Walton, “ASET-B: A Room Fire Program for Personal Computers,” Fire Technology, 21, pp. 293–309 (1985).
H.E. Nelson, “FPETOOL: Fire Protection Engineering Tools for Hazard Estimation,” NISTIR 4380, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, General Services Administration, Washington, DC (Oct. 1990).
M. Hurley, “ASET-B: Comparison of Model Predictions with Full-Scale Test Data,” Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 13, 1, pp. 37–65 (2003).
F.W. Mowrer, “Methods of Quantitative Fire Hazard Analysis,” TR-100443, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA (May 1992).
Professional Loss Control, “Fire Induced Vulnerability Evaluation (FIVE),” TR-100370, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA (Apr. 1992).
J.A. Milke and F.W. Mowrer, “A Design Algorithm for Smoke Management Systems in Atria and Covered Malls,” Report No. FP93–04, Department of Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland (May 1993).
NFPA 92B, Standard for Smoke Management Systems in Malls, Atria, and Large Spaces, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA (2005).
F.W. Mowrer, “Enclosure Smoke Filling Revisited,” Fire Safety Journal, 33, pp. 93–114 (1999).
F.W. Mowrer, “Enclosure Smoke Filling and Management with Mechanical Ventilation,” Fire Technology, 38, 1, January pp. 33–56 (2002).
K. Matsuyama, Y. Misawa, T. Wakamatsu, and K. Hamada, “Closed-Form Equations for Room Smoke Filling During an Initial Fire,” Fire Science and Technology, 19, pp. 1–27 (1999).
M.A. Delichatsios, “Closed Form Approximate Solutions for Smoke Filling in Enclosures Including the Volume Expansion Term,” Fire Safety Journal, 38, pp. 97–101 (2003).
M.A. Delichatsios, “Tenability Conditions and Filling Times for Fires in Large Spaces,” Fire Safety Journal, 24, pp. 643–662 (2004).
C.M. Fleischmann and K.B. McGrattan, “Numerical and Experimental Gravity Currents Related to Backdrafts,” Fire Safety Journal, 33, 1, pp. 21–34 (1999).
S.P. Nowlen, “Enclosure Environment Characterization Testing for the Base Line Validation of Computer Fire Simulation Codes,” NUREG/CR-4681, SAND86–1296, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (Mar. 1987).
R. Zalosh, “Explosion Protection,” in SFPE Fire Protection Handbook (P.J. DiNenno et al., eds.), National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, pp. 3-402–3-421 (2003).
M. Skelly, R. Roby, and C. Beyler, “An Experimental Investigation of Glass Breakage in Compartment Fires,” Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 3, 1, pp. 25–34 (1991).
P.E. Sincaglia and J.R. Barnett, “Development of a Glass Window Fracture Model for Zone-Type Computer Fire Codes,” Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 8, 3, pp. 101–118 (1997).
F.W. Mowrer, “Window Breakage Induced by Exterior Fires,” NIST GCR 98–751, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (1998).
J.D. Seader and I.N. Einhorn, “Some Physical, Chemical, Toxicological, and Physiological Aspects of Fire Smokes,” in 16th Symposium (International) on Combustion, Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 1423–1445 (1977).
G.W. Muholland and C. Croarkin, “Specific Extinction Coefficient of Flame Generated Smoke,” Fire and Materials, 24, 5, pp. 39–55 (2000).
G. W. Mulholland, "Smoke Production and Properties," SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2008.
E.E. Zukoski, T. Kubota, and B. Cetegen, “Entrainment in Fire Plumes,” Fire Safety Journal, 3, pp. 107–121 (1980/1981).
V. Ho, N. Siu, and G. Apostolakis, “COMPBRN III—A Fire Hazard Model for Risk Analysis,” Fire Safety Journal, 13, pp. 137–154 (1988).
K.L. Foote, P.J. Pagni, and N.J. Alvares, “Temperature Correlations for Forced-Ventilation Compartment Fires,” Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the First International Symposium, International Association for Fire Safety Science, London, UK (1986).
C. Beyler, “Analysis of Compartment Fires with Overhead Forced Ventilation,” Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the Third International Symposium, International Association for Fire Safety Science, London, UK (1991).
C.L. Beyler, “Fire Plumes and Ceiling Jets,” Fire Safety Journal, 11, 53, pp. 53–75 (1986).
J.G. Quintiere and B.S. Grove, “Correlations for Fire Plumes,” NIST GCR 98–744, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (1998).
P.S. Ziesler, F.S. Gunnerson, and S.K. Williams, “Advances in Positive Pressure Ventilation: Live Fire Tests and Laboratory Simulation,” Fire Technology, 30, 2, pp. 269–277 (1994).
S. Kerber and W.D. Walton, “Full-Scale Evaluation of Positive Pressure Ventilation In a Fire Fighter Training Building,” NISTIR 7342 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (2006).
J.H. Ferziger and M. Peric, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 3rd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York (2002).
B. Hagglund, R. Jansson, and K. Nireus. “Smoke Filling Experiments in a 6 × 6 × 6 Meter Enclosure,” FOA Report C 20585-D6, National Defense Research Establishment, Stockholm, Sweden (1985).
B. Karlsson and J. Quintiere, Enclosure Fire Dynamics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2000).
T. Yamana and T. Tanaka, “Smoke Control in Large Scale Spaces (Part 2: Smoke Control Experiments in a Large Scale Space),” Fire Science and Technology, 5, 1, pp. 41–54 (1985).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Nomenclature
- A
-
area (m2)
- c p
-
specific heat at constant pressure (kJ/kg · K)
- c v
-
specific heat at constant volume (kJ/kg · K)
- C d
-
orifice flow coefficient (–)
- \( d{m}_{{\mathrm{O}}_2} \)
-
mass of oxygen consumed by combustion (kg)
- h
-
specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)
- H
-
height of space from floor to ceiling (m)
- k v
-
volumetric entrainment coefficient (m3/s · kW1/3 · m5/3)
- m
-
mass (kg)
- ṁ
-
mass flow rate (kg/s)
- P
-
pressure (Pa)
- P o
-
atmospheric pressure (101,325 Pa)
- Q f
-
heat released by combustion (kJ)
- \( \dot{Q} \)
-
heat release rate (kW)
- Q*
-
dimensionless heat release rate—\( \dot{Q}/\left({\rho}_a{c}_p{T}_a\sqrt{gH}{H}^2\right) \)
- r air
-
air stoichiometric ratio (kg air/kg fuel)
- \( {r}_{{\mathrm{O}}_2} \)
-
oxygen stoichiometric ratio (kg oxygen/kg fuel)
- R
-
ideal gas constant of air (287.0 J/kg · K)
- t
-
time (s)
- T
-
temperature (K or °C)
- u
-
specific internal energy (kJ/kg)
- U
-
total internal energy (kJ)
- v
-
velocity (m/s)
- V
-
volume (m3)
- \( \dot{V} \)
-
volumetric flow rate (m3/s)
- X i
-
mole fraction of species i (n i /n total) (moles i /molestotal)
- Y i
-
mass fraction of species i (m i /m total) (kg i /kgtotal)
- z
-
elevation variable (m)
Greek Letters
- α n
-
power law fire growth coefficient (kW/sn)
- χ l
-
heat loss factor \( \left({\dot{Q}}_l/{\dot{Q}}_f\right) \) (–)
- \( {\chi}_{{\mathrm{O}}_2} \)
-
oxygen consumption fraction (–)
- ΔH c
-
fuel heat of combustion (kJ/kg)
- ΔT
-
temperature rise above ambient (K or °C)
- ρ
-
density (kg/m3)
- τ
-
time constant (s)
Subscripts
- atm
-
atmospheric
- c
-
convective
- e
-
exit
- exp
-
expansion
- ext
-
extraction
- f
-
fire
- g
-
global
- i
-
in, interface
- l
-
loss, lower layer
- net
-
net
- o
-
ambient, reference
- O2
-
oxygen
- p
-
constant pressure
- pl
-
plume
- r
-
radiative
- s
-
space
- tot
-
total
- u, ul
-
upper layer
- v
-
constant volume
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Society of Fire Protection Engineers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mowrer, F.W. (2016). Enclosure Smoke Filling and Fire-Generated Environmental Conditions. In: Hurley, M.J., et al. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_33
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2564-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2565-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)