Abstract
A critical component of the evaluation of an injured patient is assessment for the presence of intra-abdominal injuries. If such injuries are identified or suspected, then a decision must be made as to whether operative exploration is indicated. While there are general guidelines, and a few absolute rules, in general the decision to proceed with laparotomy is dependent on multiple considerations, including mechanism of injury, physical examination, response to resuscitation, and results of lab tests and imaging. The goal is the rapid diagnosis and operative management of intra-abdominal injuries, to avoid missed injuries, but limit unnecessary diagnostic testing, delays, and nontherapeutic laparotomy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Shaftan GW. Indications for operation in abdominal trauma. Am J Surg. 1960;99:657.
Nance FC, Wennar MH, et al. Surgical judgment in the management of penetrating wounds of the abdomen: experience in 2212 patients. Ann Surg. 1974;179:639.
Demetriades D, Rabinowitz B. Indications for operation in abdominal stab wounds. Ann Surg. 1987;123:1141.
Shorr RM, Gottlieb MM, et al. Selective management of abdominal stab wounds. Arch Surg. 1988;123:1141.
Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, et al. A selective approach to the management of gunshot wounds of the back. Am J Surg. 1997;174:342.
Demetriades D, Velmahos GC, et al. Selective nonoperative management of gunshot wounds of the anterior abdomen. Arch Surg. 1997;132:178.
Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, et al. Selective non-operative management in 1856 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds: should routine laparotomy still be the standard of care? Ann Surg. 2001;234:395.
Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, et al. “Damage control”: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma. 2003;55:1095.
Demetriades D, Gomez H, et al. Gunshot injuries to the liver: the role of selective nonoperative management. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188:343.
Himmelman RG, Martin M, et al. Triple-contrast CT scans in penetrating back and flank trauma. J Trauma. 1991;31:852.
Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, et al. Nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury: use of CT criteria to select patients for splenic arteriography and potential endovascular therapy. Radiology. 2000;217:75.
Poletti PA, Mirvis SE, et al. CT criteria for management of blunt liver trauma: correlation with angiographic and surgical findings. Radiology. 2000;216:418.
Fakhry S, Watts D, et al. Diagnosing blunt small bowel injury (SBI): an analysis of the clinical utility of computerized tomography (CT) scan from a large multi-institutional trial. J Trauma. 2001;51:1232.
Livingston DH, Lavery RF, et al. Free fluid on abdominal computed tomography without solid organ injury after blunt abdominal injury does not mandate celiotomy. Am J Surg. 2001;182:6.
Bradley MJ, Dubose JJ, Scalea TM, et al. Independent predictors of enteric fistula and abdominal sepsis after damage control laparotomy: results from the prospective AAST open abdomen registry. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:947.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shah, P.K. (2015). Indications and Techniques for Trauma Laparotomy. In: Scalea, T. (eds) The Shock Trauma Manual of Operative Techniques. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2371-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2371-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2370-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2371-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)