Skip to main content

Police Integrity in Slovenia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Measuring Police Integrity Across the World

Abstract

Slovenia is a Central European democracy, independent since 1991. With a population of approximately two million and above 17,000 € gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, it is considered to be quite a successful transitional country from a former socialist republic to a functional democracy. The Slovenian police service employs 8808 personnel, one police officer for every 267 inhabitants. The survey, conducted in spring 2011 on a representative sample of 550 Slovenian police officers, provides an in-depth exploration of police integrity among Slovenian police officers after two decades of Slovene independence and 13 years after the first survey on police integrity with the same methodology was performed. The survey analyzes police integrity from the organizational/occupational culture theory of corrupt behavior perspective. The questionnaire, developed by Klockars and colleagues, consists of 14 hypothetical case scenarios. One of the main findings is that the officers’ own perception of the seriousness of corruption was the most significant determinate of their willingness to report corruption. Expected discipline had no influence on willingness to report corruption. We believe that these results demonstrate a high level of police integrity among police officers in Slovenia. Nevertheless, our results also contain some evidence of the code of silence among the Slovenian police officers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The conclusions are based on the results of public opinion surveys conducted regularly by the Centre for Research of Public Opinion at the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, which included questions related to the police such as “How much do you trust the police?” and “How satisfied are you with the performance of the police?” (Toš 1999, 2004).

  2. 2.

    More information about the Slovenian police is available at http://www.policija.si/eng/index.php/publication.

  3. 3.

    Accessible only in Slovene version at www.policija.si: http://www.policija.si/images/stories/KatalogInformacijJavnegaZnacaja/PDF/akti/program_protikorupciji.pdf.

  4. 4.

    Police annual report for 2011: http://www.policija.si/images/stories/Statistika/LetnaPorocila/PDF/LetnoPorocilo2011.pdf.

  5. 5.

    In 2011, 627 complaints against police officers were addressed: http://www.policija.si/images/stories/Statistika/LetnaPorocila/PDF/LetnoPorocilo2011.pdf.

  6. 6.

    Commission for the Prevention of Corruption since 2002 runs annual public surveys on corruption (Stališča o korupciji). Retrieved August 15, 2012 from http://www.kpk-rs.si/index.php?id=48.

  7. 7.

    http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi.

  8. 8.

    In 2003, it reached a score of 5.9 (occupying the 29th place) and 6.7 in 2008 (occupying the 26th place). In 2009, it reached 6.6; in 2010, 6.4; and in 2011, 5.9.

  9. 9.

    The Commission prepares a document called opinion of principle, where simply identifying and reviewing corruptive practices and does not evaluate criminal or other liabilities of the individual, but is assessing the actions of individuals to see if they meet the criteria, conditions, and definition of corruption, as defined in article 4 of IPCA. Opinions of principle are based on actual cases and reports (Škrbec and DobovŠek 2012).

  10. 10.

    We should remind the readers that one opinion of principle may contain several conducts of corruptive practices. The opinion of principle 219 deals with four different conducts of corruptive practices and several perpetrators, so that their number is not equal to the number of opinions of principle, where corruption has been detected.

  11. 11.

    http://www.kpk-rs.si/sl/nadzor-in-preiskave/odlocitve-in-mnenja-komisije.

  12. 12.

    The list of CPOs was obtained from police internet homepage: http://www.policija.si/index.php/dravljani-in-policija/vodje-policijskih-okoliev.

  13. 13.

    Following the precedent established in prior work (Klockars et al. 2006, p. 26), it can be considered only the differences of 0.50 or larger to be meaningful.

References

  • Banutai, E., Šifrer, J., & Meško, G. (2011). Deviance and police organisational culture in Slovenia. In G. Meško, A. Sotlar, & J. Winterdyk (Eds.), Policing in central and Eastern Europe—Social control of unconventional deviance: Conference proceedings (pp. 379–400). Ljubljana: Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. E. (1998). Integrity in organizations: Beyond honesty and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code of Police Ethics (2008). http://www.policija.si/eng/images/stories/Publications/Kodeks.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2015.

  • Delattre, E. J. (1996). Character and cops: Ethics in policing (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: The AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobovšek, B., & Škrbec, J. (2012). Corruption prevention model in the Republic of Slovenia. Cah. politiestudies, 3(24), 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girodo, M. (2003). Evaluating risk behavior and strategic systems: new tools for preventing corruption and strengthening integrity. In M. Pagon et al. (Ed.), Ethics, integrity and human rights from the perspective of police activity. Ljubljana: College of Police and Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Republic of Slovenia. (2012). About Slovenia. http://www.vlada.si/en/about_slovenia/.

  • Hren, B. (2011). Slovenija po dohodkovni (ne)enakosti še v socializmu [Slovenia regarding the income (in)equality still in socialism]. Dnevnik, March 12 2011. http://dnevnik.si/objektiv/vec_vsebin/1042430243.

  • Klemenčič, G., Kečanović, B., & Žaberl, M. (2002). Vaše pravice v policijskih postopkih [Citizens Rights in Police Proceedings]. Ljubljana: Pasadena Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klockars, C. B. & Kutnjak Ivković, S. (2004). Measuring police integrity. In A. R. Piquero, J. R. Greene, & M. J. Hickman (Eds.), Police integrity and ethics. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivković, S. K., Harver, W. E., & Haberfeld, M. R. (2000). The Measurement of Police integrity. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice, Research in Brief.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivković, S. K., & Haberfeld, M. R. (2004). The contours of police integrity. Washington, D.C.: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Haberfeld, M. R. (2006). Enhancing police integrity. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolenc, T. (2003). The Slovene police. Ljubljana: Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Slovenia, Police, General Police Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S. (2009). The Croatian police, police integrity, and transition toward democratic policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 32(3), 459–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S., & O’Connor Shelley, T. (2005). The Bosnian police and police integrity: A continuing story. European Journal of Criminology, 2(4), 428–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S., & O’Connor Shelley, T. (2007). Police integrity and the Czech police officers. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 31(1), 21–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S., Klockars, C. B., Lobnikar, B., & Pagon, M. (2000). Police integrity and the code of silence: The case of the Slovenian police force. In G. Meško et al. (Eds.), Corruption in central and Eastern Europe at the turn of millennium (pp. 85–102). Ljubljana: Open Society Institute Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobnikar, B., Pagon, M., Duffy, M. K., & Ganster, D. C. (2000). Dejavniki deviantnega vedenja slovenskih policistov [Factors of police deviance]. Organizacija: revija za management, informatiko in kadre, 33(2), 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobnikar, B., Pagon, M., & Ovsenik, M. (2004). The frequency and the causes of violence and aggressive behavior at the workplace: The case of Slovenian police. Organizacija: revija za management, informatiko in kadre, 37(6), 371–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobnikar, B., Koporec, A., & Šumi, R. (2006). Evaluation of police officer integrity training. Varstvoslovje: revija za teorijo in prakso varstvoslovja, 8(3/4), 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meško, G. (2000). Introduction. In G. Meško et al. (Eds.), Corruption in central and Eastern Europe at the turn of millennium (pp. 7–9). Ljubljana: Open Society Institute Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meško, G., & Klemenčič, G. (2007). Rebuilding legitimacy and police professionalism in an emerging democracy: The Slovenian experience. In T. R. Tyler (Ed.), Legitimacy and criminal justice (pp. 84–115). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meško, G., & Lobnikar, B. (2005). The contribution of local safety councils to local responsibility in crime prevention and provision of safety. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 28(2), 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meško, G., Lobnikar, B., Jere, M., & Sotlar, A. (2013). Recent developments of policing in Slovenia. In G. Meško, C. B. Fields, B. Lobnikar, & A. Sotlar (Eds.), Handbook on policing in central and Eastern Europe (pp. 263–286). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation And Work Of The Police Act. (2013) Official Gazette of the RS, No. 15/2013. Ljubljana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagon, M., & Lobnikar, B. (2000). Comparing supervisor and line officer opinions about the code of silence: The case of Slovenia. In M. Pagon (Ed.), Policing in Central and Eastern Europe. Ethics, integrity, and human rights (pp. 197–209). Ljubljana: College of Police and Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagon, M., & Lobnikar, B. (2004). Police integrity in Slovenia. In C. B. Klockars, S. Kutnjak Ivković, & M. R. Haberfeld (Eds.), The contours of police integrity. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagon, M., Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Klockars, C. (1998). The measurement of police integrity in Slovenia. Crime control policies: political rhetoric or empirical reality? Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences Annual Meeting Albuquerque, New Mexico, March 10–14 (p. 221).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagon, M., Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Lobnikar, B. (2000). Police integrity and attitudes toward police corruption: a comparison between the police and the public. In M. Pagon (Ed.), Policing in Central and Eastern Europe. ethics, integrity, and human rights (pp. 383–396). Ljubljana: College of Police and Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagon, M., Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Branko, L. (2003). Policijska integriteta in stališča do policijske korupcije: primerjava med policisti in študenti. In M. V. Pagon, G. Meško, & B. Lobnikar (Eds.), Etika, integriteta in človekove pravice z vidika policijske dejavnosti pp. 149–162. Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve, Visoka policijsko-varnostna šola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Police. (2012). About the police. http://www.policija.si/eng/index.php/aboutthepolice.

  • Police (2013). Policijsko delo v skupnosti. [Community Policing], Doc. no. 2214-41/2012/4 (pp. 207–07). Ljubljana: MNZ, GPU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Police Tasks And Powers Act. (2013). Official Gazette of the RS, No. 15/2013. Ljubljana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Škrbec, J., & Dobovšek, B. (2012). The impact of corruption on the rule of law in the Republic of Slovenia—Facts versus public fiction. In G. Meško, A. Sotlar, & B. Tominc (Eds.), Contemporary criminal justice practice and research: Conference proceedings (pp. 36–37). Ljubljana: Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toš, N. (ur.) (1999). Vrednote v prehodu II: slovenskojavno mnenje 1990–1998 [Values in transition II: Slovene public opinion 1990–1998]. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za druŽbene vede, Inštitut za družbene vede, Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toš, N. (ur.) (2004). Vrednote v prehodu III: slovensko javnomnenje 1999–2004 [Values in transition III: Slovene public opinion 1999–2004]. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za druŽbene vede, Inštitut za družbene vede, Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicchio, S. J. (1997). Ethics and police integrity. Keynote address. National Institute of Justice., National Symposium on Police Integrity. Washington, D.C. (July, 14–16). http://www.fbi.gov/leb/july972.htm. Accessed 1 Sept 1998.

  • Zupančič, B. M., et al. (2000). Ustavno kazensko procesno pravo [Constitutional Criminal Procedure]. Ljubljana: Pasadena.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Branko Lobnikar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lobnikar, B., Meško, G. (2015). Police Integrity in Slovenia. In: Kutnjak Ivković, S., Haberfeld, M. (eds) Measuring Police Integrity Across the World. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2279-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics