Abstract
Direct observation of a student in the naturalistic environment is used to screen for problems, assess emotional and behavioral functioning, evaluate the classroom environment in the design of interventions, and monitor student performance and progress. Observation, which is required for a child who has been referred for a special education evaluation, takes two primary forms—naturalistic and systematic. Naturalistic observation involves the anecdotal recording of all behaviors occurring, whereas systematic direct observation is conducted under standardized procedures and entails the recording and measurement of specific, operationally defined behaviors. These two approaches are described in greater detail within this chapter, which also includes recommendations for reporting and sample narratives and tables.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abikoff, H., Courtney, M., Pelham, W. E., Jr., & Koplewicz, H. S. (1993). Teachers’ ratings of disruptive behaviors: The influence of halo effects. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 21, 519–533.
Adair, J. G. (1984). The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 334–345.
Eckert, T. L., Martens, B. K., & Di Gennaro, F. D. (2005). Describing antecedent-behavior-consequence relations using conditional probabilities and the general operant contingency space: A preliminary investigation. School Psychology Review, 34, 520–528.
Flanagan, D. P., & Kaufman, A. S. (2009). Essentials of WISC-IV assessment (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Frick, P. J., Barry, C. T., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2005). Clinical assessment of child and adolescent personality and behavior (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Gresham, F. M., MacMillan, D. L., Beebe-Frankenberger, M. E., & Bocian, K. M. (2000). Treatment integrity in learning disabilities intervention research: Do we really know how treatments are implemented? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 198–205.
Gresham, F. M., Watson, T. S., & Skinner, C. H. (2001). Functional behavioral assessment: Principles, procedures, and future directions. School Psychology Review, 30, 156–172.
Hintze, J. M. (2005). Psychometrics of direct observation. School Psychology Review, 34, 507.
Hintze, J. M., Stoner, G., & Bull, M. H. (2000). Analogue assessment: Emotional/behavioral problems. In E. S. Shapiro & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Conducting school-based assessments of child and adolescent behavior (p. 519). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Hintze, J. M., Volpe, R. J., & Shapiro, E. S. (2008). Best practices in the systematic direct observation of student behavior. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 319–335). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
Knoff, H. M. (2002). Best practices in personality assessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, vol. 2 (4th ed., pp. 1303–1320). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Leedy, L. (2003). Mapping Penny’s world. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Co.
McConaughy, S. H., & Ritter, D. R. (2002). Best practices in multidimensional assessment of emotional or behavioral disorders. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, vol. 2 (4th ed., pp. 1303–1320). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Mercatoris, M., & Craighead, W. E. (1974). Effects of nonparticipant observation teacher and pupil classroom behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 512–519.
Mori, L. T., & Armendariz, G. M. (2001). Analogue assessment of child behavior problems. Psychological Assessment, 13, 36–45.
Murphy, K. R., Jako, R. A., & Anhalt, R. L. (1993). Nature and consequences of halo error: A critical analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 218–225.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2011). Comprehensive assessment and evaluation of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 3–16.
Pearson, Inc. (2013). BOSS user’s guide. Bloomington, MN: Author. Retrieved on February 7, 2014 from http://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/Assets/BOSS/BOSS_UsersGuide.pdf
Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). The behavior assessment system for children manual (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
Shapiro, E. S. (2011a). Academic skills problems (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Shapiro, E. S. (2011b). Academic skills problems workbook (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Shapiro, E. S., Benson, J. L., Clemens, N. H., & Gischlar, K. L. (2011). Academic assessment. In M. Bray & T. Kehle (Eds.), Oxford handbook of school psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, E. S., & Clemens, N. H. (2005). Conducting systematic direct classroom observations to define school-related problems. In R. Brown-Chidsey (Ed.), Assessment for intervention: A problem-solving approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Skinner, C. H., Rhymer, K. N., & McDaniel, E. C. (2000). Naturalistic direct observation in educational settings. In E. S. Shapiro & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Conducting school-based assessments of child and adolescent behavior. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Steege, M. W., & Watson, T. S. (2009). Conducting school-based functional behavioral assessments: A practitioner’s guide (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Stichter, J. P. (2001). Functional analysis: The use of analogues in applied settings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 232–239.
Tiger, J. H., Miller, S. J., Mevers, J. L., Mintz, J. C., Scheithauer, M. C., & Alvarez, J. (2013). On the representativeness of behavior observation samples in classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 424–435.
Volpe, R. J., DiPerna, J. C., Hintze, J. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (2005). Observing students in classroom settings: A review of seven coding schemes. School Psychology Review, 34, 454–474.
Whitcomb, S., & Merrell, K. W. (2013). Behavioral, social, and emotional assessment of children and adolescents (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Wilson, M. S., & Reschly, D. J. (1996). Assessment in school psychology training and practice. School Psychology Review, 25, 9–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dombrowski, S.C., Gischlar, K.L. (2015). Observing the Child. In: Psychoeducational Assessment and Report Writing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1911-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1911-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1910-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1911-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)