Abstract
Historically, surgical pathology reports have been manually transcribed following dictation. More recently, voice recognition technology has been employed with or without the use of templates for common specimens. Required cancer reporting protocols are often combined with both manual transcription and voice recognition technology approaches. Errors observed in both approaches are discussed. Concurrently, there has been an evolution from manual/paper pathology report distribution into the patient’s physical chart to inclusion of the report in the patient’s comprehensive electronic health record. Data that crosses an electronic interface between a laboratory information system and an electronic health record is subject to loss of fidelity or formatting alterations which may render a final product different from what the pathologist originally intended. Inclusion of diagrams and/or photomicrographs with surgical pathology reports is possible in some systems, but can add a layer of complexity to successful electronic report distribution. Finally, some thought must be applied to the distribution of information within an individual pathology report for maximum interpretability. This chapter discusses errors that can arise in the transcription and distribution of diagnostic data in pathology reports. Strategies for assessment and prevention of these errors in real practice situations are provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Forsman RW. Why is the laboratory an afterthought for managed care organizations? Clin Chem. 1996;42(5):813–6.
Malami SA, Iliyasu Y. Local audit of diagnostic surgical pathology as a tool for quality assurance. Niger J Med. 2008;17(2):186–90.
Zardawi IM, et al. Internal quality assurance activities of a surgical pathology department in an Australian teaching hospital. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51(9):695–9.
Troxel DB. Error in surgical pathology. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(8):1092–5.
Paxton A. Bringing down defects in surgical pathology reports. CAP Today. 2012. http://www.captodayonline.com/Archives/0512/0512d_bringing_down.html.
Raab SS, Nakhleh RE, Ruby SG. Patient safety in anatomic pathology: measuring discrepancy frequencies and causes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129(4):459–66.
Meier FA, et al. Amended reports: development and validation of a taxonomy of defects. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130(2):238–46.
Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2000 (xxi, 287 p).
Nieva VF, Sorra J. Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(Suppl 2):ii17–23.
Resar RK, Rozich JD, Classen D. Methodology and rationale for the measurement of harm with trigger tools. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(Suppl 2):ii39–45.
Davis Giardina T, et al. Patient access to medical records and healthcare outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(4):737–41.
Nakhleh RE. Patient safety and error reduction in surgical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008; 132(2):181–5.
Alwang G, S.C. Speech recognition: finding its voice., in PC Mag. 1998. p. 191–8.
Pezzullo JA, et al. Voice recognition dictation: radiologist as transcriptionist. J Digit Imaging. 2008;21(4):384–9.
Strahan RH, Schneider-Kolsky ME. Voice recognition versus transcriptionist: error rates and productivity in MRI reporting. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2010;54(5):411–4.
Al-Aynati MM, Chorneyko KA. Comparison of voice-automated transcription and human transcription in generating pathology reports. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127(6):721–5.
Henricks WH, et al. The utility and cost effectiveness of voice recognition technology in surgical pathology. Mod Pathol. 2002;15(5):565–71.
Kang HP, et al. Experience with voice recognition in surgical pathology at a large academic multi-institutional center. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133(1):156–9.
Singh M, Pal TR. Voice recognition technology implementation in surgical pathology: advantages and limitations. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135(11):1476–81.
Nakhleh RE, Zarbo RJ. Amended reports in surgical pathology and implications for diagnostic error detection and avoidance: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,667,547 accessioned cases in 359 laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998;122(4):303–9.
Panackal AA, et al. Automatic electronic laboratory-based reporting of notifiable infectious diseases at a large health system. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8(7):685–91.
Barcellos-Hoff MH, et al. Functional differentiation and alveolar morphogenesis of primary mammary cultures on reconstituted basement membrane. Development. 1989;105:223–35.
Cowan DF, Gray RZ, Campbell B. Validation of the laboratory information system. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998;122(3):239–44.
Ruby SG. Clinician interpretation of pathology reports: confusion or comprehension? Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124(7):943–4.
Powsner SM, Costa J, Homer RJ. Clinicians are from Mars and pathologists are from Venus. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124(7):1040–6.
Valenstein PN. Formatting pathology reports: applying four design principles to improve communication and patient safety. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132(1):84–94.
Strobel SL, Tatchell T. The surgical pathology report as an educational tool for cancer patients. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2002;32(4):363–8.
Miller GA. The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956;63(2):81–97.
Nakhleh RE. What is quality in surgical pathology? J Clin Pathol. 2006;59(7):669–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCall, S. (2015). Error Prevention in Transcription and Report Distribution. In: Nakhleh, R. (eds) Error Reduction and Prevention in Surgical Pathology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2339-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2339-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2338-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2339-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)