Skip to main content

Abstract

Wireless Sensors Networks are indispensable for applications whereby data needs to be sensed and transmitted from unfriendly terrains e.g., planets' surfaces.

The inherent ad-hoc nature of WSNs, whereby no topology can be defined in advance, imposes challenges to Routing. Sensor nodes have to detect each other and build an ad-hoc topology with specific gateways (e.g., sinks) that forward data to the control plane.

In this chapter, we present a deployment topology for WSNs in space applications, and delineate the challenges towards an optimal routing protocol that accounts basically for energy efficiency, self-organization, self-adaptation, and the use of multiple gateways. The latter disseminate data towards the control plane. In this context different WSNs routing protocols are surveyed and relevant trade-offs are presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akyildiz I, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y, Cayirci E (2002) Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput Netw 38(4):393–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. IETF, Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group. http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/manet/charter/. Accessed Jan 2015

  3. Conti M, Giordano S (2007) Multihop ad hoc networking: the theory. IEEE Commun Mag 45(4):78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Conti M, Giordano S (2007) Multihop ad hoc networking: the reality. IEEE Commun Mag 45(4):88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Satyajayant M, Guoliang X, Dejun Y (2012) Smart grid – the new and improved power grid: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 14(4):Fourth Quarter

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gungor VC, Sahin D, Koçak T, Ergüt S, Buccella C, Cecati C, Hancke GP (2011) Smart Grid Technologies: communication technologies and standards. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 7(4):529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The internet of things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Perkins CE, Royer EM (1999) Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In: WMCSA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heinzelman W, Chandrakasan A, Balakrishnan H (2000) Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS’00), January 2000

    Google Scholar 

  10. Loscri V, Morabito G, Marano S (2005) A two levels hierarchy for low energy adaptive clustering hierarchy (TL-LEACH). In: Proc. IEEE 62nd vehicular technology conference

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen J, Shen H (2008) MELEACH-L: more energy-efficient LEACH for large-scale WSNs. In: Proceedings of 2008 4th international conference on wireless communications on networking and mobile computing, Dalian, October 2008, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen J, Shen H (2007) MELEACH an energy-efficient routing protocol for WSNs. Chin J Sens Actuators 20:2089–2094

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manjeshwar A, Agarwal DP (2001) TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In: First international workshop on parallel and distributed computing issues in wireless networks and mobile computing

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manjeshwar A, Agarwal DP (2002) APTEEN: a hybrid protocol for efficient routing and comprehensive information retrieval in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 16th international parallel and distributed processing symposium, pp 195–202

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ye M, Li C, Chen G, Wu J (2005) EECS: an energy efficient clustering scheme in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 24th IEEE international performance, computing, and communications conference (IPCCC), Phoenix, AZ, USA, 7–9 April 2005, pp 535–540

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ye M, Li C, Chen G, Wu J (2006) An energy efficient clustering scheme in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Sens Wireless Netw 3:99–119

    Google Scholar 

  17. Younis O, Fahmy S (2004) HEED: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad-hoc sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 3:366–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindsey S, Raghavendra C (2002) PEGASIS: power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems. IEEE Aerospace Conf Proc 3(9–16):1125–1130

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chang R, Kuo C (2006) An energy efficient routing mechanism for wireless sensor networks (MECH). In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on advanced information networking and applications, vol 2. April 2006

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li Q, Aslam J, Rus D (2001) Hierarchical power-aware routing in sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the DIMACS workshop on pervasive networking, May 2001

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shin K, Song J, Kim J, Yu M, Mah P (2007) Reliable aware routing protocol for wireless sensor networks (REAR). In: 9th international conference on advanced communication technology, February 2007

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yu Y, Estrin D, Govindan R (2001) Geographical and energy-aware routing: a recursive data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: UCLA Computer Science Department Technical Report, UCLA-CSD TR-01-0023, May 2001

    Google Scholar 

  23. Watanabe M, Higaki H (2007) No-beacon GEDIR: location-based ad-hoc routing with less communication overhead. In: Fourth international conference on information technology (ITNG’07), 2–4 April 2007, pp 48–55

    Google Scholar 

  24. Takehira T, Higaki H (2012) IRDT-GEDIR: shorter delay wireless multihop routing in sensor networks. In: 4th international congress on ultra-modern telecommunications and control systems and workshops (ICUMT), 3–5 October 2012, pp 857–863

    Google Scholar 

  25. Takehira T, Higaki H (2012) IRDT-GEDIR: next-hop selection in intermittent wireless multihop sensor networks. In: 9th international conference on ubiquitous intelligence & computing and 9th international conference on autonomic & trusted computing (UIC/ATC), 4–7 September 2012, pp 894–899

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fu B, Xiao Y, Deng H, Zeng H (2014) A survey of cross-layer designs in wireless networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 16(1):110–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gunasekaran R, Hairong Q (2008) XLRP: cross layer routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), March 31–April 3, 2008, pp 2135–2140

    Google Scholar 

  28. Camillò A, Nati M, Petrioli C, Rossi M, Zorzi M (2013) IRIS: integrated data gathering and interest dissemination system for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw 11(2):654–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Camillo A, Petrioli C (2012) Hands on IRIS: lessons learned from implementing a cross layer protocol stack for WSNs. In: Proceedings of IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nakano T, Suda T (2005) Self-organizing network services with evolutionary adaptation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 16(5):1269–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chun Y, LeiMinga X, MeiLin S (1999) Hierarchical on-demand routing for self-organized networks. In: Fifth Asia-pacific conference on communications and fourth optoelectronics and communications conference, October 1999

    Google Scholar 

  32. Markham A, Wilkinson A (2006) The adaptive social hierarchy – a self organizing network based on naturally occurring structures. In: 1st bio-inspired models of network, information and computer systems, December 2006

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bernal Velazquez CF, Benhaddou D, Balakrishnan M, Anan M (2011) Energy efficient data dissemination in wireless sensor networks based on natural selection. In: 7th international in wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC), 4–8 July 2011, pp 577–582

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jaradat T, Benhaddou D, Balakrishnan M, Al-fuqaha A (2013) Energy efficient cross-layer routing protocol in wireless sensor networks based on fuzzy logic. In: 9th international wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC), 1–5 July 2013, pp 177–182

    Google Scholar 

  35. Benhaddou D, Balakrishnan M, Yuan X, Chen J, Rungta M, Barton R, Yang H (2009) “Wireless Sensor Networks for Space Applications: Network Architecture and Protocol Enhancements,” in Sensors and Transducers journal Vol.7, Special Issue “MEMS: From Micro Devices to Wireless Systems”, pp. 203–212

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Riduan Abid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abid, M.R., Benhaddou, D. (2015). Routing in WSNs for Space Application. In: Benhaddou, D., Al-Fuqaha, A. (eds) Wireless Sensor and Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2468-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2468-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2467-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2468-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics