Abstract
Some of the best medical care in the world is available in the USA, yet there is growing evidence that our delivery of high-value clinically coordinated care is below the standards of many other countries. The progress of quality improvement in the USA dates back to the early twentieth century, but it accelerated in the 1960s and 1970s with the work of Avedis Donabedian and others. Our current quality improvement initiatives have been organized within the National Quality Agenda that is part of the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The National Quality Forum, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS), and the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality are leaders in developing quality measures, validating their impact, and facilitating implementation. Gastroenterology societies including the American Gastroenterological Association, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have built programs available to practicing clinicians to help practices enhance their patient care and demonstrate quality in the services we provide patients. It is clear from recent and emerging legislation that CMS is leading the way away from a fee for service reimbursement methodology to one based on demonstrated quality. This concept will change our focus from solely one of quality to a focus on “value” where value refers to quality health outcomes per unit cost. Incorporation of the financial consequences of our medical care and moving toward increasing provider, practice and health system accountability will inevitably alter the way medical care is delivered in the USA. These and other concepts are outlined in detail in this and other chapters of this book. Gastroenterologists who understand the value equation and can link that to their practice strategy will become valued partners for the large consolidating health systems we are witnessing and to the insurance companies that are slowly but surely narrowing their provider networks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Murray CJL, Abraham J, Mohammed KA, Alvarado M, et al. (US Burden of Disease Collaborators). The state of US Health, 1990–2010 burden of diseases, injuries and risk factors. JAMA. 2013;310:591–608.
Framework for a high performance health system for the United States. The Commonwealth Fund. August 2006. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/Files/Publications/Fund%20Report/2006/Aug/Framework%20for%20a%20High%20Performance%20Health%20System%20for%20the%20United%20States/Commission_framework_high_performance_943%20pdf.pdf. Accessed 9 Apr 2014.
Shih A, Davis K, Schoenbaum SC, Gauthier A, Nuzum R, McCarthy D. Organizing the US Health Care Delivery system for high performance. The Commonwealth Fund. August 2008. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/Files/Publications/Fund%20Report/2008/Aug/Organizing%20the%20U%20S%20%20Health%20Care%20Delivery%20System%20for%20High%20Performance/Shih_organizingushltcaredeliverysys_1155%20pdf.pdf. Accessed 9 Apr 2014.
Collins SR, Shoen C, Davis K, Gauthier AK, Schoenbaum SC. A roadmap to health insurance for all: principles for reform. The Commonwealth Fund. October 2007. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/Files/Publications/Fund%20Report/2007/Oct/A%20Roadmap%20to%20Health%20Insurance%20for%20All%20%20Principles%20for%20Reform/Collins_roadmaphltinsforall_1066%20pdf.pdf. Accessed 9 Apr 2014.
Brand RA. Ernest Amory Codman, MD, 1869–1940. Clin Orthop. 2009;467:2763–65.
Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q. 2005;83:691–729.
National Research Council. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). The learning healthcare system: workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
Berwick DM, James B, Coye MJ. Connections between quality measurement and improvement. Med Care. 2003;41:130–8.
Kaye DR, Berenson RA. Grading a physician’s value—the misapplication of performance measurement. NEJM. 2013;369:2079–81.
US Department of Health and Human Services. 2012 Annual progress report to congress: national strategy for quality improvement in health care. 2012. http://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/nqs/nqs2012annlrpt.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2014.
National Quality Forum. MAP 2014 recommendations on measures for more than 20 federal programs (final report January 2014). National Quality Forum. 2014. https://www.qualityforum.org/Setting_Priorities/Partnership/Measure_Applications_Partnership.aspx. Accessed 10 Apr 2014.
Brill JV, Jain R, Margolis PS, Kosinski LR et al. A bundled payment framework for colonoscopy performed for colorectal cancer screening or surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:849–53.
Allen JI. Gastroenterologists and the triple aim: how to become accountable. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2012;22:85–96.
Allen JI. Maximizing the value of colonoscopy in community practice. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20:771–81.
Kappleman MD, Dorn SD, Peterson E, Runge T, Allen JI. Quality of care for gastrointestinal conditions: a primer for gastroenterologists. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1182–7.
Allen JI. Quality assurance for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012;28:442–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allen, J. (2015). History and Overview of the National Quality Strategy. In: Shaukat, A., Allen, J. (eds) Colorectal Cancer Screening. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2333-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2333-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2332-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2333-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)