Skip to main content

Indications and Techniques for Trauma Laparotomy

  • Chapter
The Shock Trauma Manual of Operative Techniques
  • 2041 Accesses

Abstract

A critical component of the evaluation of an injured patient is assessment for the presence of intra-abdominal injuries. If such injuries are identified or suspected, then a decision must be made as to whether operative exploration is indicated. While there are general guidelines, and a few absolute rules, in general the decision to proceed with laparotomy is dependent on multiple considerations, including mechanism of injury, physical examination, response to resuscitation, and results of lab tests and imaging. The goal is the rapid diagnosis and operative management of intra-abdominal injuries, to avoid missed injuries, but limit unnecessary diagnostic testing, delays, and nontherapeutic laparotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shaftan GW. Indications for operation in abdominal trauma. Am J Surg. 1960;99:657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nance FC, Wennar MH, et al. Surgical judgment in the management of penetrating wounds of the abdomen: experience in 2212 patients. Ann Surg. 1974;179:639.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Demetriades D, Rabinowitz B. Indications for operation in abdominal stab wounds. Ann Surg. 1987;123:1141.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shorr RM, Gottlieb MM, et al. Selective management of abdominal stab wounds. Arch Surg. 1988;123:1141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, et al. A selective approach to the management of gunshot wounds of the back. Am J Surg. 1997;174:342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Demetriades D, Velmahos GC, et al. Selective nonoperative management of gunshot wounds of the anterior abdomen. Arch Surg. 1997;132:178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, et al. Selective non-operative management in 1856 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds: should routine laparotomy still be the standard of care? Ann Surg. 2001;234:395.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, et al. “Damage control”: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma. 2003;55:1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Demetriades D, Gomez H, et al. Gunshot injuries to the liver: the role of selective nonoperative management. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188:343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Himmelman RG, Martin M, et al. Triple-contrast CT scans in penetrating back and flank trauma. J Trauma. 1991;31:852.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, et al. Nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury: use of CT criteria to select patients for splenic arteriography and potential endovascular therapy. Radiology. 2000;217:75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Poletti PA, Mirvis SE, et al. CT criteria for management of blunt liver trauma: correlation with angiographic and surgical findings. Radiology. 2000;216:418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fakhry S, Watts D, et al. Diagnosing blunt small bowel injury (SBI): an analysis of the clinical utility of computerized tomography (CT) scan from a large multi-institutional trial. J Trauma. 2001;51:1232.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Livingston DH, Lavery RF, et al. Free fluid on abdominal computed tomography without solid organ injury after blunt abdominal injury does not mandate celiotomy. Am J Surg. 2001;182:6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bradley MJ, Dubose JJ, Scalea TM, et al. Independent predictors of enteric fistula and abdominal sepsis after damage control laparotomy: results from the prospective AAST open abdomen registry. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:947.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shah, P.K. (2015). Indications and Techniques for Trauma Laparotomy. In: Scalea, T. (eds) The Shock Trauma Manual of Operative Techniques. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2371-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2371-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2370-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2371-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics