Abstract
The estimation–production paradigm is a set of exercise test procedures designed to assess the validity of using RPE to prescribe and self-regulate exercise intensity. The paradigm is intended to evaluate an individual’s ability to accurately self-regulate exercise intensity according to a specified target RPE or target RPE range. The target RPE is produced and maintained by self-regulating exercise intensity. The target RPE is prescribed using the data derived from a pre-participation GXT also referred to as the estimation trial. In a subsequent exercise training bout called the production trial, the individual is instructed to produce the target RPE by self-adjusting exercise intensity in order to attain the target level of exertion. In an assessment of prescription congruence, physiological responses such as VO2 and HR corresponding to the target RPE are compared between estimation and production trials. This cross-trial comparison is used to determine the validity of exercise intensity self-regulation using a target RPE. Evidence for prescription congruence has been shown for adults and children performing various exercise modalities using both the Borg and OMNI Scales. The primary purpose of this laboratory experiment is to use an estimation–production paradigm to determine an individual’s ability to self-regulate exercise intensity using a target RPE range.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dunbar CC, Robertson RJ, Baun R, Blandin MF, Metz K, Burdett R, Goss FL. The validity of regulating exercise intensity by ratings of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24:94–9.
Dunbar CC, Goris C, Michielli DW, Kalinski MI. Accuracy and reproducibility of an exercise prescription based on ratings of perceived exertion for treadmill and cycle ergometer exercise. Percept Mot Skills. 1994;78:1335–44.
Dunbar CC, Kalinski MI. Using RPE to regulate exercise intensity during a 20-week training program for postmenopausal women: a pilot study. Percept Mot Skills. 2004;99:688–90.
Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee I, Nieman DC, Swain DP. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1334–59.
Higgins LW, Robertson RJ, Kelsey SF, Olson MB, Hoffman LA, Rebovich PJ, Haile L, Orenstein DM. Exercise intensity self-regulation using the OMNI scale in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2013;48:497–505.
Kang J, Chaloupka EC, Mastrangelo MA, Donnelly MS, Martz WP, Robertson RJ. Regulating exercise intensity using ratings of perceived exertion during arm and leg ergometry. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1998;78:241–6.
Kang J, Hoffman JR, Walker H, Chaloupka EC, Utter AC. Regulating intensity using perceived exertion during extended exercise periods. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;89:475–82.
Kang J, Chaloupka EC, Biren GB, Mastrangelo MA, Hoffman JR. Regulating intensity using perceived exertion: effect of exercise duration. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009;105:445–51.
Midgley AW, McNaughton LR, Wilkinson M. Is there an optimal training intensity for enhancing the maximal oxygen uptake of distance runners?: empirical research findings, current opinions, physiological rationale and practical recommendations. Sports Med. 2006;36:117–32.
Parfitt G, Shepherd P, Eston RG. Reliability of effort perception using the children’s CALER and BABE perceived exertion scales. J Exerc Sci Fitness. 2007;5:49–55.
Parfitt G, Evans H, Eston R. Perceptually-regulated training at RPE13 is pleasant and improves physical health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:1613–8.
Robertson RJ. Perceived exertion for practitioners: rating effort with the OMNI picture system. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004.
Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Auble TE, Cassinelli DA, Spina RJ, Glickman EL, Galbreath RW, Silberman RM, Metz KF. Cross-modal exercise prescription at absolute and relative oxygen uptake using perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990;22:653–9.
Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Bell JA, Dixon CB, Gallagher KI, Lagally KM, Timmer JM, Abt KL, Gallagher JD, Thompkins T. Self-regulated cycling using the children’s OMNI scale of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1168–75.
Swain DP, Franklin BA. VO2 reserve and the minimal intensity for improving cardiorespiratory fitness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:152–7.
Ulmer HV. Concept of an extracellular regulation of muscular metabolic rate during heavy exercise in humans by psychophysiological feedback. Experientia. 1996;52:416–20.
Ward DS, Bar-Or O. Use of the Borg scale in exercise prescription for overweight youth. Can J Sport Sci. 1990;15:120–5.
Weiser PC, Wojciechowicz V, Funck A, Robertson RJ. Perceived effort step-up procedures for self-regulating stationary cycle exercise intensity by patients with cardiovascular disease. Percept Mot Skills. 2007;104:236–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haile, L., Gallagher, M., J. Robertson, R. (2015). The Estimation–Production Paradigm for Exercise Intensity Self-Regulation. In: Perceived Exertion Laboratory Manual. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1917-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1917-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1916-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1917-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)