Abstract
This chapter offers guidance on important topics in assessment and report writing and comprises two sections. The first section discusses professional and ethical issues in psychoeducational assessment and report writing. The second section covers general assessment and report writing issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Brueggeman, A. E. (2014). Diagnostic assessment of learning disabilities in childhood. New York: Springer.
Canivez, G. L. (2013). Psychometric versus actuarial interpretation of intelligence and related aptitude batteries. In D. H. Saklofske, C. R. Reynolds, & V. L. Schwean (Eds.), The oxford handbook of child psychological assessments (pp. 84–112). New York: Oxford University Press.
Canter, A. (2001). Test protocols part II: Storage and disposal. Communiqué, 30. Retrieved on June 3, 2014 from http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq/cq301protocolsII.aspx.
Canter, A. (2005). Test protocols and parent’s rights—to copies?. Communiqué, 34. Retrieved on June 3, 2014 from http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq/cq341protocols.aspx.
Carlson, J. C. Hansen, N. R. Kuncel, S. P. Reise, & M. C. Rodriguez (Eds.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 2: Testing and assessment in clinical and counseling psychology (pp. 35–50). Washington, DC. American Psychological Association.
Clinton, A. (2014). Assessing bilingual children in context: An integrated approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Dombrowski, S. C. (2003). Ethical standards and best practices in using newly revised intelligence tests. Communiqué, 32(1), 12.
Dombrowski, S. (2004). To WISC-III or not to WISC-III, that is the question: A rejoinder to Thomas Oakland. Communiqué, 32(3), 15–16.
Dombrowski, S. C. (2013). Investigating the structure of the WJ-III at school age. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 154–169.
Dombrowski, S. C. (2014). Exploratory bifactor analysis of the WJ-III cognitive in adulthood via the Schmid–Leiman procedure. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 330–341. doi:10.1177/0734282913508243.
Dombrowski, S. C., Ahia, C. E., & McQuillan, K. (2003). Protecting children through mandated child abuse reporting. The Educational Forum, 67(2), 76–85.
Dombrowski, S. C., & Gischlar, K. L. (2014). Ethical and empirical considerations in the identification of learning disabilities. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 30, 68–82.
Dombrowski, S. C., Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2004). After the demise of the discrepancy: Proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 364–372.
Dombrowski, S. C., & Watkins, M. W. (2013). Exploratory and higher order factor analysis of the WJ-III full test battery: A school-aged analysis. Psychological Assessment, 25, 442–455.
Floyd, R. B., & Bose, J. B. (2003). Behavior rating scales for the assessment of emotional disturbance: A critical review of measurement characteristics. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 21, 43–78.
Frick, P. J., Barry, C. T., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2010). Clinical assessment of children’s personality and behavior (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
Kamphaus, R. W. (in press). Clinical assessment of child and adolescent intelligence (3rd ed.). Springer: New York.
Kranzler, J. A., & Floyd, R. G. (2013). Assessing intelligence in children and adolescents: A practical guide. New York: Guilford Press.
Lichtenstein, R. (2010). How soon must you switch to a new test? Communiqué, 38. Retrieved on April 23, 2014 from http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq/index.aspx?vol=38&issue=8.
McDermott, P. A., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Glutting, J. J. (1990). Just say no to subtest analysis: A critique on Wechsler theory and practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 290–302.
Oakland, T. (2003). Standards for using revised tests: A different opinion. Communiqué, 32(3), 10–11.
Reynolds, C. R. (1981). The fallacy of “two years below grade level for age” as a diagnostic criterion for reading disorders. Journal of School Psychology, 19, 350–358.
Rhodes, R., Ochoa, S. H., & Ortiz, S. O. (2005). Assessment of culturally and linguistically diverse students: A practical guide. New York: The Guilford Press.
Watkins, M. W., Glutting, J. J., & Youngstrom, E. A. (2005). Issues in subtest profile analysis. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 251–268). NY: Guilford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dombrowski, S.C. (2015). Special Issues in Psychoeducational Assessment and Report Writing. In: Psychoeducational Assessment and Report Writing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1911-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1911-6_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1910-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1911-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)