Abstract
In Case 2, you learned to always consider the multiple causes that can change a clinical outcome. In the end in Case 2, there were no results to write about. So what would you do when faced with this dilemma? Give up or start again?
We redesigned the study and took into account all the points mentioned in solution made in Case 2. After many months, we reviewed the findings. Two hundred and twelve patients had been enrolled successfully. But we had to exclude a total of 116 patients.
Why were these 116 cases excluded?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brock-Utne, J.G. (2015). Case 3: Why Were 116 Patients Excluded?. In: Clinical Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2516-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2516-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2515-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2516-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)