Abstract
Community sentiment is often measured by asking community members their opinions; however, individuals who enforce laws provide unique perspectives. This is especially true when laws are on the books but are not actively enforced. The current chapter details a mail survey study that examined the perspectives of prosecuting attorneys and police chiefs concerning parental involvement laws. Parental involvement laws hold parents legally accountable for the illegal behavior and status offenses of their children. Overall, prosecuting attorneys and police chiefs did not view these laws as effective yet tended to blame parents for juvenile delinquency and for difficulties in implementing parental involvement laws. Therefore, this legal professional sample did not have strong support for these laws, which may provide an explanation for why these laws are very common yet infrequently enforced. The chapter also addresses benefits and difficulties in assessing community sentiment with a limited mail survey to legal professionals.
The authors wish to thank Teresa Kulig for her work on this research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, R., & Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: The moderating influence of socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 288–297. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.83.2.288.
Brank, E. M., Greene, E., & Hochevar, K. (2011). Holding parents responsible: Is vicarious responsibility the public’s answer to juvenile crime? Psychology, Public Policy and the Law, 17, 507–529. doi:10.1037/a0024566.
Brank, E. M., Hays, S. A., & Weisz, V. (2006). Global and specific attitudes toward parental responsibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2670–2684. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00122.x.
Brank, E. M., Kucera, S. C., & Hays, S. A. (2005). Parental responsibility statutes: An organization and policy implications. Journal of Law and Family Studies, 7, 1–55.
Brank, E. M., & Lane, J. (2008). Punishing my parents: Juveniles’ perspectives on parental responsibility. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 333–348. doi:10.1177/0887403407311956.
Brank, E. M., & Scott, L. B. (2012). The historical, jurisprudential, and empirical wisdom of parental responsibility laws. Social Issues and Policy Review, 6, 26–53.
Brank, E. M., & Weisz, V. (2004). Paying for the crimes of their youth: Public support of parental responsibility laws. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 465–475. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.06.010.
Buchanan, N. (1998). The effects of parental involvement on 12th grade achievement. Georgetown Public Policy Review, 4, 75–95.
Burke, A. (2010). When family matters. The Yale Law Journal Online, 119, 1210–1234.
de Keijser, J. W., van Koppen, P. J., & Elffers, H. (2007). Bridging the gap between judges and the public? A multi-method study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 131–161. doi:10.1007/s11292-007-9031-2.
Dula, C. S., Dwyer, W. O., & LeVerne, G. (2007). Policing the drunk driver: Measuring law enforcement involvement in reducing alcohol-impaired driving. Journal of Safety Research, 38, 267–272. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2006.10.007.
Fetherston, J., & Lenton, S. (2005). Community attitudes towards cannabis law and the proposed Cannabis Infringement Notice scheme in Western Australia. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24, 301–309. doi:10.1080/09595230500263897.
Finn, M. A., & Stalans, L. J. (1997). The influence of gender and mental state on police decisions in domestic assault cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 157–176.
Harris, L. J. (2006). An empirical study of parental responsibility laws: Sending messages, but what kind and to whom? Utah Law Review, 5–34.
Kittel, N. G. (1986). Criminal defense attorneys: A study of pluralism in practice styles and conditions. The Journal of the Legal Profession, 44, 85–102.
Laskin, E. R. (2000). How parental liability statutes criminalize and stigmatize minority mothers. American Criminal Law Review, 37, 1195–1217.
Luchins, D. J., Cooper, A. E., Hanrahan, P., & Heyrman, M. J. (2006). Lawyers’ attitudes toward involuntary treatment. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 34, 492–500.
MacLennan, B., Kypri, K., Langley, J., & Room, R. (2011). Public opinion and local governmental alcohol policy: A study of seven New Zealand communities. Contemporary Drug Problems: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 38, 367–386.
Moak, S. C., & Wallace, L. H. (2000). Attitudes of Louisiana practitioners toward rehabilitation of juvenile offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 271–285.
Pritchard, D. (1986). Homicide and bargained justice: The agenda-setting effect of crime news on prosecutors. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 143–159.
Rebouche, R. (2011). Parental involvement laws and new governance. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, 34, 175–223.
Rookey, B. D., Le, L., Littlejohn, M., & Dillman, D. A. (2012). Understanding the resilience of mail-back survey methods: An analysis of 20 years of change in response rates to national park surveys. Social Science Research, 41, 1404–1414.
Roper v. Simmons. (2005). 543 U.S. 551.
Saunders, D. G. (1995). The tendency to arrest victims of domestic violence: A preliminary analysis of officer characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 147–150. doi:10.1177/0886260595010002001.
Tyler, T. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Varela, J. G., Boccaccini, M. T., Gonzalez, E., Gharagozloo, L., & Johnson, S. M. (2011). Do defense attorney referrals for competence to stand trial evaluations depend on whether the client speaks English or Spanish? Law and Human Behavior, 35, 501–511. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9253-1.
Acknowledgement
This research was supported in part by a University of Nebraska Faculty Seed Grant and portions of it were presented at the 2011 American Psychology-Law conference in Miami, Florida.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brank, E.M., Hoetger, L.A., Wylie, L.E., Scott, L.B. (2015). Using Mail Surveys to Assess Perceptions of Law Enforcement Officers and Prosecuting Attorneys Regarding Parental Involvement Laws. In: Miller, M., Blumenthal, J., Chamberlain, J. (eds) Handbook of Community Sentiment. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1899-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1899-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1898-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1899-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)