Skip to main content

Future Trends in Wildlife Conservation and Management Programs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 999 Accesses

Abstract

Much of what we have to say in this chapter about future trends in wildlife conservation and management will be influenced by whether you are a technological or economic optimist or pessimist. If you are an optimist, we urge you to review thoroughly your entire framework for your optimism, particularly the laws of thermodynamics and our current economic system based upon unlimited growth. Energy is fundamental to human civilization and some forms cannot be easily substituted for others. Our modern industrial civilization is structured around nonrenewable fossil fuels. Being nonrenewable, each fossil fuel, whether coal, oil, or gas, has a certain life span that is dependent on the initial amount and rate of extraction. Extraction and depletion of these resources have certain characteristics. Oil, for instance, is characterized by an increase in rate of extraction, a peaking, and then a decrease, similar in shape to a bell curve. By some accounts, Peak Oil is already upon us. The peaking of world oil means that there will never again be as much oil extracted in subsequent years to meet current and future demands for it. The debate is not if it will happen, but when, and how we will deal with it. We always knew that this event would happen, as oil is a nonrenewable resource along with other fossil hydrocarbons, such as coal and natural gas, each having their own finite limits. We have built an entire global civilization on these nonrenewable resources at great cost to the environment and the biota inhabiting it. How will our fossil fuel dependency be dealt with as these fuels become scarce and more costly, both from a monetary and environmental aspect? Will we make a technological transition and substitute alternative energy sources at the requisite scale? Will we come up with a new source of cheap liquid fuel that is environmentally benign and that will allow us to continue this global civilization, or will we have to “powerdown” in ways presently unanticipated by most people? What will these events mean to contemporary wildlife conservation and management?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aber JD, Martin ME (1995) High spectral resolution remote sensing of canopy chemistry. Pages 1–4 in Summaries of the Fifth JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop, JPL Publication 95–1, vol 1

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Dor E, Levin N (2000) Determination of surface reflectance from raw hyperspectral data without simultaneous ground data measurements: a case study of the GER 63-channel sensor data acquired over Naan, Israel. Int J Remote Sens 21:2053–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burns CE, Johnston KM, Schmitz OJ (2003) Global climate change and mammalian species diversity in U.S. national parks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:11474–11477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Catton WR Jr (1980) Overshoot: the ecological basis of revolutionary change. University of Illinois, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clark RN, King TVV, Ager C, Swayze GA (1995) Initial vegetation species and senescence/stress indicator mapping in the San Luis Valley, Colorado using imaging spectrometer data. In: Posey HH, Pendelton JA, Van Zyl D (eds) Proceedings of Summitville Forum ’95, Colorado Geological Survey Special Publication 38, p 64–69

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cox JD (2005) Climate crash: abrupt climate change and what it means for our future. Joseph Henry, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Czech B (2000a) Economic growth as the limiting factor for wildlife conservation. Wildl Soc Bull 28:4–15

    Google Scholar 

  8. Czech B (2000b) Shoveling fuel for a runaway train: errant economists, shameful spenders, and a plan to stop them all. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  9. Czech B, Krausman PR. 2001. The Endangered Species Act: history, conservation biology, and public policy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deffeyes KS (2005) Beyond oil: the view from Hubbert’s peak. Hill and Wang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duncan RC (2005) The Olduvai Theory: energy, population, and industrial civilization. Soc Contract 16:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  12. Freese CH, Trauger DL (2000) Wildlife markets and biodiversity conservation in North America. Wildl Soc Bull 28:42–51

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gleick PH (1996) Basic water requirements for human activities: meeting basic needs. Water Int 21:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansen J (2007) Climate catastrophe. New Sci 195(July 28):30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heinberg R (2003). The Party’s over: oil, war and the fate of industrial societies. New Society, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heinberg R (2004) Powerdown: options and actions for a post-carbon world. New Society, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heinberg R (2009) Blackout: coal, climate and the last energy crisis. New Society, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ikerd J (2005) Sustainable capitalism: a matter of common sense. Kumarian, Bloomfield

    Google Scholar 

  19. Inkley DB, Anderson MG, Blaustein AR, Burkett VR, Felzer B, Griffith B, Price J, Root TL (2004) Global climate change and wildlife in North America. Wildlife Society Technical Review 04-2. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kunstler JH (2005) The long emergency: surviving the end of oil, climate change, and other converging catastrophes of the twenty-first century. Atlantic Monthly, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lancia RA, Braun CE, Collopy MW, Dueser RD, Kie JG, Martinka CJ, Nichols JD, Nudds TD, Porath WR, Tilghman NG (1996) ARM! For the future: adaptive resource management in the wildlife profession. Wildl Soc Bull 24:436–442

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee K (2004) Development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for wildlife surveillance. M.S. thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marris E (2013) Fly, and bring me data: unmanned aerial vehicles are poised to take off as popular tools for scientific research. Nature 498:156–158

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meadows D, Randers J, Meadows D (2004) Limits to growth: the 30-year global update. Chelsea Green, White River Junction

    Google Scholar 

  25. Merton RN (1999) Multi-temporal analysis of community scale vegetation stress with imaging spectroscopy. Dissertation, Geography Department, University of Auckland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nelson MP, Vucetich JA, Paquet PC, Bump JK (2011) An inadequate construct? North American Model: what’s flawed, what’s missing, what’s needed. Wildl Prof 5:58–60

    Google Scholar 

  27. Odum HT, Odum EC (2001) A prosperous way down: principles and policies. University Press of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pergams ORW, Zaradic PA (2006) Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices. J Environ Manag 80:387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pergams ORW, Zaradic PA (2008a) Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:2295–2300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pergams ORW, Zaradic PA (2008b) Reply to Jacobs and Manfredo: more support for a pervasive decline in nature-based recreation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:E41–E42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, Siqueira MF de, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley B, Jaarsveld AS van, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Townsend Peterson A, Phillips OL, Williams SE (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. U.S. Government Accountability Office [GAO] (2007) Crude oil: uncertainty about future oil supply makes it important to develop a strategy for addressing a peak and decline in oil production. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Report 07-283, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zaradic PA, Pergams ORW, Kareiva P (2009) The impact of nature experience on willingness to support conservation. PLoS ONE 4:e7367

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Edward Gates .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gates, J., Trauger, D. (2014). Future Trends in Wildlife Conservation and Management Programs. In: Gates, J., Trauger, D., Czech, B. (eds) Peak Oil, Economic Growth, and Wildlife Conservation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1954-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1954-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1953-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1954-3

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics